You’re certainly entitled to your opinion. But opinions alone don’t meet the legal standard for guilt. Saying “Karen’s own words will convict her” doesn’t hold if those words were panicked speculations, taken out of context, or contradicted by physical evidence (which they are).
I feel that I addressed your earlier claims about the taillight, the medical examiner’s findings, Proctor’s documented behavior, or the inconsistencies in witness statements. If those details are truly “irrelevant,” it should be easy to explain why. But just dismissing them without engaging doesn’t strengthen your argument. It actually makes it look like the defense might be right, precisely because no one wants to touch the uncomfortable facts that don’t line up with preconceived opinions. Let’s not forget: in a court of law, it’s not enough to say “I believe.” You need proof. And if the state had slam-dunk evidence, it wouldn’t need to rely on inconsistent stories, shady police work, or vibes. MOO.