Isabelle
Verified registered nurse
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 8,691
- Reaction score
- 1,700
This is just so bizarre to not have found anything yet. To me anyway. jmo
Today I have wondered if maybe they don't want to find anything.
This is just so bizarre to not have found anything yet. To me anyway. jmo
What about the Black Box, Flight Data Recorder, wouldn't it send out a signal/beacon?
Today I have wondered if maybe they don't want to find anything.
The plane was 40 minutes into its flight when it suddenly dropped off the radar. The flight was about 6 hours long.
The information that the flight was 2 hours into it's travel time was incorrect reporting.
Wow - they are all still reporting 2 hours - NBC, BBC, etc.
http://www.straitstimes.com/breakin...s-plane-timeline-events-flight-mh370-20140309
12.40 am - Flight MH370, a Boeing 777-200 carrying 227 passengers from 14 nationalities along with 12 crew members, took off from the Malaysian capital, Kuala Lumpur.
1.22 am - The plane was meant to transfer to Vietnam's Ho Chi Minh air traffic control but never appeared.
2.41 am - Malaysian air traffic control in Subang lost contact with the plane, some two hours after it left Kuala Lumpur
BBM
Just another example of not believing everything you read
What time did that other airliner communicate with them? They were apparently the last ones to make contact.
Interesting also that the ticket holders chose Germany and Denmark as their destinations which would seem plausible with the real holders of those passports, but would also cost a lot more money than if the ultimate destinations had been Beijing, for example. Also curious if the Italian, Miraldi, had been to Denmark before his passport was stolen and therefore that is why the impostor booked Copenhagen as his destination?
:waitasec:
MOO
The important part is not where the final destinations were to on the tickets. What is important is that on the day before the flight two tickets are purchased using the same online website within a short duration. Despite the fact that the tickets were to different final destinations, they shared the same first leg flight. Coincidentally, those people are using stolen passports.
It doesn't prove anything in terms of them being responsible, but it does look suspicious.
Today I have wondered if maybe they don't want to find anything.
What about the Black Box, Flight Data Recorder, wouldn't it send out a signal/beacon?
You would think there would be a computer program in place that would automatically search the stolen passport database, detect and alert within seconds once it is scanned. I find it insane that there isn't.
It does, but you have to be near it to get it. That's really stupid in this day and age. Also, it runs on a battery so the signal will eventually die out. I don't know how long they last, but I'd think at least several days.
What do those destinations mean - Frankfurt and Copenhagen? From Beijing?
I'm lost. Although both cities are terrorist hubs imo.
There is - Interpol
Malaysian Airport didn't use it !
Having travelled in those areas I'm not sure why you'd go from Malaysia to Europe via Beijing anyway - a bit out of the way! There are plenty of direct flights from Kuala Lumpur to Amsterdam/London/other European cities. And why go from Thailand all the way down to KL when you could just fly direct from Bangkok?
There's no doubt they were up to something dodgy travelling on someone elses passport... rule drugs out (why go through multiple airports/customs?), perhaps they believed South China airline to be more lax than others with security.