Makes me wonder just how the actual victims in the church felt regarding Don Lemon.
Did they view, perceive or feel threatened by his actions that day? Were his actions perceived as behaving as a journalist or an activist? Or both? Or, does that matter?
My personal opinion is DL wore two hats that day. The journalist hat was underneath the activist hat. ( Also under a borrowed knitted hat and a hood for some time) And during the disruption, right in the middle of it, DL switched the placement of his hats, and put the journalist hat on the top. His actions, IMO were clearly deceptive and only added fuel to the proverbial fire. As in.. " SURPRISE !!! It's Don Lemon interviewing YOU , you church goers! Right inside your now interrupted church service! Live!!! "
Can you imagine the shock as a praying church congregation comes to realize not only are we interrupted by a loud frightening and intimidating protest, but now, after removing the hood and cap.. "Is that Don Lemon?" ( Wearing his journalist hat on the top ) " Why is HE here?"
Kids were crying in fear, parents were stunned into protection mode, half the congregants fled to the doors to escape the mayhem, and here comes Don Lemon !!?? Really, dude? You thought this was a good idea for a story, "LIVE" ????
Did Don Lemon know and expect chaos and disruption Inside an ACTIVE Church Service would cause fear and terror? I think he did.
I believe he said "that is the purpose". And, I believe he wanted to be a part of it, regardless of which hat he was wearing.
MOO and Peace