MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #26 Retrial

An independent study already proved John was not hit by a car.So you have no explanation about why the LE is telling lies in this case? Okay.
No it didn't prove that, it is one opinion of two, for which there is a trial in progress and no verdict at this time, but it's still besides the point about staging of taillight.

IMO
 
No it didn't prove that, it is one opinion of two, for which there is a trial in progress and no verdict at this time, but it's still besides the point about staging of taillight.

IMO
Sorry but an independent study in which neither side hired will always mean truth to me over any so called expert for EITHER side. They don't care about John or Karen and have zero reason to lie.
 
It's been pointed out that AJ made a large blunder on cross yesterday.

Until now, Brennan still needed to call Proctor for some tail light foundation. Proctor found a number of pieces on his own, and Yuri couldn't bring those pieces in. Brennan probably needs all those pieces so the lab tech can testify about putting the tail light back together as happened in T1.

But AJ inadvertently created the foundation by showing Yuri a picture of all the pieces, so then Brennan admitted all the rest of the pieces on redirect.

So now it appears the CW don't have any need to call Proctor as all his evidence is in.

At 6 hours 29
They weren't going to call him, anyway.
IMO.
 
Sorry but an independent study in which neither side hired will always mean truth to me over any so called expert for EITHER side.
We are each entitled to our opinions, but that's all they are.

The first jury did not unanimously agree that Karen was not guilty of manslaughter, even after hearing ARCCA's testimony.

As yet, it's an undecided matter. But still has nothing to do with my post that you replied to -

And then there's the other aspect, there needs to be a reason for staging, at a time when the defendant did not tell anyone that she saw John going into the house, continued not to make that claim for months, and had not denied hitting him.
 
It's been pointed out that AJ made a large blunder on cross yesterday.

Until now, Brennan still needed to call Proctor for some tail light foundation. Proctor found a number of pieces on his own, and Yuri couldn't bring those pieces in. Brennan probably needs all those pieces so the lab tech can testify about putting the tail light back together as happened in T1.

But AJ inadvertently created the foundation by showing Yuri a picture of all the pieces, so then Brennan admitted all the rest of the pieces on redirect.

So now it appears the CW don't have any need to call Proctor as all his evidence is in.

At 6 hours 29
The CW had no intent to call Proctor
IMO
 
I think this is why Dr Wolfe from ARCCA did his glass cannon experiment.

I personally have not ruled out the possibility that there is some very unusual combination of events here.
Mr Jitty, do you have an opinion of Karen’s guilt or innocence? I haven’t followed the case but a couple of days ago i read here that some police reports weren’t even written for 150-400 days. If that’s true, then sadly the case should be dismissed. Sloppiness on the part of an investigation is a horrible thing.
 
Everyone is fallible to error.

And they are only as good as the information provided to them, which was not a complete set of evidence AFAIK.
Interesting that you think they could be in error but how do you feel about LE's errors also known as lies,not going into the house where a body was found on the lawn,not interviewing witnesses for months after a man died,letting said man's shirt lay on floor in hospital to be contaminated,one cop fired for showing bias,not securing a crime scene,no logs kept,collecting evidence in paper bags and plastic cups..........
 
Last edited:
We are each entitled to our opinions, but that's all they are.

The first jury did not unanimously agree that Karen was not guilty of manslaughter, even after hearing ARCCA's testimony.

As yet, it's an undecided matter. But still has nothing to do with my post that you replied to -

And then there's the other aspect, there needs to be a reason for staging, at a time when the defendant did not tell anyone that she saw John going into the house, continued not to make that claim for months, and had not denied hitting him.

Do you have a link for how the first jury voted on counts?
 
Interesting that you think they could be in error but how do you feel about LE's errors also known as lies,not going into the house where a body was found on the lawn,not interviewing witnesses for months after a man died,letting said man's shirt lay on floor in hospital to be contaminated,one cop fired for showing bias,not securing a crime scene,collecting evidence in paper bags and plastic cups..........
This is not addressing my post about expert witnesses.

<modsnip>

IMO
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The blunder was laying the foundation for the remaining tail light pieces to come in via YB instead of via Proctor. Brennan wasn't able to get those pieces in until AJ laid a foundation for him to get them in without objection.
I dont see it as a blunder that Aj entered those tail pieces into the conversation. Many of those pieces were the ones LE waited to "reveal" themselves as time went on.
What the actual..".reveal" themselves?
How about you bring in some heating guns and strainer devices. But no lets do an occassional drive by an unsecured crime scene and see what "develops".
Large chunks just laying there that not even the homeowner sees - it takes Proctor to cruise by with his xray vision -
Not believeable to those of us who are local and underststand the terrain and snow etc
Gosh, even I could have bought the same Lexus part and smashed it and sprinked it about Fairview like fairy dust
There were extra chunks iirc that did not fit
Who waits for physical evidence at a crime scene to reveal itself - its a small front lawn you know the area - get out there and collect it
IMO
 
Last edited:
Appears BH is looking/listening to voice message. Blank bright screen cooralates with that. jmo

@JHall7news


Jury sees images of Higgins leaving Canton PD with what appears to be a cell phone raised to his face at 1:35 am, a few minutes after he arrived.

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
91
Guests online
4,079
Total visitors
4,170

Forum statistics

Threads
622,931
Messages
18,458,187
Members
240,214
Latest member
Roonie91
Back
Top