MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #28 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
For me the next interesting question is whether Alessi is putting the DiSorga variance calculation to Burgess or not. I am assuming he spent hours on LinkedIn to buy an extra day for whatever they are working on. IMO

Time well spent by Alessi proving this cw witness is a liar and fraud. JMOO
 
Brennen sounded like he wanted to release the scheme for a second. Shrink the screen is what it meant to say.
 
Do we even know what this man's financial situation was when he started college and throughout the years he's taking classes? Did he maybe opted to pay as you go, so he had no student debt, while working different jobs to finance that education and his living expenses?
Red herring. MOO.
 
The amount of time he was taking to get his degree... how he was doing it... why it was taking so long, etc. really doesn't matter if the Degree he said he was pursuing at the University of Alabama doesn't even exist JMO
Maybe he's just been waiting for them to actually add the degree so that he can pursue it?
 
We don't though know what his life was like so your life experience and his could differ greatly. I think it would be valuable to know his life situation before judging.
So we should know his "life situation" before we judge him for lying his pants off??? The guy is a fraud and an insult to the educated, respected experts the defense will be putting on the stand.
 
So the cross from Mr Alessi confirms my belief from the weekend

1162 is locked for 34F and the defence has had to concede that pre-trial.

It really is an argument about some seconds. But big picture, it's hard to see how the reversing event is consistent with anything Karen has said in her videos. Indeed it's more consistent with what she said in her police interview.

MOO
 
Outside of court on Monday, Read was not pleased, accusing special prosecutor Hank Brennan of springing new information about the case on her team at the last minute.

“Attorney Brennan represented to this court and us just last week that he was surprised to get a report on May 8th that was only shared with us on May 11th, and now we find out from this witness that attorney Brennan knew this report was coming the whole time,” Read told reporters. “That’s the definition of an ambush.”

'The definition of an ambush': Read claims prosecutors sprung last-minute information on defense
 
We don't though know what his life was like so your life experience and his could differ greatly. I think it would be valuable to know his life situation before judging.
No one is judging him for not completing his degree. He is being judged because he has misrepresented his education for a decade - claiming education he doesn’t have as justification for making life changing conclusions for other people. Meanwhile, whatever his financial situation was 17 years ago, he now charges upwards of $300 per hour for his fraudulent services.
 
I wonder if the defense is going to put forth any witnesses that will testify that Mr. Burgess's analysis of the data describing these two events, the 3-point turn and backup, are wrong?
 
So the cross from Mr Alessi confirms my belief from the weekend

1162 is locked for 34F and the defence has had to concede that pre-trial.

It really is an argument about some seconds. But big picture, it's hard to see how the reversing event is consistent with anything Karen has said in her videos. Indeed it's more consistent with what she said in her police interview.

MOO
On the surface it seems that they have, but I was listening for that in the cross and Alessi was very careful with saying 'this report' 'this expert', not really saying it was factual.

I think we may have to wait for someone that actually looked at the data. Burgess said he didn't look at the raw data.

JMO
 
No one is judging him for not completing his degree. He is being judged because he has misrepresented his education for a decade - claiming education he doesn’t have as justification for making life changing conclusions for other people. Meanwhile, whatever his financial situation was 17 years ago, he now charges upwards of $300 per hour for his fraudulent services.

But he might have been broke at some point in the last 20 years! Doesn’t that make it ok?
 
The amount of time he was taking to get his degree... how he was doing it... why it was taking so long, etc. really doesn't matter if the Degree he said he was pursuing at the University of Alabama doesn't even exist JMO
BAM!!
He lied, and continued to lie.
Don't forget that he got updates whenever someone checked his LI account, so "out of sight, out of mind" doesn't pass the smell test.
IMO.
 
So we should know his "life situation" before we judge him for lying his pants off??? The guy is a fraud and an insult to the educated, respected experts the defense will be putting on the stand.
In the credentials submitted to the court was it not stated he was still pursuing his degrees?
 
On the surface it seems that they have, but I was listening for that in the cross and Alessi was very careful with saying 'this report' 'this expert', not really saying it was factual.

I think we may have to wait for someone that actually looked at the data. Burgess said he didn't look at the raw data.

JMO

Burgess said that he has it timestamped. If Alessi disagreed, he needed to put that contention to this witness IMO.

While I acknowledge the possibility to argue in the alternative e.g this Brian or that Brian or both Brians, I don't think it's realistic to argue "my client was not driving at high speed in reverse but even if she was it was 20 seconds earlier ... "

Just as a practical matter, I don't think he will do that - nor is it what he said to the Judge.

MOO
 
No one is judging him for not completing his degree. He is being judged because he has misrepresented his education for a decade - claiming education he doesn’t have as justification for making life changing conclusions for other people. Meanwhile, whatever his financial situation was 17 years ago, he now charges upwards of $300 per hour for his fraudulent services.
Did he not submit credentials to the court that list him as still pursuing his degrees?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
192
Guests online
530
Total visitors
722

Forum statistics

Threads
625,593
Messages
18,506,777
Members
240,819
Latest member
Berloni75
Back
Top