- Joined
- Nov 9, 2015
- Messages
- 4,934
- Reaction score
- 44,873
Will the jurors be allowed to bring in any of the visual aids Nelson used in his closing? Like Exhibit 126? Did prosecution use any visual aids?
@ChaoStribHas anyone kept track of how long Nelson has been talking? Omg, I don’t think he’ll ever stop. I know he’s trying to do the best job he can for his client, but IMO he’d be more effective making succinct points.
Does someone have the list handy of the charges the jury is to consider?Why is Nelson discussing “intent.” Those aren’t in the charges, are they?
Doesn’t one of the charges including showing intent to kill? Or am I wrong?Why is Nelson discussing “intent.” The charges don’t include intent.
Agreed. Especially with the hypotheticals and baking cookies talk, jurors may be close to checking outOk...time to wrap it up. I think it's testing the jurors patience just as the pool reporter said this morning about the state. Attentive at first and interest waned toward the end. Nelson is there.
Thanks! That chart is the best layout of the charges I have seen, step by step.
No, they most certainly do not.Why is Nelson discussing “intent.” The charges don’t include intent, do they?
Yes, you can see that in the murder charges. JMO
Does someone have the list handy of the charges the jury is to consider?
Good point by Nelson. I never noticed that GF actually kicked his legs forcing himself out of the car. I now don't see it as him being dragged out the other side. Interesting.
Can’t the state object to something in his closing argument?