The OP recommended others to watch that particular documentary. My question to the OP asked why they don't recommend to others to simply watch the entire trial, where all information can be gathered as a whole, not cherry-picking individual statements to come to a lopsided conclusion. I think watching the entire trial is the most helpful for others to understand all of the facts. I hope that helps you to understand.
Watching and using docu as a whole is the WRONG approach and misleading as to where thus trial will go.
More importantlly to note, the docu is simply not trial evidence. Each side may bring bits and pieces that they like -- and may ignore ones they don't like -- to the jury. But ONLY what is presented at trial will have any bearing on the verdict.
In addition, both sides have to be careful what they pull from the docu, as there can be a danger that they end up contradicting their own claims as to what happened and when. You can't have it both ways, in the testimony you present as factual, which is of extra concern to the cw as their story has to hold up to being true BARD.