- Joined
- Dec 12, 2024
- Messages
- 882
- Reaction score
- 9,308
Oh, and that they will.The jury will decide
Oh, and that they will.The jury will decide
Actually I believe that displays on every expert's CV on the Aperture site. All the ones I've clicked on anyway.Thank you @waldojabba for posting this. And viewing the Aperture LLC website today for this expert, when loading the CV for Shanon Burgess that “Not For Expert Designation” displays on the downloaded CV.
IMO it may be that there will be no further updates to Mr. Burgess’ links or qualifications profile until after payment in full is received from the CW? MOO
Wonder what the turnover rate at Aperture is? or their hiring standards?? so does anyone who can fog a mirror get hired????
So how do you feel about putting out fake creds to the federal court?Actually I believe that displays on every expert's CV on the Aperture site. All the ones I've clicked on anyway.
Stand up guy, eh? Not.Burgess also just completely blamed his company Aperture for the failures. Accepting zero blame.
Nothing is his fault, Burgess is the perpetual victim.Brennan putting the onus back on Aperture to make sure that Burgess’ CV is accurate isn’t a good look. So is the whole company unreliable?
Wow @Angelwatch …… still catching up over here. Wonder if the witness tried to invoke Daylight Savings Time. Not that an hour would really help……. SMH. This is astounding frankly. MOOCan you believe this guy? Calendar drift on top his clock drift.
Absolutely, my findings as well. The watermark is not exclusive to Mr. Burgess.Actually I believe that displays on every expert's CV on the Aperture site. All the ones I've clicked on anyway.
Those designations were put up yesterday afternoon, IIRC.Actually I believe that displays on every expert's CV on the Aperture site. All the ones I've clicked on anyway.
Dang it! I wish I had known it wasn’t bad to ‘misrepresent’ yourself on CV’s! I’d be making 6 figures by now!You just say you're pursuing a degree in X and you're good to go.