MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #24 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #141
It is frankly just shocking that a dead body on the lawn was not considered enough evidence to get a search warrant to search the house. It would have been for any other individual except when it's a cop's house, apparently.
 
  • #142
It is frankly just shocking that a dead body on the lawn was not considered enough evidence to get a search warrant to search the house. It would have been for any other individual except when it's a cop's house, apparently.
Some might even call it unbelievable… MOO
 
  • #143
Where was JOK's duty-issued firearm?
 
  • #144
Sarah Levinson testified yesterday that Matt McCabe suddenly remembered he left his coat in the Albert’s house and went back inside to retrieve it around 1:45 am as JmC and he were preparing to drive Ms Levinson home. It was now snowing more steadily and SL testified she was watching her step as she left the Albert residence because it was slippery. Wouldn’t MmC have realized he didn’t have his coat as soon as he stepped outside? Or did he need discuss something with the Alberts out of earshot of the younger girls?
 
  • #145
Robert Gilman is on the stand to discuss the weather conditions on the 28th/29th.
 
  • #146
Oh geez.

" The ground was frozen " Meteorologist expert.

Karen Read must have done it....
 
  • #147
  • #148
There is no way I am ever going to believe JOK's head injury was a result of hitting his head on the ground. NO WAY.
 
  • #149
Robert Gilman is on the stand to discuss the weather conditions on the 28th/29th.
I thought his role was to explain snow to the entire Canton PD.
 
  • #150
HAHAHA
This witness might be my new all time fav.
Trumping Dr. Voss
 
  • #151
Poor sad ,did not know they was in for bad weather -New Englanders.
Old-fashion New Englander weather has not been just that in more than a decade. People are humans not robots. They can make mistakes, make some poor judgements. That does not mean they're corrupt, being dishonest. You can even have some unlikable personalities within LE, doesn't mean their bad actors planting evidence to frame someone. This case is tragic but simple hit and run, not a complicated wide-spread conspiracy involving, what's the body count now, twenty or so people. AJMO
 
  • #152
Old-fashion New Englander weather has not been just that in more than a decade. People are humans not robots. They can make mistakes, make some poor judgements. That does not mean they're corrupt, being dishonest. You can even have some unlikable personalities within LE, doesn't mean their bad actors planting evidence to frame someone. This case is tragic but simple hit and run, not a complicated wide-spread conspiracy involving, what's the body count now, twenty or so people. AJMO
This was not a simple hit and run. See ARCCA testimony. JMOO
 
  • #153
Poor jury.
Waiting for the questions:

"Were there high top tables?"
'Was the band playing?"

"What if any......?"

Oh Lally
 
  • #154
Poor jury.
Waiting for the questions:

"Were there high top tables?"
'Was the band playing?"

"What if any......?"

Oh Lally
Fitting that lally is in charge of yet another weather report.
 
  • #155
Old-fashion New Englander weather has not been just that in more than a decade. People are humans not robots. They can make mistakes, make some poor judgements. That does not mean they're corrupt, being dishonest. You can even have some unlikable personalities within LE, doesn't mean their bad actors planting evidence to frame someone. This case is tragic but simple hit and run, not a complicated wide-spread conspiracy involving, what's the body count now, twenty or so people. AJMO
The problem with your take is that it treats this case like it’s already been cleanly decided, when it hasn’t. There was a mistrial. The state couldn’t convince twelve jurors beyond a reasonable doubt with all their evidence laid out. That alone should tell you this is not an open-and-shut case.

No one is saying every person involved is a cartoon villain part of a Scooby-Doo gang conspiracy - in fact, that’s a straw man fallacy. What I and many others are saying is that the investigation was botched at best, and at worst, manipulated. When you have deleted texts, late-entered evidence, contradictory statements, and officers admitting under oath they don’t know if their department keeps evidence logs, the issue isn’t just “poor judgment.” It’s incompetence and possible misconduct and deserves to be thoroughly looked into.
 
  • #156
This guy is such a geek, I love it!!!

ETA: Loved the history lesson he gave :)
 
  • #157
Old-fashion New Englander weather has not been just that in more than a decade. People are humans not robots. They can make mistakes, make some poor judgements. That does not mean they're corrupt, being dishonest. You can even have some unlikable personalities within LE, doesn't mean their bad actors planting evidence to frame someone. This case is tragic but simple hit and run, not a complicated wide-spread conspiracy involving, what's the body count now, twenty or so people. AJMO
Right people make mistakes.
Or they get mad and plow over their most current bf at 25 miles an hour in reverse while leaving zero evidence on his person that it ever happened.
The planting of the evidence was bought about by the action of the planting. I.E the tail light.
I am open to other debates,not the tail light one. It has been shown in the most of current of trials that the tail light was on her truck after jok WAS on the lawn .
Their timeline. Not mine.
 
  • #158
  • #159
  • #160
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
61
Guests online
3,397
Total visitors
3,458

Forum statistics

Threads
633,427
Messages
18,641,812
Members
243,530
Latest member
tinfi87
Back
Top