Oh Lord, now that is just wrong!close_enough said:my son said he heard a radio station giving away T-shirts this morning that say "I'm Mel Gibson's designated driver"....

Oh Lord, now that is just wrong!close_enough said:my son said he heard a radio station giving away T-shirts this morning that say "I'm Mel Gibson's designated driver"....
Buzzm1 said:Ig anyone finds a picture of Officer Mee, please post it. I want to make sure it is the same guy. If so, he is speaking out both sides of his mouth.
Thats right!JBean said:Hey it just occured to me..they didn't even give him a speeding ticket!
close_enough said:LOL, well i never thought it that way, but i guess you could say they are "exceptional drunks"....
i've been known to get intoxicated every now & then, myself...i don't drink & drive...use too, but haven't in several years, after having a car wreck..i'm very thankful i never hurt or killed anyone on the roads..
JBean said:They never drink and drive. I know that because if they cannot get a cab or a ride from a friend, guess who they call at 3 am?
That's the same guy JBean.JBean said:Ahandwritten account by the sheriffs deputy who arrested Mel Gibson triggered a lengthy debate among department officials Friday over how much should be released about the actors allegedly profane and anti-Jewish comments, sources close to the investigation said Monday.
The officials ultimately decided to place a portion of Deputy James Mees report under lock and key in an effort to prevent immediate public disclosure, the sources said. They declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the case.
They were like chickens running around with their heads cut off, said one source, who was at the station and witnessed the discussion in the hours after Gibson was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving
http://www.johnandkenshow.com/
Yikes!!!Liz said:Bless them! Best that they call you for a ride, then to bail them out on DUI charges. Thankfully the woman that picked them up wasn't some psycho, Helen (?) Wuornos type.![]()
Liz said:I'm glad you were able to laugh c_e. I didn't mean that to come off as derogatory-sounding as it may have. Truly didn't mean any offense to you, your friends or acquaintences. I meant that they must be exceptional people when drunk, because I think they are truly the exception to the rule. I'll add, good for them!
you know reading some of these articles you are exactly right. This guy is full of it. Lord only knows what song he'll be singing.Buzzm1 said:That's the same guy JBean.
I guess he will be making some money, huh?JBean said:you know reading some of these articles you are exactly right. This guy is full of it. Lord only knows what song he'll be singing.
JBean said:Hey it just occured to me..they didn't even give him a speeding ticket!
Seems like he was ripe for an NE front page.JBean said:you know reading some of these articles you are exactly right. This guy is full of it. Lord only knows what song he'll be singing.
Yes that is what I have been reading. One problem is mel admitted that he was drunk. Every defense lawyer in town went nuts with that i am sure.Liz said:I noticed that earlier but thought it might be totally separate from any of the DUI related charges.
IF Officer Mee didn't site Mel for the speeding, if in fact he truly was, he did him a huge favor.
Robert Shapiro was just on Greta and said that the laws in CA changed about a year ago to state that IF the DUI charges were combined with speeding in excess of 20+ mph over the limit (or reckless driving), there is a mandatory six months in jail.
Sooo ... IF, in fact, he wasn't charged with speeding then there was no probable cause to have pulled him over. And therefore it would seem a good lawyer may just be able to get him off on the DUI charges.
Hmmmm....
JBean said:Yes that is what I have been reading. One problem is mel admitted that he was drunk. Every defense lawyer in town went nuts with that i am sure.
Oh I 'm sorry i see what you;re saying. But just because they didn't sight him for speeding, they can still say he was speeding. They could also just say he was weaving.Liz said:I'm not sure it would have anything to do with any admission of drunkedness. Just wondering if the technicality in itself may be enough to have the charges dropped.
JBean said:Oh I 'm sorry i see what you;re saying. But just because they didn't sight him for speeding, they can still say he was speeding. They could also just say he was weaving.
Oh they have the option of charging them or not. They can just say they were going to warn him, but not ticketing him wouldn't change the fact that he was speeding.Liz said:If the fact is that he was not charged, then I'm not so sure that would fly in a court of law.
But then, IF Mel doesn't retain an attorney to fight the charges, then it's a moot point.
But, I would still like to know ...
So, IF any legal eagles or LE are reading, I'd love to hear from them.
JBean said:Oh they have the option of charging them or not. They can just say they were going to warn him, but not ticketing him wouldn't change the fact that he was speeding.
LOL! I am just thinking out loud Liz..didn't mean to sound like I had all the answers. i am guessing just like you. I am doing too many things at once...sorryLiz said:Thanks JBean. I guess it's settled then.