MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #21 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #821
I can't understand why anyone still took it seriously after T1 but this makes it official IMO.
I can't understand why others don't take discrepancies seriously. Up to 20 meters (60ft) accuracy for anything he's talking about does not prove it's official IMO.
Edited footage
 
Last edited:
  • #822
He believes the car stopped near the flag pole. Key words, “he believes”.
The car was still moving at 15 miles an hour could NOT turn in the driveway
 
  • #823
  • #824
  • #825
Why would your phone need to? That's really what Google is doing on your account and especially in Chrome IMO

ETA - in any event hopefully this entire theory tentpoled around Green's faulty analysis can now be put to bed.
I think in the vein of being an accurate representation of the digital forensic examination. Cellibrite has limitations.

I use duck duck go in safari so as long as I stick to one tab and never close it, my phone would never show any searches. I’m not a criminal, but I guess that’s useful info for someone out there 😆
 
  • #826
Cell phone never went into the house. Pinged by the flag pole the whole time.
 
  • #827
Cell phone data shows John O’Keefe never entered the house at 34 Fairview

Putting to bed the whole climbing 3 flights of stairs, being attacked by Chloe, being attacked and killed inside the house.
 
  • #828
  • #829
SCOTUS - denied Karen Read’s petition for consideration
 
  • #830
He hasn't even got to the phone battery temperatures yet...
 
  • #831
Yeh the cell phone data really has me questioning everything.

Wait until we get to the " Butt dial" claims ! Made by not one, but three different witnesses who were present at 34 Fairview in the early morning hours of 1/29/22. What are the odds of that? One wonders....
 
  • #832
I can't understand why others don't take discrepancies seriously. Up to 20 meters (100 ft) accuracy for anything he's talking about does not prove it's official IMO.
20 metres is approx 65 feet.
 
  • #833
SCOTUS - denied Karen Read’s petition for consideration
Funny how she looks like she is enjoying at attention at the trial.
 
  • #834
I can't understand why others don't take discrepancies seriously. Up to 20 meters (100 ft) accuracy for anything he's talking about does not prove it's official IMO.
The dots he showed around the flagpole at the end were all within </=10 meter accuracy he said. So around 30 ft or less from the flagpole.
 
  • #835
20 metres is approx 65 feet.
Yes I’m sorry. I was so astounded by the levels of inaccuracy that I multiplied 5m x 20m by mistake. 1m is approximately 3ft for quick math.
65 feet for anyone wanting an approximate visual is the length of one of those long articulated buses you see in most cities.
 
  • #836
12:32 am John O’Keefe never moved after 12:32
 
  • #837
OHH, he's still yapping
 
  • #838
So the data updates around 15 to 20 seconds after the event (flight climb, steps etc).
 
  • #839
  • #840
He's compared actual gradients/altitude changes (topography) with the flight climb health data.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
1,465
Total visitors
1,578

Forum statistics

Threads
632,486
Messages
18,627,487
Members
243,167
Latest member
s.a
Back
Top