I think that there are at this point some jurors that are tuned out on this guy....I think judge watches the jury closely and bet he said get moving you are losing them.
This witness is good, but I’m not sure his testimony has been worth $25K (approximately what he’s been paid for his time/services). ETA: Rather, I don’t think the State needed him necessarily.
I think he said that is what he has been paid so far... could be more.This witness is good, but I’m not sure his testimony has been worth $25K (approximately what he’s been paid for his time/services). ETA: Rather, I don’t think the State needed him necessarily.
When we'd see PVC's on a monitor, the first thing we did was give oxygen.reviewed: Medical recs, interviews, all videos provided and autopsy report, additionally referred to Journal articles.
ETA Medical records reviewed were extensive, including previous Dr. and ER visits, labs, vitals, reported symptoms, EKG, cardiac telemetry monitor, etc.
EKG showed absolutely no abnormal heart rhythm. the telemetry monitor showed PVC (premature ventricular contraction). PVC is not uncommon and basically means the heart skips a beat occasionally.
I think that there are at this point some jurors that are tuned out on this guy....I think judge watches the jury closely and bet he said get moving you are losing them.
History of anxiety could explain his panic reaction while trying to put him in the squad car and his claustrophobia.After looking at his medical records:
High BP
anxiety
substance abuse
no diagnosis of heart disease previously, no signs of cardiac issues after looking at lab results, etc.
Unless I missed it, I don't think he is giving a time for this?
Only mentioning it since on the weekend it was being discussed on the sidebar thread about what, if any tests would have been done when he was hospitalized in March 2020.
History of anxiety could explain his panic reaction while trying to put him in the squad car and his claustrophobia.
Agree that this last witness is worth hearing. I just hope the defense doesn't put up as many expert witnesses as the prosecution did.WOW.
I was initially agreeing with others, that this witness wasn't necessary, but I do really think he just mentioned a few things that will really stick with the jury.
He explained, using the video footage and what GF's own words were ["thank you"], demonstrate that there was a lack of intention to harm law enforcement & that whatever was causing his initial reaction to being arrested, that conflict as the witness said, was now gone because he's seen thanking them taking him out of the police car. He then goes on to explain about the level of possible threat and harm to officers goes even lower when the person is in handcuffs. Then he said he saw no reason to put GF prone on the ground, that maneuver is used when trying to place someone in handcuffs, not after they're in handcuffs he said - referencing his experience as being a police officer AND now studying and teaching about policing and the regulation of policing.