Many thanks to the UK, US, Australia, Japan, (missing anyone?) for their tireless searching of data and oceans- otherwise we may not have ever gotten answers.
IMO.
first thing I see today in the MAL guy giving what is the standard annoncement ...soory to advise fight c has crashed at b and there are no survivors.
He leaves.
Lemmon comes back with what happened to flight 370 we still have no idea..................................
what did I miss in the interium???
CCTVNEWS ‏@cctvnews 4m
Video: Relatives in Beijing are devastated and refuse to believe the missing aircraft ended in southern Indian Ocean https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AL4ZbEgzBG4&feature=youtu.be
CCTVNEWS ‏@cctvnews 4m
China's Foreign Ministry demands Malaysia provide information, evidence on #MH370. China will continue its search operations.
https://twitter.com/cctvnews
I understand this b/c without any proof, how can they just take their word?
Many thanks to the UK, US, Australia, Japan, (missing anyone?) for their tireless searching of data and oceans- otherwise we may not have ever gotten answers.
IMO.
:facepalm:
Lemmon was right - we stlll have no idea.
I would venture to say that, in public, there are probably more questions now than before.
However, we don't know what they know and we don't know what information they've given directly to the families.
The Inmarsat VP seemed very sure that the plane took Southern route. He said "no way" it took Northern route.
Malaysian PM and Malaysian officials say Southern routh.
US seems to think Southern route - they sent planes and ships there.
Aussies think Southern route for sure.
So I guess we can conclude that whatever information they all have, it points directly to Southern route.
JMO.
Prime Ministers statement
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ff3e02-b35e-11e3-8020-b2d790b3c9e1_story.html
I think he could be using the term 'new data' in a confusing manner where new data came from a reanalysis of the same data they had.
Jim Clancy on CNN just talking about delay of officials in declaring the plane missing.
I just keep thinking - when they couldn't find 370 on radar, what if they had sent a fighter jet shortly afterward to go look for it?
How different the ending might have been. Well, we do not know what would have happened even then so I guess so use in thinking about it. It could have ended up with the same end result either way, we don't know.
http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2014/03/24/Missing-MH370-Air-Security/
from this link ((used in previous post))
India revealed that Nicobar and Andaman radar was turned off because of the high cost off electricity to run the radar -- it seems this loss of MH370 was more political than we all realize because none of the neighboring countries wanted to share information about their radar technological abilities or disabilities. Perception is everything in national defence. According to this link Malaysia revealed more than may have been astute under normal circumstances.
Ouch....
looks like Malaysian Air Force is buying new planes ((MH370 fiasco quoted in this article as reason for new planes for Air Force))
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/malaysia-receives-first-2-su30mkms-03336/
AndMIT aeronautics and astronautics professor Dr R. John Hansman says MH370 did not have to cross the airspace of other countries as it could have remained over international waters away from countries or military radar.
AndHe points out too that if any other country had switched off their radar to cut costs, in all likelihood they would not disclose this information to other countries, because it would not look good on them and their military.
As Soejatman rightly points out, “defence is not just about capability, but also hiding such capability or the lack of it”. He notes that no country will publicly admit to using classified technologies to find the aircraft.
But the apparent failure of Malaysia, which has a defence agreement with Britain, to notice that the plane had changed direction, fallen off the radar and then flown towards and through its air space has identified serious loopholes in its air defences.
I want to hear from Imarsat directly. How did they come by their conclusions and when exactly they told Malaysian authorites?
I am sure it is not just the British satellite information that has led to this conclusion. There could be other countries who have supplied information but do not want it to be made public.
There must have been information which led to so many countries paying millions to put their ships and planes in this area over a week ago.
With all the brilliant minds ((seriously I have utmost respect for those gifted souls who work in hi tech)) who have been working on this - I want to believe their conclusion.
I do not envy the searchers who must be really working on adrenaline at this point to find real proof so that they can locate the black box (we all want that the most I think at this point).
What I find daunting is the amount of debris that has been reported and how much is out there.
Indian Ocean garbage patch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
when you look at this map of the vortex of the patch off the western coast of Australia it is hair raising.