I disagree. I think Dr. P is way wrapped up into the Sievers’ business and personal lives and with all the wife swapping going on, I don’t find him credible at all. He said on the stand that he wasn’t very close to Mark, but he was close enough to share his wife and the keys to his home.
He looked like a credible witness on the stand because the jury doesn’t know the background. I thought he came across dishonest. I don’t think it’s good for the state for him to be called again. But I guess it depends whether the defense will bring up those topics or not.