- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 30,018
- Reaction score
- 208,376
The chart posted upthread just a short while go lays this out (though that particular charge is more confusing that the others, imo).I don't understand your post.
jmo
The chart posted upthread just a short while go lays this out (though that particular charge is more confusing that the others, imo).I don't understand your post.
I couldn’t agree more. It’s really interesting to see his expressions without the mask. It’s almost (almost) a defiant type look.Chauvin should have left his mask on. His face is too smug for the moment. Much like the knee on the neck posture. MOO
This crowd issue really hits a nerve with me. The crowd was upset because DC was not offering basic medical aid to a dying man. It's not like they were protesting something unrelated and were attacking the cops out of anger. They were upset and yelling because he was not helping GF and instead kneeling on him after he was unresponsive.Backing up a bit, I was struck by the detail Nelson presented about how much attention Chauvin had to pay to the condition of the crowd in order to assess what might happen....but never (or only briefly) mentioned paying attention to Mr Floyd’s condition and what might happen.
JMO
I will never forget the look on Chauvins face when pulled out that taser. It was terrifying. To me. My internet keeps cutting out Grrrr.....
Which charge? You didn't mention it.The chart posted upthread just a short while go lays this out (though that particular charge is more confusing that the others, imo).
jmo
That’s the way I’m reading it. Though none require the intent to commit murder, those two require some element of intent. JMO3rd degree - the death of GF by an intentional act...
2nd degree while commiting a felony... intentionally applied unlawful force .... (part of the assault in 3rd degree)
So, both require intent to find guilty?
that is from the State's graphic:
View attachment 293388
This may have been answered already, but if not, 2nd degree murder charge the intent in question is: did DC intentionally apply unlawful force.Am I missing something here...Nelson is making the case for "lack of intent" but that is not a requirement for any of the charges...correct?
To inflict pain.Why is Chauvin squeezing his fingers like that?????
SO... if these are the charges given to the jury, it seems like a conviction on the manslaughter is a no- brainer. I do not think a conviction on the 2nd degree murder charge is likely. It’s a possibility on the 3rd degree charge.... unless there’s that “ one juror”. Or two. JMO
Here we go again...instructions...that even trial watchers are totally confused by. I thought I understood them and now I am confused. This is why we have hung juries. Getting very nervous.That’s the way I’m reading it. Though none require the intent to commit murder, those two require some element of intent. JMO
I agree. I thought I understood them relatively well going into today. I’m not so sure either. Maybe seeing the written instructions will help. Hopefully.Here we go again...instructions...that even trial watchers are totally confused by. I thought I understood them and now I am confused. This is why we have hung juries. Getting very nervous.