Suspect Actions, Not Same as Probable Cause.
But as to post's other point: "... if Police thought that JW’s actions were suspect they would have arrested him..."
On Tuesday night or in the next couple days? Arrest for what criminal offense? Existence of three dead bodies in back yard? Bodies w "no obvious signs of foul play" IIRC, per LE in early statements. A strange, unusual, weird, downright hinky circumstance? Absolutely, positively yes. But a homicide arrest --- of anyone--- before tox tests were done? Before autopsy reports w CoD & MoD were completed? Nope.
To arrest, more than “suspect” actions is needed.
To establish probable cause for an arrest, LE needs evd. that
--- a crime has been committed, which CoD & MoD in autopsy reports may (or may not) provide and
--- a certain person did it.
As ^ post said, LE has more info now. In the meantime, JW is presumed innocent.
imo
ETA: added a couple sentences.
snipped for focus @Data Sleuth First, I do not understand the witch-hunt for JW either.Personally I do not understand the witch-hunt for JW. Clearly LE has a bunch of info that we are not privy too, if Police thought that JW’s actions were suspect they would have arrested him prior to him checking into rehab.
At this point JW should be considered innocent until proven otherwise by LE and/or a court of law.
But as to post's other point: "... if Police thought that JW’s actions were suspect they would have arrested him..."
On Tuesday night or in the next couple days? Arrest for what criminal offense? Existence of three dead bodies in back yard? Bodies w "no obvious signs of foul play" IIRC, per LE in early statements. A strange, unusual, weird, downright hinky circumstance? Absolutely, positively yes. But a homicide arrest --- of anyone--- before tox tests were done? Before autopsy reports w CoD & MoD were completed? Nope.
To arrest, more than “suspect” actions is needed.
To establish probable cause for an arrest, LE needs evd. that
--- a crime has been committed, which CoD & MoD in autopsy reports may (or may not) provide and
--- a certain person did it.
As ^ post said, LE has more info now. In the meantime, JW is presumed innocent.
imo
ETA: added a couple sentences.
Last edited: