Well...Seems like it’s the same shoe as yesterday (found at 34F). Where is the other shoe that was on JO’s foot when found in snow and probably discarded by medical staff at the hospital?
that ...
is ..
odd!
Well...Seems like it’s the same shoe as yesterday (found at 34F). Where is the other shoe that was on JO’s foot when found in snow and probably discarded by medical staff at the hospital?
I wonder if JOK being off-duty, drunk, carrying around open alcohol in a vehicle, insisting someone he knew would be drinking be his designated driver, and being found on another cop's lawn has anything to do with calling him Mister. But when it serves their purpose, these clowns refer to him as a cop.It really does rub me the wrong way with the excuse of ‘He was an officer,’ but they all refer to him as Mr. O’Keefe, not Officer O’Keefe. It reads to me that they’re using their ‘respect’ for him to cover for some gaps in their investigation.
I'm watching Emily Baker's trial coverage and she explained that it was essentially the court's ruling that he be referred to as Mr. O'Keefe and that all of the officers testifying wear civilian clothes and not their uniforms. I'll try to find a better explanation, since I forgot some of what she said. tl:dr The court said to call him Mr. O'Keefe.It really does rub me the wrong way with the excuse of ‘He was an officer,’ but they all refer to him as Mr. O’Keefe, not Officer O’Keefe. It reads to me that they’re using their ‘respect’ for him to cover for some gaps in their investigation.
I'd like to see both shoes side by side to compare/contrast the differences, especially the color. Being out in the snow for one day would never turn a worn shoe into looking like a sparkling white new shoe.Seems like it’s the same shoe as yesterday (found at 34F). Where is the other shoe that was on JO’s foot when found in snow and probably discarded by medical staff at the hospital?
But it looks like it just came out of the box?To me the spotless shoe indicates he was knocked out and stayed down due to injuries.
If you google KR and the results include a discussion as to what happened to JOK by the Canton locals.
Thank you - yes!I'd like to see both shoes side by side to compare/contrast the differences, especially the color. Being out in the snow for one day would never turn a worn shoe into looking like a sparkling white new shoe.
Was JOK carrying his official firearm?I wonder if JOK being off-duty, drunk, carrying around open alcohol in a vehicle, insisting someone he knew would be drinking be his designated driver, and being found on another cop's lawn has anything to do with calling him Mister. But when it serves their purpose, these clowns refer to him as a cop.
MOO
Idk, I doubt the judge would have made him ask that question, but that's just MO.I recall that, and it was after a sidebar, they were foundational questions. I would take a BIG guess that after an objection, the judge made him ask the ridiculous question to set the foundation for the following questions about Johns various wounds.
JMO
I gather that JOL was wearing them throughout the evening leading up to his death?To me the spotless shoe indicates he was knocked out and stayed down due to injuries.
If you google KR and the results include a discussion as to what happened to JOK by the Canton locals.
Going down the local rabbithole today, and it's pretty enlightening.To me the spotless shoe indicates he was knocked out and stayed down due to injuries.
If you google KR and the results include a discussion as to what happened to JOK by the Canton locals.
I don't know how it works in Boston/Canton but, I have a family member who is a Police Officer for St. Louis County, MO and he is required to carry his firearm, badge and identification when off-duty.Was JOK carrying his official firearm?
Since all of these officers come across as laws don't apply to them I've been curious if the off-duty pack of officers were out drinking for hours and all were armed?
imo
imo
Thanks.I don't know how it works in Boston/Canton but, I have a family member who is a Police Officer for St. Louis County, MO and he is required to carry his firearm, badge and identification when off-duty.
Thanks! I hadn’t heard that, but it does make sense.I'm watching Emily Baker's trial coverage and she explained that it was essentially the court's ruling that he be referred to as Mr. O'Keefe and that all of the officers testifying wear civilian clothes and not their uniforms. I'll try to find a better explanation, since I forgot some of what she said. tl:dr The court said to call him Mr. O'Keefe.