GUILTY MI - 4 students killed, 6 injured, Oxford High School shooting, 30 Nov 2021 *Arrest incl parents* *teen guilty* #6

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #481
Shannon Smith and Mariell Lehman are no longer partners. Mariell now has her own practice in Macomb County.

Curious what Lehman thought of Smith's defense and her embarrassing,unprofessional antics, especially since Smith lost.

They had to separate their partnership when the Crumbley's dropped their united front if they both wanted to continue defending their client.
 
  • #482
re that long post with clips on this page and this question:


What about this scenario for Nov 30th?


C gets call from school
JC calls Bryan - do something stupid, gun in car ( detailed in the previous post)
What happens next?
Scenario: she checks her car in the lot before heading to OHS, gun isn't there. Next she tells James it’s not there. James replies that it will be at home and he'll check for it later .
Jennifer thinks - We can’t ask him now because if I search his bag and he has it, he’ll get suspended. It’s probably at home. Important to ' not get caught.' This is why they didn't check the back pack, but they just hoped it was at home despite realising it wasn't still in the car ( spare tyre box)


They attend OHS meeting. 12 mins. They leave at 11.16am..ish?
She goes back to work. James by phone logs onto door dashes so he doesn’t immediately go home and check if the gun is there.

12.51pm Police said Ethan opened fire inside Oxford High School
1:37 p.m. James returned home after learning of the active shooter situation at his son's school and dialled 911 ‘ 'I think my son took the gun,' Crumbley says
( around the same time, before either have been told the shooter is EC, she speaks with James.
She also texted Smith to say 'the gun is gone and so are the bullets' and other frantic texts followed, including: 'Omg Andy, he's going to kill himself. He must be the shooter.' )


Part of the 911 call, rest at the link
911 OPERATOR: 911 what is the location of your emergency?

JAMES CRUMBLEY: I am not really sure. I am at my house. There is an active shooter situation going on at the high school. My son goes to the high school. I have a missing gun at my house. I need an officer to come to my house right away please.

911 OPERATOR: OK, I am not going to be able to send anybody to your house right now, sir. They are on the active shooter situation right now.

JAMES CRUMBLEY: I understand that. There's a million cops there. I have a missing gun and my son is at the school. And we had to go meet with the counselor this morning because of something that he wrote on a test paper and then I was in town and I saw a whole bunch of cops going somewhere. And I made sure … I wanted to get to the high school to see if something was going on at the high school. And then somebody told me that there was an active shooter and then I raced home just to like find out and I think my son took the gun. I don’t know if it’s him. I don’t know what’s going on. I am really freaking out. My son’s name is Ethan Crumbley. C-R-U-M-B-L-E-Y.



'I saw a whole bunch of cops going somewhere. And I made sure .....'
made sure of what
Wow, just wow.
Curious if her work place has security cameras in the parking lot?
 
  • #483
IMO his parents had abandoned him for years (testimony of a neighbor). Traumatizing a child e.g. by neglect, rewires their brains permanently, so we can’t assume his violent tendencies existed independently of the way he was treated by them.

There was plenty enough in that household to create the conditions for either murder or suicide; you treat a child the way they did from a young age, at the very least, you’re going to get disordered thinking patterns, because normal human thinking patterns require certain parental (or parent-figure) interactions.

There is a lot of research current in this area. As an example that may not exactly be obvious, they have discovered that it’s not unusual for adopted children with behavior (issues), likely before they were adopted, to have poor internal rhythm. Treatment involves time on a trampoline, and having them bounce.
The lead scientist in this area is Van der Kolk.

Here’s a snippet of his work to summarize what I’m trying to say:

Traumatised people live in a world that's different from people who have not been traumatised. Their world looks different in every conceivable measure, whether it's brain or mind or body. It's a different planet.

Bessel van der Kolk


I believe this is the speech where van der Kolk talks about trampolines. Hearing him speak like this may be the best way to latch onto the kinds of things he talks about. His focus is how child abuse changes the brain, including how violence comes about. Very compelling talk IMO.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Hear! Hear! Fascinating read, and well worth the read. Thank you for posting it.
 
  • #484
My interview with Steve St. Juliana, father to one of the four killed in the Oxford High School massacre.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: IDK
  • #485
Maybe she was expert in dividing up the pizza in such a way that everyone was happy and felt heard about which topping they liked the best?

I’ve always wondered how the foreperson gets picked, too, since they can’t talk about trial until deliberations.
The JFP comes across as very confident. Maybe she volunteered when nobody else stepped up right away. I am not sure what to make of her speaking to the media so quickly. I also do not know what to make of her statement about Jennifer being the last person to have the gun so therefore she is guilty.
 
  • #486
Maybe she was expert in dividing up the pizza in such a way that everyone was happy and felt heard about which topping they liked the best?

I’ve always wondered how the foreperson gets picked, too, since they can’t talk about trial until deliberations.
LOL!
Yep, by 26 she had her pizza dividing skills down to a science.
 
Last edited:
  • #487

 
  • #488
re that long post with clips on this page and this question:


What about this scenario for Nov 30th?


C gets call from school
JC calls Bryan - do something stupid, gun in car ( detailed in the previous post)
What happens next?
Scenario: she checks her car in the lot before heading to OHS, gun isn't there. Next she tells James it’s not there. James replies that it will be at home and he'll check for it later .
Jennifer thinks - We can’t ask him now because if I search his bag and he has it, he’ll get suspended. It’s probably at home. Important to ' not get caught.' This is why they didn't check the back pack, but they just hoped it was at home despite realising it wasn't still in the car ( spare tyre box)


They attend OHS meeting. 12 mins. They leave at 11.16am..ish?
She goes back to work. James by phone logs onto door dashes so he doesn’t immediately go home and check if the gun is there.

12.51pm Police said Ethan opened fire inside Oxford High School
1:37 p.m. James returned home after learning of the active shooter situation at his son's school and dialled 911 ‘ 'I think my son took the gun,' Crumbley says
( around the same time, before either have been told the shooter is EC, she speaks with James.
She also texted Smith to say 'the gun is gone and so are the bullets' and other frantic texts followed, including: 'Omg Andy, he's going to kill himself. He must be the shooter.' )


Part of the 911 call, rest at the link
911 OPERATOR: 911 what is the location of your emergency?

JAMES CRUMBLEY: I am not really sure. I am at my house. There is an active shooter situation going on at the high school. My son goes to the high school. I have a missing gun at my house. I need an officer to come to my house right away please.

911 OPERATOR: OK, I am not going to be able to send anybody to your house right now, sir. They are on the active shooter situation right now.

JAMES CRUMBLEY: I understand that. There's a million cops there. I have a missing gun and my son is at the school. And we had to go meet with the counselor this morning because of something that he wrote on a test paper and then I was in town and I saw a whole bunch of cops going somewhere. And I made sure … I wanted to get to the high school to see if something was going on at the high school. And then somebody told me that there was an active shooter and then I raced home just to like find out and I think my son took the gun. I don’t know if it’s him. I don’t know what’s going on. I am really freaking out. My son’s name is Ethan Crumbley. C-R-U-M-B-L-E-Y.



'I saw a whole bunch of cops going somewhere. And I made sure .....'
made sure of what
I thought she didn't go back to work after the meeting at the school? Didn't she do her affair or go to horses?
 
  • #489
The JFP comes across as very confident. Maybe she volunteered when nobody else stepped up right away. I am not sure what to make of her speaking to the media so quickly. I also do not know what to make of her statement about Jennifer being the last person to have the gun so therefore she is guilty.
The evidence presented at trial concluded that it was JC who was last in possession of the gun.
JC testified saying that it was James who took the gun from the car into the house and hid it ( she didn't know where) had no evidence to back it up.
 
  • #490
"Could I be charged for all actions of my child?"
I dont know....

Did I ignore obvious warning flags that my child had violent inclinations?

Did I decline offered assistance to reduce (but not eliminate) threats posed by him?

Did I make fire arms directly available to him (wink, nod)?

Did I take him to a shooting range, thus ensuring that he not only had access to weapons, but that he also had first had familiarity with them?

If alot of those answers are "yes", then I am responsible for the actions of that particular child.

Ditto for if my child has violent inclinations and has an interest bombs. I then obtain illegal commercial strength fire works and tannerite (Aww shucks, purely for 4th of July fun- wink, nod). I place these things where he can easily get to them. He then builds a bomb and heads to the mall....
 
Last edited:
  • #491
I thought she didn't go back to work after the meeting at the school? Didn't she do her affair or go to horses?
No, she went back to work and when she got the news that there was a shooter at Oxford HS she was yelling as she flew out of the building she worked in.
1.5 mins after leaving the school parking lot after the meeting she texted Kari about her horse lesson later on and asked if the vet had come to see her horse's leg.
She did have plans to meet up with her Costco guy when she left the meeting.
 
  • #492
I dont know....

Did I ignore obvious warning flags that my child had violent inclinations?

Did I decline offered assistance to reduce (but not eliminate) threats posed by him?

Did I make fire arms directly available to him (wink, nod)?

Did I take him to a shooting range, thus ensuring that he not only had access to weapons, but that he also had first had familiarity with them?

If alot of those answers are "yes", then I am responsible for the actions of that particular child.

Ditto for if my child has violent inclinations and has an interest bombs. I then obtain illegal commercial strength fire works and tannerite (purely for 4th of July fun- wind, nod). I place these things where he can easily get to them. He then builds a bomb and heads to the mall....
Yup

It's a quote from Shannon Smith.
'I believe she used similar arguments in her closings too hence the uproar about her closing and whether it broke Michigan State Bar's professional code)
 
  • #493
I dont know....

Did I ignore obvious warning flags that my child had violent inclinations?

Did I decline offered assistance to reduce (but not eliminate) threats posed by him?

Did I make fire arms directly available to him (wink, nod)?

Did I take him to a shooting range, thus ensuring that he not only had access to weapons, but that he also had first had familiarity with them?

If alot of those answers are "yes", then I am responsible for the actions of that particular child.

Ditto for if my child has violent inclinations and has an interest bombs. I then obtain illegal commercial strength fire works and tannerite (purely for 4th of July fun- wind, nod). I place these things where he can easily get to them. He then builds a bomb and heads to the mall....
Good post.
Smith said your kitchen knives could get you criminally charged if your kid takes one and kills (injures?) someone.
A TV lawyer talking head was talking about a baseball bat being the weapon and the parent is charged.
The stupidity here is a kid doesn't have to be 18 or 21 to purchase or use with parental/adult restrictions a kitchen knife or a baseball bat.
 
  • #494
Foreperson went on the Today show! Wow. Her interview was interesting as far as how she answered the questions. Very short answers. Seemed like she wanted to be super careful and not ramble on. But she said for her the main issue was that Jennifer was the last person who had possession of the gun and, therefore, it was her responsibility to secure it. I’m really confused by this. She also said the Ethan’s diary was not a huge deal to her but it was to others. As for JC’s testimony - she realized during deliberations that JC is an unreliable witness and she was aghast that she said ‘she wouldn’t change anything.’ Curious what others thought?

JMO
I’m not surprised the diary was a huge deal to others. IMO, it’s some of the strongest evidence that EC wanted his parents to help him with his mental struggles and had told them as much. Yet they not only did nothing to help him, they also went out and bought him a gun!

I know JC claimed on the stand that EC never asked them for their help, but her testimony was unreliable quite frankly. Whereas, the private thoughts of a 14-year-old are usually the truth. A journal is the one place they can say the things they don’t feel comfortable saying to anyone else. What reason would he have to lie about asking them for help there?
 
  • #495
Does anyone think that the outcome might have been different if JC had not testified?
 
  • #496
The evidence presented at trial concluded that it was JC who was last in possession of the gun.
JC testified saying that it was James who took the gun from the car into the house and hid it ( she didn't know where) had no evidence to back it up.
We saw Jennifer with the gun at the gun range but we do not know where in the house or car the gun was when EC got his hands on it. It really doesn't matter if Jennifer brought the case into the house and put it away since it had the 0000 lock code. Both of the Crumbleys were aware of that.
When did EC take the gun? The night before? The morning of? Did he take it or because it was his did he have it in his room the whole time?
 
  • #497
Does anyone think that the outcome might have been different if JC had not testified?
SS defense attny had such an unpleasant and unprofessional co,urtroom behavior along with her disjointed and unfocused points made it impossible for me to believe her or feel any understanding of her and the defendant. IDK if it would have changed the outcome, but yours is a great question.
 
  • #498
Does anyone think that the outcome might have been different if JC had not testified?
I think her lawyer could have done a better job refuting the evidence. Smith was distracting which did not help. When JC took the stand I expected a woman who would be remorseful, show empathy, regret and love for her son. She came across as cold. She truly doesn't understand the error of her ways.
 
  • #499
Wow, just wow.
Curious if her work place has security cameras in the parking lot?
Even if it doesn't have cctv the timeline and the 911 transcript provide rich pickings for the prosecutor at James's trial next month.
His attys must be in a quandary, while they'd like him to get brownie points for both calling 911 and for ' racing home' the transcript is also inculpatory
 
  • #500
So, I'm having a re-look at a van der Kolk lecture. He's a famous neurobiologist. He studies disturbed children. He talks about how a brain gets re-wired in childhood as a result of neglect. I believe one of his examples will explain alot in Ethan's case.
But I also want to point out his observation that when he gives a lecture, the whole audience moves like a shoal of fish, bobbing and weaving as one. If someone is out of sync, it's the exception, and that calls for questioning. I loved this observation just for itself, but it also pointed me to JC as being a totally out of sync mother. As he underlines: the relationship (e.g. mother-child) isn't everything. It's the character of the relationship that is everything.

At around the 20 minute mark, van der Kolk talks about out of sync and a suicidal child.

Note: if you have CC English on, cross-match the text with the oral words, since a few times you could infer exactly the opposite of what van der Kolk is actually saying (he's Dutch).

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
121
Guests online
2,343
Total visitors
2,464

Forum statistics

Threads
632,816
Messages
18,632,161
Members
243,303
Latest member
ms.norway
Back
Top