- Joined
- Nov 4, 2017
- Messages
- 2,760
- Reaction score
- 22,951
What does it even mean!I wanted to see the lyrics to the song Jen looked up on her phone.
I though it an interesting song to choose.It's Raining Men Lyrics by The Weather Girls
What does it even mean!I wanted to see the lyrics to the song Jen looked up on her phone.
I though it an interesting song to choose.It's Raining Men Lyrics by The Weather Girls
Facepalm.. exactly what does Brennan think these three second clips of Karen will achieve? If I were the jurors, I’d be thinking ‘Gee, I wish they’d show that whole clip!’
These clips without context are designed to affect the jury psychologically. He wants the members of the jury to be affected mentally in their thinking, emotionally in their feelings and behaviorally in their verdict. A form of manipulation.
What does it even mean!
Supposedly Chloe had a fight with another dog - in May IIRCAnyone know what NA's or BA's excuse was for shipping Chloe to a farm in Vermont?
![]()
The dog did it? What to know about the German Shepherd tied to the Karen Read trial
Among key arguments in Karen Read’s defense is that the injuries on John O’Keefe’s arm were marks from an apparent animal attack.www.patriotledger.com
Lets swab a few males from Fairview!They found it in the snow. I believe AJ said it was tested and there was dna of 5 males in that shoe.
German Shepherds and Red Solo Cups will never be the same again. I can't even listen to Toby Keith's song without seeing dang Gallagher. GEEZ.I didn't watch the first trial so I've been doing a bit of catch-up watching the testimonies on YT.
Nicole Albert testified that she didn't get rid of her dog, she "re-homed her" to Vermont.
That is where I reside so now whenever I see a German Shepherd I'm going to say "Hi Chloe.
I'll update if need be, chuckle.
Just got there Luna. I retract my statement! Oh my!You haven’t gotten to the part where she makes expressions with her eyes in a condescending manner.
Lets swab a few males from Fairview!They found it in the snow. I believe AJ said it was tested and there was dna of 5 males in that shoe.
And if I understood that drawn out examination of her smugness, is it correct that she was confirming there was indeed a search at 02:27 (or whichever time it was) where she searched hos long to die in the snow?
It confirms that she's not satisfied with her hubby!What does it even mean!
And May the 4th be with you! LOLOLSeveral responses were "Roger" just brilliant
Didn’t JM call sister NA BEFORE she was contacted by KR?I have been wondering exactly this since Day 1!
As to the other part of your post, KerryR did call LE before she got together w/KR and JM.
Thank you for your service!Totally agree with you - Even myself I am so good at maintaining my calm demeanor until it is a child or someone I know and then you will hear the quiver in my voice on a call - I cant say where I work but I can say that I have had every type of call other than a plane crash (thank God) and I don't work in a small department that only gets the silly (IMO) parking complaints or loud music calls - We get it all from homicide straight to the bottom of loose dogs so I do have an extensive range of callers and how they react - IMO
When did she look it up?I wanted to see the lyrics to the song Jen looked up on her phone.
I though it an interesting song to choose.It's Raining Men Lyrics by The Weather Girls
A very weird song that she thought was soooooo funny that the women/girls were all singing. Goofy. If that is her mindset for fun, it makes me wonder further if JMc had a real thing for John and she believes Karen took him away from her personally. Her intense cattiness and evil looks toward Karen have been over the top, especially after 3 years. MOOIt confirms that she's not satisfied with her hubby!
It gets better....haha. And someone PAID for this....twice....Just got there Luna. I retract my statement! Oh my!
My jaw hit the floor when she said that, then she was laughing at her own joke. LolAnd May the 4th be with you! LOLOL
Thank you @chckmate22Hi all. It's been a long while since I have posted here, but do still read the forums. It is nice to see a lot of familiar names and read most of the comments. My point is that this case brings me back to Caylee Anthony and the trial of her "mom". It seems to be kinda the same as it was back then, where certain posters are only on here to start an argument or initiate a debate into things that are almost to keep people from reading what the facts are. Disagreements are fine, but the baiting and antagonizing is not. I am 100% about different perspectives and views but some of these posters are just trying to bait for an argument, not to discuss different view points. I am a verified 911 Dispatcher, which include answering 911 calls, dispatching police and fire. I have 30 years experience, and I still work and dispatch for departments that have 40 officers on duty at a time to as little as 2 officers on at any given time. IMO the initial 911 call says everything - "there is a "man" passed out in the snow". That was not a "man" not only was it supposedly her friend she loved dearly, he was also an off duty police officer. I have in the span of 30 years taken every different type of call you can imagine. That call in my expertise is someone who is out during the day on a walk and finds a random stranger down on the ground in the snow. Everything from that 911 call to where we are today in this trial is deplorable and a disgrace to any Law Enforcement Agecny. IMO
RSBM- for saying it like it is, calling out the baiting and antagonizing which is not helpful, entertaining or fun