Missouri - The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #10

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #241
You are correct I can’t make you believe me, but everything I stated is 100% true and with this straight from the case file. However, dismissing what I have to say because it does not fit your box is not going to get this solved.

I came on here because I do want this solved. Having misinformation out there is not going to help solve this. I’m not trying to make Mike or Dusty seem better than they are, just telling the truth. If I believed for a sec either had anything to do with this I would of left a long time ago and would of gone to the police.


I have no agenda here, I am from the UK and was a toddler when this happened. You on the other hand are directly tied to this.

There is no misinformation the facts are your husband and friends had a motive. They was even questioned by the police due to fact they have a connection to the case.
 
  • #242
I have no agenda here, I am from the UK and was a toddler when this happened. You on the other hand are directly tied to this.

There is no misinformation the facts are your husband and friends had a motive. They was even questioned by the police due to fact they have a connection to the case.
And cleared. You forgot that part
 
  • #243
I have no agenda here, I am from the UK and was a toddler when this happened. You on the other hand are directly tied to this.

There is no misinformation the facts are your husband and friends had a motive. They was even questioned by the police due to fact they have a connection to the case.

And they have not been questioned again in the 23 yrs I’ve known him. Actually the only contact he has had with them is by him. You are right I am connected and that is how I have info I can give like the crime stoppers call, the statements (yes, there is an s), and the fact Joe made a plea deal to testify.
 
  • #244
Just to back up my opinion on why I don’t think this happened when Sherill was home alone.

Also was it more common in a city like this to drive vans over cars?

I am just thinking whoever did this would of had to have had a big enough vehicle to pull this off.
I'm just going to throw this out there. My dad had a lincoln town car when I was a kid, and we used to kid around about how large the trunk was and how many dead bodies you could put into it. Now, we were just kids, and it was clearly just us commenting on how dang big the car was, we also called it the boat. But thinking outside the box, there were a lot of older 70's model cars and 60's model cars around in the early 90's than you can shake ten sticks at. And what better way to trap and transport three people than to throw them into the trunk and shut it, hence locking them into the trunk. It wouldn't draw suspicion if someone saw the car, and it would be an easy way to contain them to get them to where you wanted to take them. Just something to consider. I have never been 100% comfortable that a van was even used, or that the porch lady's account was both accurate, truthful, or had any connection to the crime if it was truthful and accurate.
 
  • #245
Twist it however you like. Dusty is still one of the nicest people you’d ever meet. He just didn’t try and stop his friends from doing something stupid and has paid the price for it.
And we didn’t set out to rob the dead. We were walking thru the cemetery and I pointed out the window in the crypt was unbreakable plexiglass. Joe took it as a challenge, picked up a big rock and smashed it against the plexiglass until it fell into the crypt. Then he climbed in.
Do you care Mike to describe the mausoleum and who it belonged too ? And the band playing at the party you guys 'roadied' at and what their name was ? Would that be too much ?
 
  • #246
Do you care Mike to describe the mausoleum and who it belonged too ? And the band playing at the party you guys 'roadied' at and what their name was ? Would that be too much ?
Mike can correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the band Cyanide Rainbow?
 
  • #247
I just don’t see how this could be a crime of necessity or revenge. Also think that Sherrill was the target due to the fact she was supposed to be alone that night. If this was a big planned thing you would think they would look into what is going on and plan accordingly. They picked graduation night. Also don’t see Sherrill knowing anything that would warrant her death.
That's because you had never talked to Sherrill.
 
  • #248
Mike can correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the band Cyanide Rainbow?

They had a name change from Cyanide Rainbow to Mindaltar somewhere around that time frame but at that time I believe they were still called Cyanide Rainbow.
 
  • #249
They had a name change from Cyanide Rainbow to Mindaltar somewhere around that time frame but at that time I believe they were still called Cyanide Rainbow.
Well, they were using Cyanide Rainbow up into 1994, they were on a bill for Nathan P. Murphy's in June 1994.
 
  • #250
I love how spending a few seconds in the same room together equals “a brief period of time”. That’s quality spin right there.
Well it isn't any different than saying you didn't know someone when you did!
 
  • #251
That's because you had never talked to Sherrill.

As someone who claims to have talked with Sherrill, maybe you could tell us what Mary talked with Sherrill about on the phone shortly before she disappeared?

It might be deleted since you won’t get verified but I’m sure we’d all be interested in that information.
 
  • #252
  • #253
I love how spending a few seconds in the same room together equals “a brief period of time”. That’s quality spin right there.
Why are you being so defensive? No one is accusing you of being part of this crime. But rather trying to connect dots between Dustin and a man (Garrison) who was quite capable of either committing the crime, being involved in the commission of the crime, or being associated with who ever may have committed the crime. Nothing more. Respectfully!!
 
  • #254
Well, they were using Cyanide Rainbow up into 1994, they were on a bill for Nathan P. Murphy's in June 1994.
Thanks. I couldn’t remember when the name change happened so I figured I’d give both just in case.
 
  • #255
Who would that be?
I can't believe that I have to spell this out. Your wife said earlier today that you didn't even know Garrison. But you had previously claimed that Dustin and Garrison knew each other and had been over to your apartment briefly once. So no one was saying that you were best friends, or even friends, but rather that you had said Dustin knew Garrison and Garrison had been over to your apartment once briefly. You can know who someone is, with out being their friend. And if Dustin knew Garrison, as you have stated in the past, that's a pretty valuable piece of the puzzle in my opinion. Especially when you tie that in with the FACT that Garrison gave police information that was only known to police at the time, that a judge felt held enough probably cause to sign off on a search warrant on one or more properties. And, just because they didn't find the women, doesn't mean that they weren't on the property or properties they searched. We don't know what evidence they did or did not find. The search warrant return, remains sealed.
 
  • #256
Why are you being so defensive? No one is accusing you of being part of this crime. But rather trying to connect dots between Dustin and a man (Garrison) who was quite capable of either committing the crime, being involved in the commission of the crime, or being associated with who ever may have committed the crime. Nothing more. Respectfully!!

How in the world is that being defensive? You did spin it. You made it seem like they were friends when they barely knew each other.
 
  • #257
Since the cops' word is appreciated here so much, the primary investigator, leaned heavily on Garrison. So much that he was bonded out of jail and sent to a hotel to discuss this very case.

Got to ask WHY.....?
 
  • #258
Why are you being so defensive? No one is accusing you of being part of this crime. But rather trying to connect dots between Dustin and a man (Garrison) who was quite capable of either committing the crime, being involved in the commission of the crime, or being associated with who ever may have committed the crime. Nothing more. Respectfully!!

Because you put information that wasn’t accurate out there about a close friend of mine for people to take as fact. That tends to make me a little defensive.
 
  • #259
How in the world is that being defensive? You did spin it. You made it seem like they were friends when they barely knew each other.
Please its more than clear that he was expressing some level of defensiveness. But what ever. That's not the important part. You said they didn't know each other. But they did. How is that spinning anything. They may not have been friends, but that doesn't negate the fact that he knew Garrison, or knew who he was. It also doesn't negate the fact that he said that Dustin and Garrison were at the apartment at one time briefly. How is that spinning anything? It's not in any, way, shape nor form. Respectfully.
 
  • #260
Because you put information that wasn’t accurate out there about a close friend of mine for people to take as fact. That tends to make me a little defensive.
How am I not being accurate. Dustin knew Garrison. You stated that. How is that not being accurate or spinning anything???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
91
Guests online
1,745
Total visitors
1,836

Forum statistics

Threads
632,348
Messages
18,625,068
Members
243,098
Latest member
sbidbh
Back
Top