I think many of us who think this should end in a not guilty verdict (at this point with what has been presented) can see that it might be possible she hit him. We also see all the things that are very wrong with his case.
What I don't understand is the Karen is guilty no matter what group that can't see how wrong all this other stuff is. Saying this guy on the stand is a good witness? Saying the woman the other day was a good witness? IMO it's absurd to watch a witness lie on the stand and refuse to just answer questions and then admit to something finally and then say those are good witnesses. Good witnesses don't need to lie or avoid questions. They remember what to say because it's the truth and the story doesn't change because it's the truth. Some just plain refuse to say that LE made big mistakes here and that it's possible the mistakes will lead to a not guilty verdict.
I support and back the blue, but I also hold them to a standard that is above what the average person is held to. They should be transparent and forthcoming and admit mistakes. That is what a person with integrity does and I expect LEO to have the highest integrity. Covering for your buddies just because you are LE means you are just as bad as the person doing the wrong. A true good friend will hold you accountable because they want you to be a stand-up person. This trial is filled with people trying to hide behind a badge while not living up to the high standard a LEO should. That is why we are on trial 2 right now. IMO All just my opinion.
VERY well said!!! How anyone can look at this blockhead and think this in any way, shape or form is acceptable behavior in any profession needs to have their head examined IMO. Why are people making excuses for this fraud? Would you want him investigating a death of loved one? I wouldn't want him within 3 states of a loved one living or dead.