Missouri - The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #8

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #521
Sherrill's house was clean but it's a stretch to say where she may have had her broom and dust pan on a night when a lot of Suzie's friends and some family were expected by. She could have had it anywhere if there was some light sweeping done while finishing the dresser or Sherrill prepping for Stacy to come by (if Suzie was the 11:15pm call).

I find it extremely curious why multiple people said that Suzie was asking many other girls about coming over and staying the night. That leads me to believe Sherrill was having "that one guy" over. Or something was seriously wrong.

Who called at 11:15 pm? Who was in the house prior to June 7, 1992? And after April 1992.

It probably wasn't Cox. Or Garrison.

It can't hurt to go back over all 3 women's exes. It seems like that was how the case was looked at from the beginning though. I don't take much stock in what was said about Suzie that night, or how Stacy was just being a good friend.
 
  • #522
Sherrill's house was clean but it's a stretch to say where she may have had her broom and dust pan on a night when a lot of Suzie's friends and some family were expected by. She could have had it anywhere if there was some light sweeping done while finishing the dresser or Sherrill prepping for Stacy to come by (if Suzie was the 11:15pm call).

I find it extremely curious why multiple people said that Suzie was asking many other girls about coming over and staying the night. That leads me to believe Sherrill was having "that one guy" over. Or something was seriously wrong.

Who called at 11:15 pm? Who was in the house prior to June 7, 1992? And after April 1992.

It probably wasn't Cox. Or Garrison.

I have never read that Suzie asked multiple girls to stay over. Do you have a link for that so I can get some subtext.

If Sherrill was having company over why would that person of arrived so much later in the evening. Suzie would of already of been out of the house multiple hours by 11.15 for that second phone call.
 
  • #523
If Sherrill was refinishing a piece of furniture-Officer Bookout smelled varnish-why invite a man over? Staying somewhere else would make sense-and if Suzie thought her mom was having a man over why would she want to stay there?

Stacy's parents probably wouldn't have cared if the girls slept there. If your mom's BF was dangerous you wouldn't bring another girl into the house? You would sleep on a floor or in a car if it came to that. I got the impression that Sherrill was safety conscience. She might have dated a loser or two that doesn't mean she kept dating the same type of guys.
 
  • #524
Confirmation of at least one picture in frame missing
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2018-09-15-19-34-40_kindlephoto-4297601.png
    Screenshot_2018-09-15-19-34-40_kindlephoto-4297601.png
    605.2 KB · Views: 52
  • #525
I have never read that Suzie asked multiple girls to stay over. Do you have a link for that so I can get some subtext.

If Sherrill was having company over why would that person of arrived so much later in the evening. Suzie would of already of been out of the house multiple hours by 11.15 for that second phone call.
Let me find this for you later.

I believe it was in the Vanished video or the "Crime Watch Daily" Chris Hansen video.
 
  • #526
Confirmation of at least one picture in frame missing
Didn't Asher on 48 Hours also say that some of Suzie's modeling pictures were stolen?
 
  • #527
I thought he mentioned that the pictures were taken at different places.
 
  • #528
Confirmation of at least one picture in frame missing


It’s very intriguing that the cars could of been moved by the perps.

Has there ever been any confirmation that the cars were checked for finger prints as the cars definitely shouldn’t of been contaminated unlike the house.
 
  • #529
If photos were taken out of the frames that shows to me that the peep/perps were in no rush to vacate the house.

Even in 2018 putting photos in frames and out is a bi*ch and I find it a slow process.

Maybe my theory that whoever did this had a conversation with the woman in the living room has legs which I think could of happened due to to placing of the cigarettes.
 
  • #530
I am sure everything was dusted.

I don’t think anything out of place happened with the cars. They likely traveled down Glenstone. And looped back into the half circle. Nigel says Suzie never parked in the half circle so maybe someone was at the house causing them to bypass the regular driveway since they’re coming from Glenstone.

I doubt perps moved cars. They got them the hell out of there in a hurry I’m sure. No time to move things or order things around (proof because money wasn’t stolen).

I’m doubtful that someone was even there because of the women turning on tv and taking off makeup in the bathroom. There’s proof of that.

My guess is the perps came between 3:30-4:30am
 
  • #531
It’s possible it was just an empty frame.

No money stolen and broken globe makes me think a lot of things happened in or around the doorway...
 
  • #532
I am sure everything was dusted.

I don’t think anything out of place happened with the cars. They likely traveled down Glenstone. And looped back into the half circle. Nigel says Suzie never parked in the half circle so maybe someone was at the house causing them to bypass the regular driveway since they’re coming from Glenstone.

I doubt perps moved cars. They got them the hell out of there in a hurry I’m sure. No time to move things or order things around (proof because money wasn’t stolen).

I’m doubtful that someone was even there because of the women turning on tv and taking off makeup in the bathroom. There’s proof of that.

My guess is the perps came between 3:30-4:30am

Or thinks were staged.
 
  • #533
Or thinks were staged.
Then you're talking lots of planning. To execute a triple abduction, kill and dispose bodies, and come back and rearrange things.

That's more wild than any conspiracy angle!

Why leave nearly $500 in cash behind?
 
  • #534
I don't see conspiracy necessarily. But I see the investigation being bungled and bobbled pretty hard.

You may be right that they were all just incredibly dumb farmer boys. But, I don't think all of them were. And they were collectively responsible for the "red herrings" issue. They had let the TV crew come into their police department while lie detector tests were given. That sound like typical protocol to you? Even Moore was fuming pissed at that.

Being in denial of your own police force. Of your own community leaders. That's a big reason this is able to last 26+ years. They botched the investigation. Period.

They also didn't get to the house until the next day, I believe. They had no reason to suspect 3 women had been kidnapped that night. The Streeter/Levitt house had been so contaminated with people stopping in while no one actually reported them missing. They probably thought how can 3 women, one a mom disappear, and remain that way for? I think now it's time to re-question people, go over statements see what people say now.
 
  • #535
They also didn't get to the house until the next day, I believe. They had no reason to suspect 3 women had been kidnapped that night. The Streeter/Levitt house had been so contaminated with people stopping in while no one actually reported them missing. They probably thought how can 3 women, one a mom disappear, and remain that way for? I think now it's time to re-question people, go over statements see what people say now.
Another reason the cops are morons. Or being nefarious at least.

Stacy had her shorts at the house. McCall and police should have treated it as a crime scene the minute they knew that. Which was right when Janis got there basically.
 
Last edited:
  • #536
Then you're talking lots of planning. To execute a triple abduction, kill and dispose bodies, and come back and rearrange things.

That's more wild than any conspiracy angle!

Why leave nearly $500 in cash behind?

If you can explain how 3 women were taken from a house with no real evidence of a struggle, please do. And not the police officer angle. I'm not talking about planning I'm talking about something happening and it being covered up by multiple people. What is your actual theory?
 
  • #537
The washcloths don’t mean much. Suzie could’ve changed makeup before she went out for the night and she probably washed her face before the ceremony. The bathroom was so neat I can't believe there wasn’t a hamper. We don’t know how the purses looked since Janis disturbed them when she took and returned Stacy’s. That the 3 purses were in one area sounds like they were thrown or dropped.
 
  • #538
Another reason the cops are morons. Or being nefarious at least.

Stacy had her underwear at the house. McCall and police should have treated it as a crime scene the minute they knew that. Which was right when Janis got there basically.

Stacy was supposed to sleep over Janelle's she had a car and a purse. I wonder if she had spare clothes.
 
  • #539
If you can explain how 3 women were taken from a house with no real evidence of a struggle, please do. And not the police officer angle. I'm not talking about planning I'm talking about something happening and it being covered up by multiple people. What is your actual theory?
Why? I thought you didn't like dictating conversation...?
 
  • #540
Why? I thought you didn't like dictating conversation...?
I get that you like arguing. I just meant it not a cop or fake cop, how do you think these women were removed from the house?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
126
Guests online
3,645
Total visitors
3,771

Forum statistics

Threads
632,667
Messages
18,629,993
Members
243,241
Latest member
Kieiru
Back
Top