I see it as helping the defense with more evidence showing the incompetence by Canon LE.And in other cases where protocol is not followed and chain of custody is not documented and evidence is mishandled and/or unlawfully obtained, isn't that evidence considered invalid, unusable, corrupted, ie useless in court and is thus thrown out and ordered not to be considered valid evidence at trial?
Why this compromised and invalid data is still being considered legal evidence in this case, I can't understand. Seems against all legal conventions and judicial policies and standards and I believe unconstitutional.
Since it's totally compromised can it even be used as actual evidence?
Then again it's Cannone who called the shots.
I don't know what the outcome with Gallagher's evidence collecting during the 1st. trial was.
imo