I prefer Law&Crime channel on youtubeI'm working from home today, so its the first opportunity I have to actually have it on in the background. Is there an alternative place to watch?
I prefer Law&Crime channel on youtubeI'm working from home today, so its the first opportunity I have to actually have it on in the background. Is there an alternative place to watch?
Maybe it's the witness on the stand and the more detailed data being explained?Whats up with CourtTV? Why are they so pro-CW?
I don't have the attention span to listen to this expert. His slides are hard to read. The questioning and the answers are confusing. Too much data. Not good explanations. I'll continue to listen while I work, but wow, this is not clearly presented.The guy needs to cut to the chase - he lost me 45 minutes ago altho I am still listening with half an ear. He did inspect the car/visit the site /take umpteen pictures ( and maybe took a side trip to ride the swan boats in Boston Garden lol)
From what I gather all of Welcher's timing of events is based upon Shanon's timing.
Which then muddies the water for me. But I will continue to listen
I look forward to Alessi's cross -hopefully today if this speeds up.
JMO
I find this latest reconstructionist extremely obtuse. And would imagine the jury does as well. JMOOYes, I was just adding we have a much more educated reconstructionist on the stand right now, which I perceive as a good thing.
Nope. That's not it.Maybe it's the witness on the stand and the more detailed data being explained?
Yes and the defense seems very worried about that data, explained by this witness. JMO
I am also behind and noticed thisI'm a fair bit behind and just saw the enlarged techstream chart with the trigger, I noticed the last column had "kph' instead of mph, does he mention if the kph was converted to mph?
VERYY pro CW!Whats up with CourtTV? Why are they so pro-CW?
Agree. And Alessi was NOT happy this morning, I could hear it in his voice. They must have had a point considering there was a short voir dire, which I am sure we will hear more about why that was done later? I hope so.whenever defense appears upset, some in thread assume it must mean something coming out soon is "bad" for karen. they don't stop to wonder if the attorneys are upset purely based on the fact that this trial is violently unfair, and bev is allowing things for CW that defense wouldn't dream of doing themselves.
Replying to myself.. I see the column for mph nowI am also behind and noticed this
Megabits & megabytes are the same thing just like mph and kph.I'm a fair bit behind and just saw the enlarged techstream chart with the trigger, I noticed the last column had "kph' instead of mph, does he mention if the kph was converted to mph?
No.So they have the Odometer read for trigger two in 1162 key cycle.
Looks like he runs through all the journeys to get the final mileage on seizure to match the final mileage.
Just another corroboration for when Trigger 2 occurred.
i.e at 34F
Justifiably so I might add. JMOOI've seen many defense objections sustained in the prosecution's direct examination of it's witnesses in this second trial.
No.
What I heard was the expert's opinion is: that striking John would have been a minimal impact and wouldn't trigger an event to register. M00
He will get well above the 75KI hope Alessi asks that and did you know Brennan gets 75,000 paid by the taxpayers just to prosecute this one case? Here's how much Hank Brennan will get paid to prosecute Karen Read in second trial. Man oh man, if I was a taxpayer there I would be fuming mad!!!!
The judge is running a tight ship and making sure there's foundation for all questions, defense and prosecution, MO.Justifiably so I might add. JMOO
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.