Parts got read. I posted yb's testimony a few posts back.Very confused with all that’s going on so far as I’m just watching now. Did those texts from proctor get read? Or only some? I thought his friends would have to read them or something
BBMSo if the Judge rules against the CW it's to avoid looking compromised
And if she rules for the CW is because she is biased and or corrupt?
Isn't it more likely she's just ruling on the merits as she sees them? The Judge has significant latitude on these decisions and certainly does not care what Court TV or Twitter thinks.
One of her main objectives is to avoid any appealable error, which is, I am sure, one significant factor in why she ruled this way. Ditto why she kept out the FBI expert - there is no authority to allow it, and the Judge isn't going to make a novel decision at trial court level in this case.
IMO
It's not surprising to me the the CW is not calling Proctor after his disgrace (and possible investigations still currently going on) It does greatly surprise me, considering all that, that the defense doesn't want him on the stand. JMOIn turn, isn't the lead detective the cornerstone of the cw case? I would think the jury believes he is a very important part of the prosecution and they should hear from him, if he is alive. JMOO
It's not surprising to me the the CW is not calling Proctor after his disgrace (and possible investigations still currently going on) It does greatly surprise me, considering all that, that the defense doesn't want him on the stand. JMO
He would just be a hostile witness if the defense called him.. Guess they don't want the headache he would bring. But the cw not calling their ex lead detective is surprising. Looks really bad on the cw. JMOOIt's not surprising to me the the CW is not calling Proctor after his disgrace (and possible investigations still currently going on) It does greatly surprise me, considering all that, that the defense doesn't want him on the stand. JMO
She is disgracing herself. JMOOOof she’s awful imo. Unprofessional.
I don't think LE needed to pin anything with the tail light. That evidence was there at the scene, around and on the victim. More evidence is in the timeline and video (no tail light shards found at Meadows). AJMOExactly- it is possible that LE did try to pin it more solidly on KR with the tail light evidence, but that doesn’t mean she didn’t bump him with her car. Nor does it mean LE killed him themselves and tried to frame her for a murder they committed.
I’m coming into this case late- only in the last week or so. I’ve not watched all the press coverage or circus that seems to be taking place. I have no pony in the race,
I’m interested in seeing how the science/math evidence is presented.
It is clear that there are strong sides- those for and against. Many posts here show clear bias because a side has been chosen. Which is fine- but tough to be objective about what is good science if you want you side to win.
IMO
As far as that text chain the defense wants in, I respectfully disagree. MOProctor does not need to be called for the evidence of his many misdeeds to be presented.