I'm so excited for this!!A new witness is expected on the stand Monday morning. We know that it's a witness who did not testify in the first trial, a former Canton police officer.
We asked Read outside of court Friday about what we can expect from them, and she responded with, "You'll see."
![]()
Childhood friend reads Michael Proctor's texts at Karen Read trial
The defense continued making its case Monday after the prosecution rested last week.www.nbcboston.com
Probably because Brennan is trying to make it seem like he was just fired for those comments, not for investigative misconduct and day drinking on the job…NOW??? Hank is bringing up that MP was fired?
Objection! from Yanetti
See, if I kill 3000 people but I let one live, that doesn't mean I'm not a murderer just as JBC making one ruling for the defense doesn't mean she is suddenly fair. JMOHard to reconcile this decision with the idea the Judge is biased or corrupt.
She could easily have kept these out, but did not because she made the decision on the merits as she sees them. Brennan could be justifiably miffed with the decision.
Absolutely key decision for the defence as it seems they are scared to call Proctor for some reason.
IMO
Lets's goooooooo! Woot Woot!
I wasn't sure she would be able to deny that after letting others testify about group messages. JMO But I'm still surprised LOL
Aware of optics and public sentiment and trying to CYA doesn’t = not biased. MOO.See, if I kill 3000 people but I let one live, that doesn't mean I'm not a murderer just as JBC making one ruling for the defense doesn't mean she is suddenly fair. JMO
The CW was also scared to call their own lead investigator?Hard to reconcile this decision with the idea the Judge is biased or corrupt.
She could easily have kept these out, but did not because she made the decision on the merits as she sees them. Brennan could be justifiably miffed with the decision.
Absolutely key decision for the defence as it seems they are scared to call Proctor for some reason.
IMO
Think we need a source for "easily kept these out." Any legal commentary on this, even from Court TV which is notoriously pro-CW, discussed how bad HB's argument was and how the judge would be straining to find any legal backing to keep the texts outHard to reconcile this decision with the idea the Judge is biased or corrupt.
She could easily have kept these out, but did not because she made the decision on the merits as she sees them. Brennan could be justifiably miffed with the decision.
Absolutely key decision for the defence as it seems they are scared to call Proctor for some reason.
IMO
I think it's just a matter of law. There was really no way she couldn't allow them when she has already allowed others to do the same. IMOAware of optics and public sentiment and trying to CYA doesn’t = not biased. MOO.
It appears to me that YB opened that door during his direct by brennan as he talked about it and even admitted to being disciplined because of his involvement in it and for not properly supervising proctor. YB even read parts of it.Hard to reconcile this decision with the idea the Judge is biased or corrupt.
She could easily have kept these out, but did not because she made the decision on the merits as she sees them. Brennan could be justifiably miffed with the decision.
Absolutely key decision for the defence as it seems they are scared to call Proctor for some reason.
IMO