- Joined
- Jan 12, 2016
- Messages
- 16,076
- Reaction score
- 154,756
I was looking at the Philando Castile case. According to one juror, the wording of the law was the main factor leading to the verdict.
@PrairieWind was saying this might an obstacle for jurors.
On July 6, 2016, Philando Castile, a 32-year-old black American, was pulled over while driving in Falcon Heights, MN who was shot killed by Officer Yanez.
After five days and more than 25 hours of deliberation, the jury decided that the state had not met its burden for a conviction. Yanez would have faced up to 10 years under Minnesota law if he had been convicted. The jury that determined Yanez's fate consisted of seven men and five women. Two jurors were black. Following the acquittal, a jury member told the press that the specific wording of the law regarding culpable negligence was the main factor among many leading to the verdict.
Shooting of Philando Castile - Wikipedia
This is disturbing. But doesn't come close to the Noor Trial. Justine didn't have a gun. She was wearing pink pajamas.
Noor was terminated after the incident. Yanez was not. That, in and of itself, does carry some weight.