GUILTY MN - George Floyd, 46, died, Minneapolis, 25 May 2020 #18 - Chauvin Closing & Deliberations #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #341
Will the jurors be allowed to bring in any of the visual aids Nelson used in his closing? Like Exhibit 126? Did prosecution use any visual aids?
 
  • #342
Has anyone kept track of how long Nelson has been talking? Omg, I don’t think he’ll ever stop. I know he’s trying to do the best job he can for his client, but IMO he’d be more effective making succinct points.
 
  • #343
Why is Nelson discussing “intent.” The charges don’t include intent, do they?
 
  • #344
  • #345
Why is Nelson discussing “intent.” Those aren’t in the charges, are they?
Does someone have the list handy of the charges the jury is to consider?
 
  • #346
Ok...time to wrap it up. I think it's testing the jurors patience just as the pool reporter said this morning about the state. Attentive at first and interest waned toward the end. Nelson is there.
 
  • #347
Why is Nelson discussing “intent.” The charges don’t include intent.
Doesn’t one of the charges including showing intent to kill? Or am I wrong?
 
  • #348
Ok...time to wrap it up. I think it's testing the jurors patience just as the pool reporter said this morning about the state. Attentive at first and interest waned toward the end. Nelson is there.
Agreed. Especially with the hypotheticals and baking cookies talk, jurors may be close to checking out
 
  • #349
  • #350
that is what is so outrageous and scary Mr. Nelson, your client did this while being videotaped by his job and by the public. The expression at some points on your client's face is not that of a reasonable concerned public servant. It is that of a man trying to prove to his audience (the crowd) who is boss.
 
  • #351
We need to remember that the Defense gets once chance at closing statements. Not only is he trying to counter what the prosecution has already said.. but will say in rebuttal.

Closing arguments have been longer than I expected though.. for both sides.

JMO
 
  • #352
  • #353
Why is Nelson discussing “intent.” The charges don’t include intent, do they?
No, they most certainly do not.
Gaslighting bigly is what he's at, it disrespects the victim, the courts and the jury IMO.
It's also complete BS!
 
  • #354
Am I missing something here...Nelson is making the case for "lack of intent" but that is not a requirement for any of the charges...correct?
 
  • #355
  • #356
Does someone have the list handy of the charges the jury is to consider?

OK. I see that the “intention” applies to the use of force. That’s different from intent to kill.
 
  • #357
Good point by Nelson. I never noticed that GF actually kicked his legs forcing himself out of the car. I now don't see it as him being dragged out the other side. Interesting.

Hope that jurors see as all of here do.

That has NOTHING to do with charges. (Interesting for WS.. but not for trial MOO)
 
  • #358
What’s tragic is what his client did by putting his knee on his neck
 
  • #359
Can’t the state object to something in his closing argument?
 
  • #360
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
2,525
Total visitors
2,665

Forum statistics

Threads
633,196
Messages
18,637,822
Members
243,443
Latest member
PhillyKid91
Back
Top