MO - Grief & protests follow shooting of teen Michael Brown #10

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #861
But then who gets the blame when the person running away from the cop feels desperate enough to go take a hostage or something? "The cop should have stopped him" Lose/lose.
yeah it is not an easy situation for any officer.
 
  • #862
If I understand your question correctly, I don't think so.

The diagram is the generic anatomical drawing used in medicine, based on what parts of a body are ventral (front) and dorsal (back).

Those aspects retain their names, whichever direction they are facing when a body part is flexed or extended, pronated, etc...

ETA - what will matter will be what's written in the textual analysis of the tissues/histological data. That's where they detail entry vs exit and trajectory.

I found the lack of this information by Baden to be somewhat suspicious, although, a previous autopsy would have made those things less easy to analyze, especially if it's true that the body was also already embalmed.

Personally, I don't find much value in Baden's autopsy or analysis, much less commentary for many reasons, but that's jmo.
I'm nit picking I know, but the size of the body showing the entry wounds is also much leaner than MB. Imo MB chest and upper arm are in contact much of the time.
His size alone makes being shot from behind almost impossible at least in the upper arm anyway.
6 ft 4 and 280# is a BMI of about 33.4%..
jmo

Example
ce06fab3f2c7e81fa7690fac2739feb5.jpg



All posts are MOO
 
  • #863
Would it be possible that OW had his mike open during the attack and there is a record of it? I don't know what the new equipment LE has is capable of doing.
 
  • #864
For the shot to come at MB as he was running away, it would mean DW missed the center by (mis-)aiming toward the right. The other shots that we know came from the front from the autopsy were "off" or mis-aimed to the left of his body. Right? The way the shots line up, I'm thinking that shot was in a series that hit his right arm from the front.

The drawing as prepared by Baden and signed by both he and Parcells is the attachment to my post. Parcells during the press conference pointed out on the drawing of the rear of the body and indicated with a red mark where he thought it could be possible one of those arm wounds came from behind. While running, your arms are not stationary by your side they are in motion, pumping back and forth. The wound he indicated MIGHT have come from behind but no one can say conclusively was a wound to the to the inner forearm. When running, and pumping arms back and forth, that section of the inner forearm can be exposed.

The photo at this link shows a screen shot of the press conference and you can see the red mark on the arm on the rear view of the body in the drawing. http://triblive.com/mobile/6636507-96/autopsy-brown-wecht

Hope that helps :)
 
  • #865
Did you see how they all put their arms up?

It's laughable! IMO

Wilson may have missed center mass... But he was certainly aiming for it. He definitely wasn't aiming ABOVE the head of Brown like Rev. Al and everyone else on that stage is trying their hardest to convince everyone of.

It's disgraceful, dishonest and a blatant attempt to incite and manipulate.

All IMO


Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkView attachment 57490

Maybe they're doing the WAVE?

Not the right smiley but close :welcome4:
 
  • #866
  • #867
For the shot to come at MB as he was running away, it would mean DW missed the center by (mis-)aiming toward the right. The other shots that we know came from the front from the autopsy were "off" or mis-aimed to the left of his body. Right? The way the shots line up, I'm thinking that shot was in a series that hit his right arm from the front.

Yes, IF all the wounds to the arm came from a distance and not near the car it would stand to reason that the wounds to the arm are all following a track or sight line as the officer attempted to adjust toward center

I think the hand wound and chest wound are from same bullet and the arm wounds I believe came for the front as MB was ambulating toward OW. that is my current theory but yours works too.
 
  • #868
I'm nit picking I know, but the size of the body showing the entry wounds is also much leaner than MB. Imo MB chest and upper arm are in contact much of the time.
His size alone makes being shot from behind almost impossible at least in the upper arm anyway.
6 ft 4 and 280# is a BMI of about 33.4%..
jmo

Example
ce06fab3f2c7e81fa7690fac2739feb5.jpg



All posts are MOO
I don't think you're nitpicking at all! :) I totally agree, and that's why I felt it was suspicious that that was the only thing that they publicized.

Partial truths can be more useful than lies to anyone inclined to mislead.
 
  • #869
  • #870
I'm nit picking I know, but the size of the body showing the entry wounds is also much leaner than MB. Imo MB chest and upper arm are in contact much of the time.
His size alone makes being shot from behind almost impossible at least in the upper arm anyway.
6 ft 4 and 280# is a BMI of about 33.4%..
jmo

Example
ce06fab3f2c7e81fa7690fac2739feb5.jpg



All posts are MOO

This is a very, very good point.
 
  • #871
I believe MB was in motion when shot, or else it wouldn't have taken so many shots to neutralize the threat. Or OW was a bad shot. IMO.
 
  • #872
For the shot to come at MB as he was running away, it would mean DW missed the center by (mis-)aiming toward the right. The other shots that we know came from the front from the autopsy were "off" or mis-aimed to the left of his body. Right? The way the shots line up, I'm thinking that shot was in a series that hit his right arm from the front.

Exactly, the shots are in a nearly straight "line". If his arm was hit from behind, and he spun around, OW would have likely missed the next shots or, the "line" would have altered. KWIM?
 
  • #873
Official diagram, released


21nh9cj.jpg


Then @ the press conference, according to the highly esteemed "professor"

n71icy.jpg


Gotta give 'em points for being creative.

He was trying to throw Crump a bone.

Since all those "shots in the back" didn't exist.
 
  • #874
7beb6d79beb8728a35ca3203b2c074f1.jpg



All posts are MOO
 
  • #875
Would it be possible that OW had his mike open during the attack and there is a record of it? I don't know what the new equipment LE has is capable of doing.

What mike??? Do you mean his radio?

I guess it's possible, and maybe that's how the first officer on the scene got there so quickly.
 
  • #876
Yes you can disagree. Posters cannot, however, state things as facts and then argue that those facts are wrong when links have been provided to prove otherwise. When rumors are accepted as fact it hurts the integrity of this website. We are all after the truth and speculation is encouraged but not rumors that have no basis in fact.

It is good to read the rules. Although WS's support law enforcement which is clearly defined in our rules we try to remain objective in all matters of crimes.

When did I state rumours that had no basis in fact?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • #877
And why is that autopsy signed off on 8/19/2014? (unless my eyes are tricking me) I'm not saying anything about the date is underhanded, but didn't they do the autopsy Sunday the 17th?

Also, since when does Dr. B need an assistant? I've never heard of him doing any autopsy with an assistant that ever heard from, esp one with such a voice to the media.

So why is Parcells signature on there if he did not actually perform the autopsy and why is his signature above Dr. Baden's? Would that be normal?
 
  • #878
I believe MB was in motion when shot, or else it wouldn't have taken so many shots to neutralize the threat. Or OW was a bad shot. IMO.

Or his vision was affected by the punch to the eye..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #879
  • #880
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
1,977
Total visitors
2,052

Forum statistics

Threads
632,759
Messages
18,631,311
Members
243,281
Latest member
snoopaloop
Back
Top