MN - Journalist Don Lemon arrested for church protest, Minneapolis, 18 Jan 2026

[Izzylizzy]

However, ethical considerations may encourage them to report such information to prevent harm. He not only didn't report it but went not knowing where this would take the protest, he himself is on video obstruction the church goers from leaving the church. Children were not allowed to get with their parents, were terrified, crying. Don Lemon was charged with federal civil rights crimes related to his involvement in an anti-ICE protest at a church in Minnesota. He faces charges of conspiracy and interfering with the First Amendment rights of worshippers during the protest.

DL is on video preventing church goers from leaving?
Video please.
If one wants to bring "ethics" into the conversation then it should begin with who and what prompted the protest to begin with.
imo

 

[shotgun09]

Regarding the requests for video proof of DL's preventing ( obstructing), we collectively here, have only seen a few snaps of inside the church. One, from DL himself, and another from Kelly ( another arrestee). There is, according to the FBI affidavit , additional footage from the church, (who was live videoing the service ), as well as private church members who had pulled out their phones to record. We do not have access to those, but the court will. The claims may have come from those?

 

[Cryptic]

Can you please show any video where Don Lemon is obstructing or preventing the church parishioners from leaving the church? Do you think asking them questions as a reporter is obstructing?

If Don remained in the Church after being told to leave, he was obstructing them. My bet is that he is going to get squeezed into a cell some where.

 

[Summerliz03]

Regarding the requests for video proof of DL's preventing ( obstructing), we collectively here, have only seen a few snaps of inside the church. One, from DL himself, and another from Kelly ( another arrestee). There is, according to the FBI affidavit , additional footage from the church, (who was live videoing the service ), as well as private church members who had pulled out their phones to record. We do not have access to those, but the court will. The claims may have come from those?

I guess we will have to see what other video evidence there is as more actual information comes out and the indictment moves forward.

 

[Izzylizzy]

Regarding the requests for video proof of DL's preventing ( obstructing), we collectively here, have only seen a few snaps of inside the church. One, from DL himself, and another from Kelly ( another arrestee). There is, according to the FBI affidavit , additional footage from the church, (who was live videoing the service ), as well as private church members who had pulled out their phones to record. We do not have access to those, but the court will. The claims may have come from those?

I think the "obstruction" charge is for obstructing the church service.
imo

 

[LAborn]

Regarding the requests for video proof of DL's preventing ( obstructing), we collectively here, have only seen a few snaps of inside the church. One, from DL himself, and another from Kelly ( another arrestee). There is, according to the FBI affidavit , additional footage from the church, (who was live videoing the service ), as well as private church members who had pulled out their phones to record. We do not have access to those, but the court will. The claims may have come from those?

Until there is video evidence, sworn testimony, etc. we should stick with what facts are known imo.

 

[Ontario Mom]

Regarding the requests for video proof of DL's preventing ( obstructing), we collectively here, have only seen a few snaps of inside the church. One, from DL himself, and another from Kelly ( another arrestee). There is, according to the FBI affidavit , additional footage from the church, (who was live videoing the service ), as well as private church members who had pulled out their phones to record. We do not have access to those, but the court will. The claims may have come from those?

My impression is there was a considerable amount of video as well as first hand testimony. The details of who did what and how, are pretty detailed in the indictment (located here: Read the DOJ indictment of Don Lemon and other journalists, activists)

 

[BayouBelle_LA]

Can you please show any video where Don Lemon is obstructing or preventing the church parishioners from leaving the church? Do you think asking them questions as a reporter is obstructing? Did he cause physical or emotional harm to them by asking questions? Did he prevent them from ending the interviews and walking away or saying no comment? Can you please show video of him doing any of those things?

Don Lemon was trespassing. He was asked to leave and he didn’t, he continued to take up his cause.

The way that he joyfully talked about the “young man” crying was disgusting. That was a child. He wasn’t there as a neutral journalist, he chose a side.

imo

 

[Sundog]

Don Lemon stated today at the Grammy Awards that the first time people will hear from him about this matter (other than on his own show) is on Jimmy Kimmel's show on Monday night.

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7602080902881004831

Guess he's got an "exclusive."

 

[Summerliz03]

Don Lemon was trespassing. He was asked to leave and he didn’t, he continued to take up his cause.

The way that he joyfully talked about the “young man” crying was disgusting. That was a child. He wasn’t there as a neutral journalist, he chose a side.

imo

And trespassing on a private church ground is not part of the federal criminal charges against him, as the federal government cannot charge him with that. The church is welcome to press charges against him for trespassing but the federal government can’t, as it wasn’t their property that he was trespassing on.

 

[Leilei]

However, ethical considerations may encourage them to report such information to prevent harm. He not only didn't report it but went not knowing where this would take the protest, he himself is on video obstruction the church goers from leaving the church. Children were not allowed to get with their parents, were terrified, crying. Don Lemon was charged with federal civil rights crimes related to his involvement in an anti-ICE protest at a church in Minnesota. He faces charges of conspiracy and interfering with the First Amendment rights of worshippers during the protest.

Is there a link to DL preventing churchgoers from leaving the church? I would like to see that clip if you could provide it, please.
TYIA and IMO.

 

[Sundog]

BBM

Don Lemon is not a "former journalist."

Agree, I should have said "former credentialed journalist" as he is now an independent journalist.

 

[Leilei]

Don Lemon was trespassing. He was asked to leave and he didn’t, he continued to take up his cause.

The way that he joyfully talked about the “young man” crying was disgusting. That was a child. He wasn’t there as a neutral journalist, he chose a side.

imo

BBM - what cause is that?
I saw him reporting and interviewing. Being a journalist.
Which is his job.
IMO.

 

[keek]

Agree, I should have said "former credentialed journalist" as he is now an independent journalist.

"Fake News"

 

[Leilei]

Guess he's got an "exclusive."

I mean, he was THERE, reporting on it.
He was arrested.
So yes, one could call that an "exclusive".
IMO.

 

[Summerliz03]

Agree, I should have said "former credentialed journalist" as he is now an independent journalist.

You don’t lose your press credentials if you leave a network and work independently.

Edit: his credentials would change when he started working as an independent journalist, but he still has credentials.

 

[nhmemorymaker]

How is this news about Don Lemon? Also it was not a "riot". I'm sure her use of language was very deliberate and very coded--dog whistlie. Unreliable source, btw. JMO

You don’t lose your press credentials if you leave a network and work independently.

Edit: his credentials would change when he started working as an independent journalist, but he still has credentials.

of course he does....

 

[otto]

Can you please show any video where Don Lemon is obstructing or preventing the church parishioners from leaving the church? Do you think asking them questions as a reporter is obstructing? Did he cause physical or emotional harm to them by asking questions? Did he prevent them from ending the interviews and walking away or saying no comment? Can you please show video of him doing any of those things?

Is video required, or is the affidavit sworn by church victims sufficient?

According to legal documents, defendants - including Don Lemon - interfered with families who tried to gather their children, leave the church, and leave the area.

Who is indicted based on victim affidavits:

Don Lemon indictment

www.documentcloud.org

What did they state in the affidavit:

p.17-18

FBI affidavit in suport of arrest warrant | PDF | U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement | American Government

This affidavit, submitted by Special Agent Timothy Gerber, outlines the investigation into a group of agitators who disrupted a religious service at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN on January 18, 2026. The group, led by Nekima Valdez Levy-Armstrong and Chauntyll Louisa Allen, coordinated their...

www.scribd.com

More evidence can be found in the affidavit. The above is a small sample.

 

[LAborn]

I think the "obstruction" charge is for obstructing the church service.
imo

How can they charge obstruction for reporting/recording the protest? Is DOJ saying he was PART of the protest? Cuz, that ain't so. From the stream I saw, he was off to the side, out of the way of the protesters and parishioners, not near them.

 

[Sundog]

Pretty good article outlining 1st amendment protection on public vs. private spaces. Unless DL had prior authorization from the church, this could be an issue for him. My impression is sharing recordings without proper consent could be problematic because it's a private space and people expect a degree of privacy, unlike public spaces. Why First Amendment Protections Are Limited in the Don Lemon Arrest — EEW Magazine

Good article and helpful in breaking down the key legal components.

And from the article:

Trespass:
Entering or remaining on private property without permission. Journalistic purpose does not negate trespass laws.

Why This Matters

Cases involving journalism, protest, and religious liberty often involve overlapping constitutional interests. Understanding where First Amendment protections end and where property rights and federal statutes apply is essential to informed public discussion.

Courts are tasked with weighing facts and law, not public opinion. The outcome in this case will depend on evidence, statutory interpretation, and judicial review.