dmc43613
Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Messages
- 465
- Reaction score
- 5
Welcome Mrsbk!
Welcome Mrsbk!
Bette - While I cannot say that anyone has discussed with me a connection (or a possible connection - besides here on the threads of course) I personally believe that it seems to be more than a coincidence that the two women are so closely connected. I wonder if Chelsea's body was hidden because things did not go "well" with the staging of Julia....
Bette - While I cannot say that anyone has discussed with me a connection (or a possible connection - besides here on the threads of course) I personally believe that it seems to be more than a coincidence that the two women are so closely connected. I wonder if Chelsea's body was hidden because things did not go "well" with the staging of Julia.
Also, the fact that Julia was partially clothed has always been hard for me to understand - IF you were staging her death to make it look as though she died naturally - or whatever they were going for - WHY leave her partially clothed? My thought here has always been that her death was an accident and that the person had the respect for her to not have her naked and exposed....Of course just my opinion.
If the step dad may have done this to protect himself from losing control over whatever he considered important enough to kill for, do you think he would have left evidence there to stage it to look like somebody else may have done it? I keep seeing in the media from these last couple years, well for lack of a better expression, LE's chain getting jerked often enough in the media about the evidence found at the scene, that has not been mentioned. Now this is a leap: it's as if the step dad knew of evidence at the scene that was staged to distance suspicion from him and that he's frustrated that LE won't release it. But how would he know? In this situation if he shows too much knowledge, then that implicates him. It's as if he knows the evidence exists somehow. I recall that LE would not let Julia's mom in the room, she made a point of sharing in an MSM broadcast interview, describing when she first heard and went to Julia's dorm, to door of her bedroom, but not inside.
Julia didn't live in a college dorm; she lived in an off-campus apartment. I've posted the link for Peninsular Place apartments here and on the media/information thread.
Safety information survey for Peninsular Place apartments. Let's hope the security cameras were operating the night that Julia died. Maybe the perp appeared in surveillance video.
http://www.emich.edu/offcampushousing/admin/pdf.php?id=62
No not publicly known evidence.
And evidence being something that would lead to an actual person and backs the homicide definition.
MIMOMMY,
Do I understand this correctly? Are you saying that there is some evidence of foul play that could be compared against a suspect (because it contains DNA evidence, or finger prints etc.)
If this is the case, then we can presume that they already compared it to JT. Given that he is not named a suspect, means that he did not match the evidence, and that he is not the killer.
Of course, he could have been involved in some other way, though.
Those are big suggestive leaps. Puts me in a spin. Would you care to share how you think such evidence exists?
There was no evidence of a struggle, IIRC. The whole cat in the dark thing.
I would wonder if they did have dna/prints, but JT refused to give prints/sample and again the childcharges were a strong arm arrest to get his "cooperation". ...brainstorming
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.