• #2,601
I was responding to the overall tone of the piece, not the minute details.
Right. Because it was not an opinion piece. It was factual reporting.

I didn't see a tone. It might be you didn't like the facts?

MOO
 
  • #2,602
Right. Because it was not an opinion piece. It was factual reporting.

I didn't see a tone. It might be you didn't like the facts?

MOO
We disagree, and it'd be nice to just leave it at that without your condescending remarks.
 
  • #2,603
"The problem, some former Civil Rights Division lawyers say, is that the section in the FACE Act criminalizing interference at houses of worship fundamentally misstates the rights people have under the First Amendment.

The First Amendment protects individuals' religious freedom from government interference. But it does not protect them from interference by private individuals, like the protesters and journalists charged in the indictment, they say. "

No wonder there was a clean-up at the CR division.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
108
Guests online
2,594
Total visitors
2,702

Forum statistics

Threads
646,213
Messages
18,855,663
Members
245,936
Latest member
dieharddenny
Top