MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #28 Retrial

[Elliot_Alderson]

This is brilliant. And, please note, that while he is walking and looking at his phone, he is carrying the taillight pieces with him so that over the next couple of weeks, those magical pieces can be found on the lawn near him.

And carrying glasses

 

[rescuemom]

Brendan’s looong redirect of Burgess is just trying to refresh the jury’s memory of what Burgess even said before Alessi absolutely destroyed him, MOO

Most of his redirects have been a regurgitation of his direct to the point it is the same thing over and over. They have so little to present and so far has been an insult to any justice for JOK, IMO.

 

[Warwick7]

Personally, I don’t care what degree someone holds if they’re excellent at what they do and provide accurate information.
It’s not rocket science and ironically Elon Musk holds zero degrees in rocket science.

All IMO

While there’s no shame in not having a college degree, lying about one’s educational accomplishments is bad. When a so-called expert lies about their education and uses that lie to testify under oath before a jury, it is absolutely inexcusable, it's fraud.

 

[kuromiiiilove]

Most of his redirects have been a regurgitation of his direct to the point it is the same thing over and over. They have so little to present and so far has been an insult to any justice for JOK, IMO.

Just the fact that this ‘expert’ witness has not reviewed ANY raw data is kind of shocking to me.

 

[sunshineray]

Let me attempt to explain the significance of this man's CV/LinkedIn discrepancies for you. First of all, it really doesn't have anything to do with the fact that he never graduated college. It's about his reliability as a witness and a "expert" as the CW presents him. If this man has discrepancies on these items, it shows carelessness at best and deception at worst. So this makes everything he says and does suspect.

So for example, you are about to walk down the aisle and marry someone and find out the night before that your fiance cheated on 2 of their former spouses/partners. Would you trust them to be faithful to you?

Does that then mean his data analysis of the two events, the 3-point turn and the backup, are incorrect?

 

[Linda7NJ]

You do realize he stated that none of data reported a collision?

I don’t believe that’s true.
He’s the first guy to take the stand, there’s more coming.

IMO

 

[Leilei]

And carrying glasses

One glass or two, though? Maybe balancing one on his head?
IMO.

 

[Derph]

I don't care what this man says. He could show video evidence that there is a God, BigFoot and Santa Claus and I wouldn't believe him!! He is a proven liar. Nothing he says will ever change that. If he lied about one thing, he lies about everything.

This is the exact same thing all the Anti-KR people have screaming about since day one! " Karen Lied so she MUST be guilty!" Well this guy lied so he MUST be guilty of not telling the truth. I don't care what anyone says. I'm going to hold my breath and stamp my feet like hank brennan on this. Burgess LIED! His facts are based on lies. I don't believe anything he says!

 

[sunshineray]

You do realize he stated that none of data reported a collision?

Yes

 

[arielilane]

Hank Brennan criticizing ARCCA for deleting texts, using encrypted apps & getting a new phone carrier feels like stone throwing in a glass home. I get it’s a compelling argument about discovery and experts but the optics are…interesting

https://twitter.com/x/status/1917311318857482469

 

[Linda7NJ]

Does that then mean his data analysis of the two events, the 3-point turn and the backup, are incorrect?

IMO

NOPE

 

[Elliot_Alderson]

Personally, I don’t care what degree someone holds if they’re excellent at what they do and provide accurate information.
It’s not rocket science and ironically Elon Musk holds zero degrees in rocket science.

All IMO

Invoking Elon Musk is not exactly helping the case

 

[Soulmagent]

Remember last week when the CW was trying to get this guys report in ,and the CW said ,they didnt know how much time they would need him because he had done experiments and made charts and did testing ..etc..Anyone remember ? It was just last week...

 

[sunshineray]

That's a problem. Murder trial. IMO

The jury will decide

 

[Leilei]

I don’t believe that’s true.
He’s the first guy to take the stand, there’s more coming.

IMO

So you're saying that Burgess, the expert witness, was wrong?
IMO.

 

[BUF]

Time for re-cross…and a sidebar, of course

 

[sunshineray]

I tryed but the time stamps are shifting -2 +18.4- 26

In what context is what you wrote?

 

[kuromiiiilove]

Personally, I don’t care what degree someone holds if they’re excellent at what they do and provide accurate information.
It’s not rocket science and ironically Elon Musk holds zero degrees in rocket science.

All IMO

Again, that is a red herring fallacy. No one is saying that Mr. Burgess should not be allowed to testify because he has no degree. The issue is that he has falsified his degree, seemingly for 17 years. We don’t even know right now if Aperture knew when hiring him he had no degree (although that seems unlikely considering the Aperture site listed that he held a degree), if they even would have hired him or put him on the stand.
ETA a couple more fallacies for you:
It’s a non sequitir to say or imply that it doesn’t matter if he falsified his degree, if he is successful in the field.
Lastly, the Elon Musk mention is also a bit of a red herring, especially considering he is a CEO, not a rocket scientist. But it’s also an appeal to authority - this famous person is doing fine without a relevant degree, so it doesn’t matter that this expert witness falsified his CV’s for 17 years!

 

[rescuemom]

...to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty??? This guy does not have an original thought.

 

[keek]

While there’s no shame in not having a college degree, lying about one’s educational accomplishments is bad. When a so-called expert lies about their education and uses that lie to testify under oath before a jury, it is absolutely inexcusable, it's fraud.

Fraud and not to be trusted in his knowledge as we are seeing. Sloppy CW work for sure as well, grab anyone that will work with us. Wonder if they are the first company they met with. NO reputable business with high end stakes such as this one, read their website, can probably never repair this damage to themselves. IMO