Michelle Young~Pregnant Mother NC Part 5

[jilly]

not trying to downplay the car being kept- but if its not a smoking gun,which must not be, or they would have arrested him, I dont know how much help it would be at a trial--- kinda like snott saying---yea guys bleed-:banghead: -- when his blood was found- and vice versa if a "trace" of hers was-

"yea guys bleed" - I remember that. Seems like the only time they bleed in or on the vehicle is when they've commit a murder - OJ comes to mind too. Anyways for Scott it ended up being one little piece to the circumstantial puzzle.

I agree if there was substantual blood & evidence in the vehicle, I think they would have arrested him by now.

 

[close_enough]

Is this the same car that they had the accident in? Or was that car totaled?

LOL, Remarks that SP made about men bleed.

hmmm, i don't remember ever reading what kind of vehicle went down the enbankment (sp?)...

 

[scandi]

Thanks Charlie. I hadn't heard that yet.

Gee I wonder if they got all their work done? Hopefully it will be the little piece of the puzzle they were looking for acc to Sheriff Harrison.

I was surprised they released the info about the tooth after the deafening silence in this case. Yesterday it was said they are under a lot of pressure by the public for info. I bet that's why they did it, as the tooth is probably a mute point.

They took down the tape on what day? Wed the 22nd? And then a few days later {CTV someone posted 3 days later} while cleaning the tooth was found. That would be Saturday, and it would make sense they would be cleaning on a Saturday, right?

They must have matched it through Michelle's dentist and know the origin of that tooth or they would never allow it to be stated in an article of the newspaper, right? That is why they know it is not a part of the case. Little Cassidy could have found it in the bathroom and while playing dropped it there months ago for all that matters.

Scandi

 

[raisincharlie]

Amanda specifically said it had not been released back to Jason. The footage showed it in some type of garage or storage area. The photographer made a point of getting a shot of the license plate - don't know why but she/he did.

I do hope the entire story will be aired again tonight on our 11 news and that it is uploaded to the website. I don't want anyone to think I'm making this up.

Oh and Charlie - Amanda reports for WRAL :blowkiss:

I don't think you are making it up by any means - I will definitely take your word for it. And thanks for telling me WRAL - the article was WTVD. Surprised I didn't mention my local tv station while I was at it !

 

[scandi]

Close, I read that her jaw was a bit swoolen but there were no abraisons or cuts on her face. If there were the mortician did a good job.

Maybe they said her lower face or neck. Can't remember exactly.
Scandi

 

[close_enough]

Thanks Charlie. I hadn't heard that yet.

Gee I wonder if they got all their work done? Hopefully it will be the little piece of the puzzle they were looking for acc to Sheriff Harrison.

I was surprised they released the info about the tooth after the deafening silence in this case. Yesterday it was said they are under a lot of pressure by the public for info. I bet that's why they did it, as the tooth is probably a mute point.

They took down the tape on what day? Wed the 22nd? And then a few days later {CTV someone posted 3 days later} while cleaning the tooth was found. That would be Saturday, and it would make sense they would be cleaning on a Saturday, right?

They must have matched it through Michelle's dentist and know the origin of that tooth or they would never allow it to be stated in an article of the newspaper, right? That is why they know it is not a part of the case. Little Cassidy could have found it in the bathroom and while playing dropped it there months ago for all that matters.

Scandi

the article stated that although LE hadn't done any 'testing' on the tooth, they think it was Michelle's....ooooh, i'll go grab a link...

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=local&id=4811361

 

[close_enough]

"yea guys bleed" - I remember that. Seems like the only time they bleed in or on the vehicle is when they've commit a murder - OJ comes to mind too. Anyways for Scott it ended up being one little piece to the circumstantial puzzle.

I agree if there was substantual blood & evidence in the vehicle, I think they would have arrested him by now.

lol, ain't that the truth

 

[scandi]

Yea, that makes sense Close. If they thought it was hers and took it to her dentist to confirm that, they wouldn't have to test it then. Looking at her film would confirm it.

Scandi

 

[close_enough]

Close, I read that her jaw was a bit swoolen but there were no abraisons or cuts on her face. If there were the mortician did a good job.

Maybe they said her lower face or neck. Can't remember exactly.
Scandi

wouldn't necessarily have to be any cut/abrasions on her face, even with a broken jaw....after my face hit the steering wheel, almost all of the blood came from inside of my mouth, from all the teeth knocked out...(well, 5 of them, along with chips of 2 others)....i had one place that was stitched up, in that tiny dent of your chin...it was small, but it bled also....anyway, my point is ....a person hitting Michelle in the face with their fists (which doesn't have the impact/power of a car wreck) could break her jaw & knock teeth out, without there being any outside cuts....(hope this is making sense...& i'm NOT drinking i promise!)

eta...good grief; i'm really not :crazy:

also...enough blunt force with a weapon of some kind could certainly do it also, from behind....

 

[Topsail Girl]

the article stated that although LE hadn't done any 'testing' on the tooth, they think it was Michelle's....ooooh, i'll go grab a link...

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=local&id=4811361

Testing.. could that be DNA testing if there were blood/matter attached to the tooth? Or possibly dental xrays to prove it was Michelle's. What gets me is how they can say they think it's Michelle's if they haven't done any testing. The only thing I can think of is if Jason had dentures. No - I'm joking. Seriously maybe it was a cap - or had a filling or they ruled it out as the daughter because it was too big. Who knows why :banghead:

 

[scandi]

You're so funny Close And Topsail, to ID a tooth they thought had to be Michelles maybe because of its size, all they would have to do is go to her dentist. He would have films on record to verify it.

Scandi

 

[close_enough]

You're so funny Close And Topsail, to ID a tooth they thought had to be Michelles maybe because of its size, all they would have to do is go to her dentist. He would have films on record to verify it.

Scandi

i have no idea Topsail, but i think LE has a reason for thinking it was hers...like possibly (i know i've already said it) because several of her teeth or pieces of her teeth were knocked out...maybe?

 

[Topsail Girl]

http://www.wral.com/news/10435063/detail.html


Click on this link and it will take you to the link with the video.

 

[close_enough]

http://www.wral.com/news/10435063/detail.html


Click on this link and it will take you to the link with the video.

thanks!!!....

ok, am i making too much of this??...this item would not have led to the identity of the perp who killed Michelle????

does anyone understand what i mean?

 

[raisincharlie]

I dont know that answer, but RC probably does- they did alot of work figuring out the cars to begin with-

that remark sp made has got to be one of the stupidist thing I have ever heard--- aaaaggggghhhhhhh !!!

j2mirish,

Thanks to Topsail Girl I think I now have an answer or something resembling one. In looking at the video link Topsail Girl posted a few posts above this, the vehicle shown is a Ford Suv - not the Mitsubishi. This leads me to "believe" the Mitsubishi was sufficiently damaged to warrant replacement. This also leads me to believe the personal property records we checked into may not be updated correctly but understanable. However I can tell you from a DMV check - the plate number shown is correct and would have been tranfered from the 2004 vehicle to the one shown.


Topsail - great job getting us the link ! Much appreciated.

 

[Topsail Girl]

j2mirish,

Thanks to Topsail Girl I think I now have an answer or something resembling one. In looking at the video link Topsail Girl posted a few posts above this, the vehicle shown is a Ford Suv - not the Mitsubishi. This leads me to "believe" the Mitsubishi was sufficiently damaged to warrant replacement. This also leads me to believe the personal property records we checked into may not be updated correctly but understanable. However I can tell you from a DMV check - the plate number shown is correct and would have been tranfered from the 2004 vehicle to the one shown.


Topsail - great job getting us the link ! Much appreciated.

WOW!! Great job - I hadn't even noticed the difference in the vehicles.

 

[Samiya]

Amanda specifically said it had not been released back to Jason. The footage showed it in some type of garage or storage area. The photographer made a point of getting a shot of the license plate - don't know why but she/he did.

I do hope the entire story will be aired again tonight on our 11 news and that it is uploaded to the website. I don't want anyone to think I'm making this up.

Oh and Charlie - Amanda reports for WRAL :blowkiss:

Maybe they got that shot of the licence place for the (sleuthpurpose) of seeing if someone rings in and says..........

Hey I recognise that car & number place I saw it at about 2am on the 3rd november, it was in Oohjarkafibbyuptheooziewhatzit St

 

[j2mirish]

j2mirish,

Thanks to Topsail Girl I think I now have an answer or something resembling one. In looking at the video link Topsail Girl posted a few posts above this, the vehicle shown is a Ford Suv - not the Mitsubishi. This leads me to "believe" the Mitsubishi was sufficiently damaged to warrant replacement. This also leads me to believe the personal property records we checked into may not be updated correctly but understanable. However I can tell you from a DMV check - the plate number shown is correct and would have been tranfered from the 2004 vehicle to the one shown.


Topsail - great job getting us the link ! Much appreciated.

I knew you would find the answer !

 

[close_enough]

j2mirish,

Thanks to Topsail Girl I think I now have an answer or something resembling one. In looking at the video link Topsail Girl posted a few posts above this, the vehicle shown is a Ford Suv - not the Mitsubishi. This leads me to "believe" the Mitsubishi was sufficiently damaged to warrant replacement. This also leads me to believe the personal property records we checked into may not be updated correctly but understanable. However I can tell you from a DMV check - the plate number shown is correct and would have been tranfered from the 2004 vehicle to the one shown.


Topsail - great job getting us the link ! Much appreciated.

good deal...now Packerdog has his/her answer....cool

 

[close_enough]

Maybe they got that shot of the licence place for the (sleuthpurpose) of seeing if someone rings in and says..........

Hey I recognise that car & number place I saw it at about 2am on the 3rd november, it was in Oohjarkafibbyuptheooziewhatzit St

yeah...cool how they showed it along w/the plate...ya never know!?