That's why I wrote, at some point after 87 feet.Per JW testimony he did not say the Lexus only traveled 87 feet. He said he didn't know how far it would have continued on. JMOO
That's why I wrote, at some point after 87 feet.Per JW testimony he did not say the Lexus only traveled 87 feet. He said he didn't know how far it would have continued on. JMOO
I've yet to hear him address a broken headlight. Wasn't that the latest contoversy in witness testimony? His demonstartion wants us to look at an intact headlight. Bizarre and unbelievable, IMOI think it's to test under the same conditions, as far as possible. To see if anything affects the outcome that wouldn't necessarily be obvious otherwise, such as how clothing might inter-react or change outcome, for instance on the jeans there was a scratch on the car where there was a metal stud, and IMO as regards other clothing for instance - a cap peak might hit somewhere, certain shoe soles might affect movement, a shirt sleeve length might receive damage etc. I believe that is how scientific tests are conducted by replicating all details as far as possible. Otherwise, you would get a defence lawyer saying 'but you weren't wearing the same jeans the victim was wearing, so how can you compare the two?'
I don't think he engaged in subliminal messaging. There is no evidence for him being unprofessional or biased. JMO
The size of a postage stamp!I will have to look later to see if we have actual distances in that area. Like how wide of a lot was the Albert's yard? or the neighbour's yard? It's so much easier to visualize to have a comparison like that. The CW didn't do that![]()
87 feet came from his testimony on direct.I don't know where the 87 feet reverse drive came from. Lets keep the data reported straight so it doesnt mislead those reading the posts. Welcher said, " It went 34 feet forward, then it came back another 53 feet past where it went."
Thanks I missed the clarification. Welcher was spouting off so many things, it was hard to follow. That being said, I find it hard to believe that all that traversing happened especially knowing that these event data recorders have been proven unreliable over the years. Here is an article attesting to that:No.. the data shows 34 feet forward...
Then 34 PLUS another 53 feet... a total of 87 feet in reverse ( these are minimum distances because when the data started, the car was already in forward motion and still in reverse motion when it stopped)
Alessi had him clarify yesterday, because in his direct testimony, it did sound like only reversed 53 feet.
Thanks for the clarification but I don't believe that the data is correct when these boxes have been proven to be unreliable. Toyota appears to do an about-face on reliability of black boxes in its vehicles87 feet came from his testimony on direct.
He said that the techstream data from the SUV showed that the car travelled a total of 87 feet. The car traveled forward about 35 feet before shifting into reverse and traveling a total of 87 feet backwards, according to Welcher.
Link: MSN
Thanks I missed the clarification. Welcher was spouting off so many things, it was hard to follow. That being said, I find it hard to believe that all that traversing happened especially knowing that these event data recorders have been proven unreliable over the years. Here is an article attesting to that:
![]()
Toyota appears to do an about-face on reliability of black boxes in its vehicles
Toyota appears to do an about-face on reliability of black boxes in its vehicleswww.latimes.com
So Dr Welcher uses Trooper Paul’s odometer photo/log (12,665) as the basis for his interpretation of events. He subtracted mileage from the odometer to arrive at the start odometer reading of 12,629. It’s based on TP’s CARS analysis.
Alessi is pointing out how many of Welcher’s reports are rooted in the deduction of the odometer. So they’ll use TP’s odometer, but not his sworn key cycle of 1164? That’s an issue!So Dr Welcher uses Trooper Paul’s odometer photo/log (12,665) as the basis for his interpretation of events. He subtracted mileage from the odometer to arrive at the start odometer reading of 12,629. It’s based on TP’s CARS analysis.
It’s sounding like he copy/pasted TP’s report and added some new ‘experiments’ MOOSo we don't have some new infallible information as was purported to me a few days ago?
That's why I wrote, at some point after 87 feet.
oh.....great info. And the good Dr can just create charts from thin air. Can this come in at this late date??Thanks I missed the clarification. Welcher was spouting off so many things, it was hard to follow. That being said, I find it hard to believe that all that traversing happened especially knowing that these event data recorders have been proven unreliable over the years. Here is an article attesting to that:
![]()
Toyota appears to do an about-face on reliability of black boxes in its vehicles
Toyota appears to do an about-face on reliability of black boxes in its vehicleswww.latimes.com
And yet the Lexus continued on according to JW. See previous links that were provided.87 feet came from his testimony on direct.
He said that the techstream data from the SUV showed that the car travelled a total of 87 feet. The car traveled forward about 35 feet before shifting into reverse and traveling a total of 87 feet backwards, according to Welcher.
Link: MSN