MN - Journalist Don Lemon arrested for church protest, Minneapolis, 18 Jan 2026

  • #1,581
Rrrright. But no, actually wrong. The grand jury does not determine guilt. The grand jury determines if there is enough of probable cause to press charges.



Please provide a link to this claim of his.

MOO šŸ„
When he said he was "doing journalism."

MOO.
 
  • #1,582
  • #1,583
Ah, si that's just your creative interpretation of Lemon's statement. Get it.
No, because he can say that he is "doing protests" and that would not give him any claim of immunity.

MOO.
 
  • #1,584
that video is certainly going to be an exhibit in the US case against the defendants. Pretty damning stuff.
I couldn't possibly agree more with Pastor Parnell. Utterly shameful conduct by every single one of them.
I sincerely hope everyone charged, and anyone that may still yet be charged, is found guilty and goes directly to jail.
This cannot be tolerated in a civilized society. Not in a Christian church, a Mosque, Synagogue or any other protected place of worship.

jmo
 
  • #1,585
Facing charges over his presence at a church protest challenging the immigration crackdown in Minnesota, Mr. Lemon has hired as one of his defense lawyers a veteran criminal litigator who, until just weeks ago, was helping lead the prosecutor’s office that has charged Mr. Lemon with felonies.

Joseph H. Thompson, a former senior federal prosecutor who resigned from the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota in mid-January over the Justice Department’s handling of the immigration operation, has joined Mr. Lemon’s defense team, according to a court filing.

Mr. Thompson’s appointment is the latest plot twist in a high-profile case that has been anomalous from the start. By representing the most prominent of nine defendants charged in the church protest case, Mr. Thompson will face off against a department that employed him for nearly 17 years. Mr. Thompson will work alongside Mr. Lemon’s lead defense lawyer, Abbe Lowell.


 
  • #1,586
Facing charges over his presence at a church protest challenging the immigration crackdown in Minnesota, Mr. Lemon has hired as one of his defense lawyers a veteran criminal litigator who, until just weeks ago, was helping lead the prosecutor’s office that has charged Mr. Lemon with felonies.

Joseph H. Thompson, a former senior federal prosecutor who resigned from the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota in mid-January over the Justice Department’s handling of the immigration operation, has joined Mr. Lemon’s defense team, according to a court filing.

Mr. Thompson’s appointment is the latest plot twist in a high-profile case that has been anomalous from the start. By representing the most prominent of nine defendants charged in the church protest case, Mr. Thompson will face off against a department that employed him for nearly 17 years. Mr. Thompson will work alongside Mr. Lemon’s lead defense lawyer, Abbe Lowell.


That could be a conflict of interest, if he was still in the office when the incident occurred.

MOO
 
  • #1,587
that video is certainly going to be an exhibit in the US case against the defendants. Pretty damning stuff.
I couldn't possibly agree more with Pastor Parnell. Utterly shameful conduct by every single one of them.
I sincerely hope everyone charged, and anyone that may still yet be charged, is found guilty and goes directly to jail.
This cannot be tolerated in a civilized society. Not in a Christian church, a Mosque, Synagogue or any other protected place of worship.

Well shameful conduct that most of us don't approve of isn't necessarily illegal. I haven't watched every minute but I still haven't seen where any of them use force or physical obstruction, unless obstruction counts for when they were standing up front during the service. They were certainly loud at times, and so certainly could be considered "intimidating" at times, and maybe that's enough to qualify as violating the FACE Act. We shall see. in any case, they might still be subject to a civil claim.

FACE Act excerpt: "by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person"
 
Last edited:
  • #1,588
That could be a conflict of interest, if he was still in the office when the incident occurred.

MOO

He wasn't. He resigned on January 13th after the killing of Renee Good.
The church protest happened on January 18th.

a.webp


 
  • #1,589
He wasn't. He resigned on January 13th after the killing of Renee Good.
The church protest happened on January 18th.

View attachment 643534


When did the Lemon incident occur and when was his resignation effective?
 
  • #1,590
Facing charges over his presence at a church protest challenging the immigration crackdown in Minnesota, Mr. Lemon has hired as one of his defense lawyers a veteran criminal litigator who, until just weeks ago, was helping lead the prosecutor’s office that has charged Mr. Lemon with felonies.

Joseph H. Thompson, a former senior federal prosecutor who resigned from the U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota in mid-January over the Justice Department’s handling of the immigration operation, has joined Mr. Lemon’s defense team, according to a court filing.

Mr. Thompson’s appointment is the latest plot twist in a high-profile case that has been anomalous from the start. By representing the most prominent of nine defendants charged in the church protest case, Mr. Thompson will face off against a department that employed him for nearly 17 years. Mr. Thompson will work alongside Mr. Lemon’s lead defense lawyer, Abbe Lowell.



So we can count that as another expert attorney who favors Lemon's position.
 
  • #1,591
dbm
 
  • #1,592
Please explain how this is a conflict.
Because he would know about the internal discussions regarding the case. If he resigned before the incident and wasn't there for the discussions, it would be okay.

MOO
 
  • #1,593
When did the Lemon incident occur and when was his resignation effective?

Obviously the Don Lemon incident happened after the killing of Renee, as the protesters were chanting about her killing in the church on January 18th. It seems to have been the inspiration for their protest, and their outing of the pastor/director of ICE field operations.

Five other federal prosecutors resigned at the same time as Joseph Thompson. January 13th. When a person resigns due to disagreeing with their employer, it is usual for them to leave right away. Their employer doesn't want a disagreeing person to continue to work in their midst.

 
  • #1,594
Obviously the Don Lemon incident happened after the killing of Renee, as the protesters were chanting about her killing in the church. It seems to have been the inspiration for their protest, and their outing of the pastor/director of ICE field operations.

Six federal prosecutors resigned at the same time as Joseph Thompson. January 13th. When a person resigns due to disagreeing with their employer, it is usual for them to leave right away. Their employer doesn't want a disagreeing person to continue to work in their midst.

The killing was on the 1/7. Thompson resigned a week later, but when was it effective?

Normally it is two weeks. IMO.
 
  • #1,595
The killing was on the 1/7. Thompson resigned a week later, but when was it effective?

Normally it is two weeks. IMO.

They may be paid for two weeks after, but their resignation is effective immediately.
The employer doesn't want a disagreeing worker in their midst. Pay them out, let them go.
 
  • #1,596
They may be paid for two weeks after, but their resignation is effective immediately.
The employer doesn't want a disagreeing worker in their midst. Pay them out, let them go.
It may be and it may no be. That is why I'm asking the question.

He many have not been there, but 5-6 days is not a big gap.

MOO.
 
  • #1,597
I think it's safe to assume the attorney would know if there were a conflict.
 
  • #1,598
It may be and it may no be. That is why I'm asking the question.

He many have not been there, but 5-6 days is not a big gap.

MOO.

All I can suggest is that you do some research and try to find the answer you are looking for.

I seriously doubt it is any conflict of interest. Joseph Thompson would be very well versed in the law.
 
  • #1,599
I think it's safe to assume the attorney would know if there were a conflict.
You would be wrong. I have seen enough problems that attorney's have faced, including a former PA Supreme Court Justice, with these kinds of issues.

You might to look at some of the Penn State scandal threads

MOO
 
  • #1,600
All I can suggest is that you do some research and try to find the answer you are looking for.

I seriously doubt it is any conflict of interest. Joseph Thompson would be very well versed in the law.
It won't be up to me. but up to the prosecution. It is a question of timing and involvement.

IMO
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
674
Guests online
3,396
Total visitors
4,070

Forum statistics

Threads
641,140
Messages
18,769,049
Members
244,740
Latest member
rob1roy
Back
Top