MN - Journalist Don Lemon arrested for church protest, Minneapolis, 18 Jan 2026

  • #721
A journalist can be an agitator. imo

How many protesters did Lemon interview while inside the church? Did he ever once question the behavior of the protesters?
That's a significant observation. And telling, imo.
 
  • #722
Thanks for the objective analysis.

As to your question, one detractor might be that Lemon filmed himself with the group preparing for the "secret mission", then he followed the protesters directly to the Church.

This could show more involvement towards participating than a fact pattern of: I got an anonymous tip that something news worthy might occur at this church. I then sat outside and waited. I had no previous contact with the protesters.
If it was a "secret mission" why were flyers posted around town advertising it?
 
  • #723
Well? Is there any evidence Lemon infringed on amendment rights?

MOO 🐄
He filmed himself doing it.

He literally livestreamed himself in a church, during their regularly schedule time of worship, actively participating in interrupting the service. He wasn't participating in the worship, he was walking around, talking and filming and quite audibly making commentary on what was going on.

Both the affidavit and the indictment spell it all out.
So yes, there is evidence. Lemon made sure of it by recording and publishing on his YT channel.
 
Last edited:
  • #724
Do you have any input on whether places of worship are like private homes, back yards etc and are inherently private?

If churches etc. are innately private trespass may well still occur even with out being told to leave or having posted "Keep out" signs.

But if places of worship are like stores or wooded lots in regards to innate privacy, then signs or the need to be told to leave comes into play.

What is your opinion? Very interested in it.
Churches are "private property" in that they are privately held. They are not "open to the public" in that they must serve all that come in. Their doors are open to those to worship. So in some ways it is like your home. But the trespass question, to me, is a red-herring. Yes, they trespassed. they were asked to leave and did not. But the federal charges are in regards to the FACE Act, not trespass.
Did the police ever respond to this church?
 
  • #725
Do we know when the police arrived? Are they charged with trespassing?
They were dispatched at 10:40 a.m. I'm still zooming in and reading.

Page 14, starts at the bottom.

 
  • #726
Churches are private property because they are not owned by the govenment, but members of the public walk into churches worldwide, every single day. AFAIK, the Cities Church does not have a "No Trespassing" or "Private Property" sign (although we know churches ARE privately owned). A church is not normally closed to members of the public, of which the group, including Lemon, were members of the public.

IMO, as far as trespassing, if there was no signage and the door was open to members of the public, it then becomes trespassing only when/if they are asked to leave and do not do so. Someone would have to determine a legally required length of time in which they were required to leave before it constitutes trespassing.

IMO
Churches are by definition private property. Don Lemon was asked to leave. Lemon's response was to ask whether the pastor did not want him to worship.

Lemon did not leave as requested, and remained in the church for another 13 minutes. Was Lemon prevented from leaving? That has not been reported.

"The First Amendment ... does not provide journalists with a general right to access private property without permission.

Churches and houses of worship are private property. Entry without consent, particularly during an active religious service, may constitute trespass regardless of journalistic intent or purpose. Newsgathering does not override property rights, and journalists are subject to the same access limitations as the general public.
...

Trespass: Entering or remaining on private property without permission. Journalistic purpose does not negate trespass laws.

Cases involving journalism often involve overlapping constitutional interests."


1770068274102.webp


 
  • #727
So far, 4 judges have indicated that they saw no probable cause.
<snipped for focus>

I thought that one of the judges on the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals stated that:

the Complaint and Affidavit clearly establish probable cause for all five arrest warrants
 
  • #728
Churches are "private property" in that they are privately held. They are not "open to the public" in that they must serve all that come in. Their doors are open to those to worship. So in some ways it is like your home. But the trespass question, to me, is a red-herring. Yes, they trespassed. they were asked to leave and did not. But the federal charges are in regards to the FACE Act, not trespass.
Did the police ever respond to this church?
They did, and were dispatched at 10:40am after multiple calls from the churchgoers themselves.
Pg. 15 of the affidavit: FBI affidavit in suport of arrest warrant | PDF | U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement | American Government
 
  • #729
If it was a "secret mission" why were flyers posted around town advertising it?
The secret target was not given.

ETA. I said that all garbled.
 
  • #730
According to the FBI after david ( hehe) I mean affidavit, the police were dispatched at 10:40 am after receiving multiple phone calls from church members. Per Officer Jonathan Schroeder SPPD, the statement states "parishioners reported 20-40 individuals were disrupting their worship services by chanting and protesting"
 
  • #731
Here’s an interview with Nekima Armstrong regarding Don Lemon’s involvement. She mentions that Don saw a flyer posted with basic details about the event and he reached out to her to ask questions about the protest.

Edit: I highly recommend everyone spend the 5 minutes to watch the video of her interview about the event. It’s very informative and gives a lot of details about how everything happened and how the DOJ is handling this case.


Well, that answers that then! Neither DL or GF had any prior knowledge and didnt know where they were going or what was going to happen before they got to the location!.
 
  • #732
They were dispatched at 10:40 a.m. I'm still zooming in and reading.

Page 14, starts at the bottom.


It's really hard to read this affidavit. People thought there was going to be a mass shooting. Children said to their parents after the service "Daddy, I thought we were going to die."

Shameful, evil.
 
  • #733
<snipped for focus>

I thought that one of the judges on the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals stated that:

the Complaint and Affidavit clearly establish probable cause for all five arrest warrants

Yes, on reading further, one appeals judge agreed. But was in the minority.

So, three out of 4 judges declined to sign arrest warrants.

Here's the link.

 
  • #734
Churches are by definition private property. Don Lemon was asked to leave. Lemon's response was to ask whether the pastor did not want him to worship.

Lemon did not leave as requested, and remained in the church for another 13 minutes. Was Lemon prevented from leaving? That has not been reported.

"The First Amendment ... does not provide journalists with a general right to access private property without permission.

Churches and houses of worship are private property. Entry without consent, particularly during an active religious service, may constitute trespass regardless of journalistic intent or purpose. Newsgathering does not override property rights, and journalists are subject to the same access limitations as the general public.
...

Trespass: Entering or remaining on private property without permission. Journalistic purpose does not negate trespass laws.

Cases involving journalism often involve overlapping constitutional interests."


View attachment 641287

I find it strange that he says “You don’t want us to worship”. He included himself by using the word “us”. What a strange thing to ask since they disrupted the worship service. imo
 
Last edited:
  • #735
Well, that answers that then! Neither DL or GF had any prior knowledge and didnt know where they were going or what was going to happen before they got to the location!.
I think it is likely that everyone knew where they were going when they met in the parking lot of Cub Foods. They had to know where they were driving to and where they were going. That is knowledge in advance.
 
  • #736
Well, that answers that then! Neither DL or GF had any prior knowledge and didnt know where they were going or what was going to happen before they got to the location!.
DL knew in the pre event interview with the organizer that the intent was to disrupt. He then went with them to a church. You can't tell me he didn't know he was entering a church service.
 
  • #737
  • #738
  • #739
I think it is likely that everyone knew where they were going when they met in the parking lot of Cub Foods. They had to know where they were driving to and where they were going. That is knowledge in advance.

She literally just said they didn't know!
I can only guess that they were told to follow the lead car to the final destination.

ETA @SouthAussie has kindly provided a link showing that they were driven there by someone else.
 
  • #740
I find it strange that he says “You don’t want us to worship. He included himself by using the word “us”. What a strange thing to ask since they disrupted the worship service. imo
Especially since he was there all by his lonesome. JMO
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
259
Guests online
1,499
Total visitors
1,758

Forum statistics

Threads
639,371
Messages
18,741,815
Members
244,651
Latest member
NoelyG
Back
Top