MN -- woman shot in face and killed by ICE, Minneapolis, 7 Jan 2026

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reactions
  1. Reactions are disabled for this thread
  • #1,981
The video the agent shot with his phone. Watch his position and the position of the car. The car is moving. He is not. He is standing toward the passengers side. When the car turns to point at him he takes a couple steps to the driver's side to get out of the way and she accelerates.
I've watched that video numerous times. He positioned himself in front of the vehicle, after RG turned her wheels to leave the agent shot twice through the front windshield and as the vehicle turned he shot once more through the side driver's window. At no time did I see the vehicle hit the shooter or anyone else. MO
 
  • #1,982
  • #1,983
The agent is standing in front of the vehicle when he unholsters his firearm, but only after the driver shifts into drive and initiates forward movement. The entire sequence occurs within a split second. imo

Funny, that there is no forward movement visible in that sequence of photos I posted.
IMO.
 
  • #1,984
Folks this incident is neither black or white imho. I will say again I think Ms Good was just trying to leave the situation and did not register in that split second that the agent was in front of her car. The agent may have first seen the car reversing so he approached from the front just as she put the car in drive. He was faced with a vehicle moving forward towards him and again in that split second thought she was intentionally trying to hit him. He may have heard someone shouting “drive baby drive” which heightened that fear. I truly think he feared danger and responded by shooting her. I truly hope a fair assessment of what happened can be made without the political bias of people. What a cluster “ you know what” this is.
 
  • #1,985
I realize you made that post now, so not sure why you responded to me by talking about this shooting. You said that ICE agents shot them, took off and left them there to die without rendering aid or calling for help. That's your right to not believe them, but in the shooting you were referring to, it doesn't change the fact that the people who were shot left the scene as shown by the 911 call made by them from a different location 2-3 miles away. That's not CBP saying that, that's the 911 call saying that.v And according to the statements made by the police chief, the agents were apparently still on scene. You can dispute how the actual shooting in that case happened but it's clear from everything the agents did not leave them there to die without rendering aid or calling for help.
It seems like a human response to try to get away from someone shooting you. Facts are still coming out. JMO
 
  • #1,986
Folks this incident is neither black or white imho. I will say again I think Ms Good was just trying to leave the situation and did not register in that split second that the agent was in front of her car. The agent may have first seen the car reversing so he approached from the front just as she put the car in drive. He was faced with a vehicle moving forward towards him and again in that split second thought she was intentionally trying to hit him. He may have heard someone shouting “drive baby drive” which heightened that fear. I truly think he feared danger and responded by shooting her. I truly hope a fair assessment of what happened can be made without the political bias of people. What a cluster “ you know what” this is.
Shooting her 3 to 4 times though? In the head? How much was he actually paying attention though as he was filming with his phone as well?
 
  • #1,987
That’s a story people - even the Portland Police chief - picked up and ran with, and now they’re having to walk it back. imo

I thought there was a thread for that… Hmph! imo


Police Chief Bob Day said the two suspects wounded in a U.S. Customs and Border Protection encounter had a “nexus” to the gang, backing up a Department of Homeland Security statement released earlier in the day.

I wonder which part made him cry. imo
Maybe you misunderstood my reasoning for bringing the PDX case up--to indicate a pattern of behavior and story line by ICE agents--blaming the victims and claiming use of "vehicle as a deadly weapon".
 
  • #1,988
Folks this incident is neither black or white imho. I will say again I think Ms Good was just trying to leave the situation and did not register in that split second that the agent was in front of her car. The agent may have first seen the car reversing so he approached from the front just as she put the car in drive. He was faced with a vehicle moving forward towards him and again in that split second thought she was intentionally trying to hit him. He may have heard someone shouting “drive baby drive” which heightened that fear. I truly think he feared danger and responded by shooting her. I truly hope a fair assessment of what happened can be made without the political bias of people. What a cluster “ you know what” this is.
It's in living color.

A lot of red.

Ms. Good was driving carefully, slowly, and not threatening the shooter with her car until she was shot. Then, her dead or dying body endangered a light pole.

MOO
 
  • #1,989
Sbm

He was faced with a vehicle moving forward towards him and again in that split second thought she was intentionally trying to hit him.

Let's say that was true. Shooting and incapacitating the driver does nothing to stop the vehicle. It's against their training and policies because it only increases the danger.
 
  • #1,990
The agent may have first seen the car reversing so he approached from the front just as she put the car in drive. He was faced with a vehicle moving forward towards him and again in that split second thought she was intentionally trying to hit him.

Shooting a driver of a moving car is strictly against procedures of the LE. Also, from the photographs you can see the car was not moving towards the agent, rather the opposite. So if dude's first reaction for a driver switching his car into drive is shoot'em in the head, he has no business being armed and on the streets.

IMO
 
  • #1,991
Same here. And I'm honestly surprised that this post you made has not been as well.

Now I remember Exactly why I have not posted nor visited Websleuths for several years. It is an utter waste of my time. Why spend my valuable time posting something when there is a significant possibility it will simply be removed? As much as I despise sites with no oversight, I also can't understand those where there is overkill of censorship. Yeah, this is a sensitive subject, but so what? Lots of subjects are these days. I think we can handle it and use our own judgement. I choose to block people, and it works just fine. I'd rather err on the side of allowing people to express their opinions, rather than delete them willy nilly, subject to the opinion of moderators.
I feel the same...
It's so frustrating.
I just don't understand how anyone can think this was a justified kill. It's beyond me. Even if Ross felt threatened, and if he did he should have been on high alert without his phone in one hand, there was no reason to shoot 4 or 4 times to someone's head.
The cruelty and callousness and inhumanity is mind boggling.
 
  • #1,992
Maybe you misunderstood my reasoning for bringing the PDX case up--to indicate a pattern of behavior and story line by ICE agents--blaming the victims and claiming use of "vehicle as a deadly weapon".
Right. They have made the claim before and it has not been credible. But this case is this case. The claim that the shooter was in danger is not credible again.

MOO
 
  • #1,993
You do know that George Soros pays for a lot of far left protesting/agitation, right?
And I was asking who paid her. I didn’t say someone paid her.
Protesting is a citizen's right. Shooting protesters is what totalitarian regimes do.

MOO, just in case.
 
  • #1,994
No. Please stop telling me that this is in the video. It is not.

It simply is not. I have watched it. There is no reason to think the shooter was in danger from the victims car.

In addition, as has already been discussed ad nauseam, if it were true it would mean that he should get out of the path and should not shoot the driver. A dead driver does not change course.

MOO

thank you thank you..........
How could one even put *that* in writing???
 
  • #1,995
<modsnip:quoted post removed>
They are doing immigration enforcement. That is their job. To find illegal immigrants and detain them. <modsnip: quoted post removed>

There are steps to become a legal citizen or obtain a legal right to live in the US. If people don't want to go through the legal process of obtaining citizenship or refugee status/asylum it doesn't magically make them being here legal and fine.

And it doesn't make Law Enforcement or immigration officials the bad guys for enforcing the laws of the US.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,996
  • #1,997
<modsnip:quoted post removed> They are doing immigration enforcement. That is their job. To find illegal immigrants and detain them. <modsnip: quoted post removed>

There are steps to become a legal citizen or obtain a legal right to live in the US. If people don't want to go through the legal process of obtaining citizenship or refugee status/asylum it doesn't magically make them being here legal and fine.

And it doesn't make Law Enforcement or immigration officials the bad guys for enforcing the laws of the US.
Why did ICE agents stop their car after driving past her to go back and confront her? In what way did going back to confront a bystander that they had already driven past assist them in locating and detaining undocumented felons?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,998
Folks, RNG was on her own street after dropping off her son at school.

ICE violated its own policies and this incident does not meet the legal standard for a reasonable expectation of harm or death.

You do not have to get out of your car for ICE agents. It is outside standard LE training for any officer to stand in front of a vehicle. He should not have drawn his weapon, much less fired it with his partners nearby and countless other unarmed civilians. Including those in their homes.

Her last words were. “That’s fine, dude. I’m not mad at you.”

His immediate words after shooting her were “F***ing B***.”

JR should turn himself in.
 
  • #1,999
Folks this incident is neither black or white imho. I will say again I think Ms Good was just trying to leave the situation and did not register in that split second that the agent was in front of her car. The agent may have first seen the car reversing so he approached from the front just as she put the car in drive. He was faced with a vehicle moving forward towards him and again in that split second thought she was intentionally trying to hit him. He may have heard someone shouting “drive baby drive” which heightened that fear. I truly think he feared danger and responded by shooting her. I truly hope a fair assessment of what happened can be made without the political bias of people. What a cluster “ you know what” this is.

This is actually why we MUST really really be discussing how ill-trained, emotionally unfit this "officer" is.
THIS is what must be changed.
If certains have their way---- . can you imagine watching all of US LE being excused, lied about and defended for such actions.

Much of ICE is unfit right now. We must get stop-gaps in place to prevent this ---IF they are going to be glorified, defended, and *good* actions........ can you imagine what additional LE forces will become. THE DOJ is well on its way (moo), but it ALL could go this way..........

It is totally frightening for ALL ALL Americans.

lies lies lies.... will kill us all.
 
  • #2,000
Why did ICE agents stop their car after driving past her to go back and confront her? In what way did going back to confront a bystander that they had already driven past assist them in locating and detaining undocumented felons?

Couple of reasons off the top of my head would be that putting your car in a position to block the road is a safety hazard for everyone, ICE and other motorists.

Second as I said before I don't think any Law Enforcement will just drive by a car that is sideways in the street and keep on truckin'. Of course under any circumstances they will stop and see if the person needs assistance or why their car is positioned in that manner in the street.

In this case it was obvious they didn't need any assistance and were simply trying to block the road to impede their operation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
47
Guests online
1,613
Total visitors
1,660

Forum statistics

Threads
638,464
Messages
18,728,842
Members
244,444
Latest member
not_weird_boi
Back
Top