MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #28 Retrial

[waldojabba]

But that is not what he has listed on prior CVs. He has likely gotten job opportunities with these fraudulent CVs he had posted all over the internet in the past 17 years. He is deceptive. How am I supposed to trust he is a credible expert witness if I can’t even trust that the company that hired him didn’t know he didn’t have a degree?

You’re drifting from your original point. First it was ‘So what if it’s General Studies?’ Then, when it became clear that there’s no such degree as ‘General Studies in Mathematics and Business,’ you shifted to claiming it was just two minors. Let’s be honest: if a defense witness pulled this, would you be saying the same things? The reality is Burgess misrepresented his credentials, and the Commonwealth is still parading him as an expert. That’s not credible. MOO

BBM Let me emphasis it for those in the" back row "

• Burgess misrepresented his credentials, and the Commonwealth is still parading him as an expert. That’s not credible. MOO

 

[lohrtabitha]

Personal matters always factor into every aspect of one's life, even their professional matters, MO

Well please explain to me why many people get fired if their personal matters factor into their professional lives?

 

[lohrtabitha]

The synced timelines, Lexus and iPhone, of the vechile's arrival motion, stops and motions again leaves no room for JO entering the house. MO

We already have discussed that technology is not foolproof and they aren't ever 100% reliable.

 

[cocomod]

Maybe they can delve into his job reviews and accreditations that they do numerous times a year? Maybe have another expert review Mr. Burgess's data analysis to see if it's correct?

There isn't time for that. Shouldn't the CW have done that once they received his report in January? Wait, they did. They asked him to change it to match current testimony. So, that change occurred during this trial! This "expert" also admitted that he had a conclusion before he started his analysis of the events. He also talked to someone involved to get the story - in other words, what do you want this report to say?

Bottom line, he is a hired hand!! He was told what they wanted the report to say, and he manipulated that data to get that result. He is not even an "expert" and should have not been approved in the first place! When he admitted the errors and admitted that he changed his report, the "judge" should have thrown him out - discounted him completely! He is NOT qualified to do this work!!! IMO

 

[waldojabba]

And unnecessary. IMO

Yes its gone from a ridiculous embarrassment to even beyond that
After the P rests its case and the D asks for Dismissal my fingers are crossed that the dismissal is granted -
Odds are not good - like slim to none..but it would be warranted from what I've seen

JMO

 

[lohrtabitha]

I respectfully recommend that you watch his testimony from today - he had made several "errors" that he tried to explain away.
Just like the several "errors" in his CV.
He's sloppy, fraudulent, and to accept any of his testimony as fact is ridiculous.
IMO.

Yes, throw the cliff notes away and get out the textbook.

 

[tara83]

The disturbing thing to me is what this shows about the justice system. KR is lucky to have this amazing defense team but what happens to a falsely accused person who just has a court appointed attorney. Would they have went to this length to prove how inept this guy is? Imagine someone convicted on this.

 

[Sillybilly]

Hey everyone,

Basic Websleuths rules ...

We need links to EVERY SINGLE IMAGE, otherwise the image has to be removed.

 

[arielilane]

View attachment 587358 On redirect, Brennan asked Burgess about one of his qualifications and seemed surprised when Burgess said no, he did not have it. I wonder why…Oh wait, he lists this ‘Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator’ cert as a professional certification on his CV!

To be clear, he answered "not currently" to the hacking cert.

timestamp (beginning of ADA Brennan's redirect)

 

[missy1974]

If Burgess never did analysis of any raw data, and only read others work, does he really present an independent opinion, or does he just fabricate a conclusion that fits the narrative the prosecution brings forward?

AKA confirmation bias. MOO

This is why I am not sure if the defense is conceding that 1162 is the right time. He is using other reports that have concluded 1162 was that night, but Burgess did not independently review the raw data.

I went back the ARCCA hearing to figure out what exactly ARCCA was asked to do by the defense. They were given the raw data to figure out.

 

[mzmarymac]

Let me attempt to explain the significance of this man's CV/LinkedIn discrepancies for you. First of all, it really doesn't have anything to do with the fact that he never graduated college. It's about his reliability as a witness and a "expert" as the CW presents him. If this man has discrepancies on these items, it shows carelessness at best and deception at worst. So this makes everything he says and does suspect.

So for example, you are about to walk down the aisle and marry someone and find out the night before that your fiance cheated on 2 of their former spouses/partners. Would you trust them to be faithful to you?

 

[arielilane]

1:11:18 hi Allan subsequent to our conversation on Wednesday the US attorney's office asked we pause any further conversation till we received additional information from their office regarding how our involvement will move
forward

Now, it's not the opinion that troubles me it's the relationship and commonwealth would have an even playing field



Saturday June 22nd, Daniel Wolf writes -- Allan I spent some time this morning put putting


together a brief outline of my qualifications also attach my DNT list I obviously


won't say what the responses verbatim but I gave you a general sense of what my response would be again I thought


your questioning during the voir dire was fantastic so please feel free to make whatever changes you feel


necessary


Now this isn't information provided by the defense and reciprocal Discovery this is information provided


by the federal government after numerous requests two requests and and consistent

the best I can to get as much information as I can we then I provided an

outline an outline of questions and answers for a direct examination the Commonwealth did not

have the luxury to privilege did not even know that there was an outline that was being disseminated by this totally

independent witness who took no side other than that of the truth

what follows from this outline is then the outline with remarks from this independent expert who knows nobody


so we see in the margins in the notes this fair-minded objective witness says


So not being to not being able to inspect the vehicle is something

that's not uncommon in your line of work and he writes absolutely not and then he comments not sure if you want to put this somewhere in the direct examination

I have a feeling they the Commonwealth are going to argue I didn't personally

inspect the vehicle I had enough information from the material I review so it wasn't necessary need to show the

jury it doesn't matter in this case


Judge Cannone: what's the date of that?

Attorney Brennan: it's not dated it's not dated the Touhy request is a recent February response, but they send random documents there's no real accounting now


Attorney Brennan: I'm not saying that undermines the conclusions of ARCCA or not I'm not saying they're not qualified witnesses, but it certainly shows some bias

 

[Warwick7]

Yes its gone from a ridiculous embarrassment to even beyond that
After the P rests its case and the D asks for Dismissal my fingers are crossed that the dismissal is granted -
Odds are not good - like slim to none..but it would be warranted from what I've seen

JMO

This Judge will never dismiss this.

 

[keek]

They didn't give a second's thought to Lucky, the plow driver, whether they (ALBERTS) knew he'd be out plowing or another person. They just knew, plow: JOK. That plower would of undergone horrific to him and his family legal interrogation, job loss most likely and lifelong trauma. IF KR had not gone looking for JOK and found him first. ANYONE could of driven by later and spotted him and called 911. Thing is, KR got there first and her hysterical and frantic mind and devious thinking JMc, made it where it is today. SO, bottom line, they were ready to point JOK's death on ANYONE convenient. How the go about their lives. IMO

 

[arielilane]

Karen Read’s attorneys fight back against allegations they lied to judge​

 

[keek]

You musn't be able to be a witness and say, 'I'm all set' and get up and leave. I did keep thinking Burgess would do that yesterday. He is sticking it out one way or another. IMO

 

[Warwick7]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1924889371037020265

 

[sunshineray]

According to which time drift? The 2 second one? The 8 second? Or what about the 16-21 second variance?

Did you hear, at any point, Burgess explaining why the time drift varies when comparing the same two devices? Or is it Trooper Paul all over again: ‘It just is’?

He actually explained it yesterday during his direct testimony. The variables are just that variables. When analyzing data from different clocks they usually vary. That's why they state the variances and how they subsequently analyzed to try and synced them, sometimes using videos and then using the Lexus clock itself. I'm interested in whether there's testimony contradicting Mr. Burgess's data analysis. I'm thinking there's not, which is why the defense wants to hang him high on his misstated online credentials. AJMO

 

[sunshineray]

Well please explain to me why many people get fired if their personal matters factor into their professional lives?

And many aren't.

 

[kuromiiiilove]

Brendan’s looong redirect of Burgess is just trying to refresh the jury’s memory of what Burgess even said before Alessi absolutely destroyed him, MOO