Madeleine McCann: German Prisoner Identified as Suspect, #41

For those who didn't follow the other CB thread, I'll leave this here for reference. If researching 'sexual preference disorder' see 'pararphilic disorder', which is the updated term.


"Forensic psychiatrist Dr Christian Riedemann, 54, told the court Christian is ‘extremely dangerous’, and added he has a ‘sexual preference disorder’ which also had ‘sadistic and paedophilic elements’.......
*************************
As he nears the end of his seven-year sentence for the 2005 rape of a pensioner, the only way German authorities could keep him in prison would be if court psychiatric expert, Dr Christian Riedemann, deems him too 'dangerous' for society.......

It was also revealed that Brueckner scored nearly 100 per cent on a test where just over 60 per cent suggests the subject is a psychopath.
'The application of various procedures leads to the conclusion that Christian Brueckner can be categorized in the absolute top league of dangerousness', the expert said...........
************************
The probability that B. would then be imprisoned again in the next two years is 30 to 50 percent, the expert said. According to established analysis procedures, almost 100 percent of comparable sex offenders have more favorable prognoses than the defendant................

As the psychiatrist said, the accused was more involved with illegal than legal things in his life. The doctor did not even want to quote from texts attributed to him in court. For him, what he had read in them was one of the greatest abominations he knew....................

According to the (prison) file entries, Christian B. considers himself innocent and assumes that he will be compensated. He is said to have threatened to "finish off this prison". He is said to have described staff at the facility as torturers.



 
Last edited:

MET reckons HCW had an hypothesis that's all that CB did for MM with no evidence to support it.

Madeleine McCann: Former detective brands search 'pointless' and based on 'sketchy' information​

Former British Police detective Mark Williams-Thomas, who has worked on some of the world's most high profile missing persons cases, has given his take on the new searches for Madeleine McCann​




 
Last edited:

MET reckons HCW had an hypothesis that's all that CB did for MM with no evidence to support it.

Madeleine McCann: Former detective brands search 'pointless' and based on 'sketchy' information​

Former British Police detective Mark Williams-Thomas, who has worked on some of the world's most high profile missing persons cases, has given his take on the new searches for Madeleine McCann​





MWT - The ex cop who produced a documentary claiming CB had an alibi on May 3 but failed, in his own documentary, to establish a concrete alibi.
 
IFrom Denis' post
I find that last paragraph interesting, as are the follow-up articles, accessible by clicking on the blue text.
 

MET reckons HCW had an hypothesis that's all that CB did for MM with no evidence to support it.

Madeleine McCann: Former detective brands search 'pointless' and based on 'sketchy' information​

Former British Police detective Mark Williams-Thomas, who has worked on some of the world's most high profile missing persons cases, has given his take on the new searches for Madeleine McCann​






How does he know they found nothing? The material is on the way to Germany and not even analysed?
 
MWT - The ex cop who produced a documentary claiming CB had an alibi on May 3 but failed, in his own documentary, to establish a concrete alibi.
The media gets things wrong very often. Some of what MWT writes is sensational but so too is the work of JC - at the Arade search he suggested that several bodies would be found. He was a fair way off the mark on that one.
 
How does he know they found nothing? The material is on the way to Germany and not even analysed?
I’ve struggled to gauge MWT’s stance over the years.

If I remember rightly, over the years he’s

Said McCann’s are innocent
Suggested MM left apartment on her own accord
Said SY case against CB should be classed as a murder case (to Eamond Holmes channel 4 or 5)
Called out trolling groups on Facebook
Said on ITV that CB had an alibi but also said the alibi can’t account for his whereabouts on the night (eh!?)
Said CB is innocent
Said the searches are pointless
 
The below image is from the boot of CB’s Jag.

It was reported on the Australian 60 Minutes programme that they contain ether.

Does anyone know where there is a higher resolution image. I think it’s possible to identify the chemicals from the UN number on the labels - all dangerous goods must carry the ID number to be transported.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2885.webp
    IMG_2885.webp
    27.9 KB · Views: 24
The below image is from the boot of CB’s Jag.

It was reported on the Australian 60 Minutes programme that they contain ether.

Does anyone know where there is a higher resolution image. I think it’s possible to identify the chemicals from the UN number on the labels - all dangerous goods must carry the ID number to be transported.
I’ve added the link for the new 60 minutes documentary .

 

MET reckons HCW had an hypothesis that's all that CB did for MM with no evidence to support it.

Madeleine McCann: Former detective brands search 'pointless' and based on 'sketchy' information​

Former British Police detective Mark Williams-Thomas, who has worked on some of the world's most high profile missing persons cases, has given his take on the new searches for Madeleine McCann​




MWT is bla-bla; his rant is about funds and about police who should be doing their job in regards to other cases.

"Portuguese and British police have never given a comment to agree that this is a murder investigation..."

Well, what must one expect, when you know that CB's next door neighbour used to be a Scotland Yard detective?
Agreeing with BKA to a murder investigation is for the British the same as admitting that a SY detective had blindly lived next door to a vile, violent, sadistic, twisted mind as CB.
And Portuguese police blindly let CB carry out his filthy doings for years.
 
The hair - Dismissing CB's cat theory (unless it had velcro or double-sided sticky fur). How on earth could anyone explain how his hair ended up in DM's bed? It couldn't have wafted in on the PDL breeze. It was damning evidence and helped secure his conviction, instead of going round in circles over this I've yet to hear any other theory or explanation from anyone as to how it could have got there.
If you think about it, there is a perfectly logical explanation and I'm surprised it wasn't put forward as a key part of his defence.
 
The hair - Dismissing CB's cat theory (unless it had velcro or double-sided sticky fur). How on earth could anyone explain how his hair ended up in DM's bed? It couldn't have wafted in on the PDL breeze. It was damning evidence and helped secure his conviction, instead of going round in circles over this I've yet to hear any other theory or explanation from anyone as to how it could have got there.
DNA transfer is possible, he was living in the area.

My point is that if it’s possible to dismiss acquittals, as happens often on this forum, then the same logic should be allowable with convictions.

If CB was wrongly convicted in the DM case, which I accept is a long shot, it does put a different perspective on him as a criminal.
 
DNA transfer is possible, he was living in the area.

My point is that if it’s possible to dismiss acquittals, as happens often on this forum, then the same logic should be allowable with convictions.

If CB was wrongly convicted in the DM case, which I accept is a long shot, it does put a different perspective on him as a criminal.
But he was not and is not wrongly committed. DNA transfer is not so easy! Otherwise they would have found the DNA of everyone living in the vicinity. This is absurd imo.
 
To set the record straight - he sexually abused at least 2 children and he was charged for sexual abuse. I cannot even believe that you are minimising this. His criminal history is there and known - he is a vile evil psychopath who abused children. He is not a petty criminal .
I am not minimising anything. I have provided a credible source material to support my opinion. If you have a different view and you can support it, please do so.
 
But he was not and is not wrongly committed. DNA transfer is not so easy! Otherwise they would have found the DNA of everyone living in the vicinity. This is absurd imo.
The hair is the only hard evidence underpinning CB as a serious violent criminal.
 
But he was not and is not wrongly committed. DNA transfer is not so easy! Otherwise they would have found the DNA of everyone living in the vicinity. This is absurd imo.
You don't know that.
On this occassion you are choosing to believe the findings of the court, but as is argued on here in connection with CB's recent trial, courts can make mistakes.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
160
Guests online
528
Total visitors
688

Forum statistics

Threads
625,584
Messages
18,506,593
Members
240,818
Latest member
wilson.emily3646
Back
Top