Seriously? Is that even possible? If he isn't called, that says hella lot to me!
He hasn't but that doesn't mean he won't be called. There is a month to go yet on this thing.
Seriously? Is that even possible? If he isn't called, that says hella lot to me!
Last night with Don Lemon, the guy's lawyer said something like (paraphrasing) "yeah earlier today the FBI met with my client at my office." And then she said something like, they retrieved whatever they needed to from the recording.
I got the impression that the FBI had taken a copy of the recording, or something like that, IDK. I'm sure they have very sophisticated tools that.
I'm unclear on this (didn't read article yet so not sure if addressed)
Is the DOJ investigating regarding civil rights issues? I feel the reporting on what exactly their role is, is confusing. Are they investigating on a criminal basis or civil, or both?
Before I go... Foxfire, gngr, or any others who've been analyzing the car locations...
I'm still curious about the movement of the suv as seen at the beginning of the Brady video.
Was it Wilson's, and how does it influence our cones, measurements, etc.?
Maybe I'm missing something, but that seems important....?
The WaPo examined DW's life in a guilt-by-association hit piece over the weekend. There were 3 writers named in the by-line and 6 more "contributors" noted at the end. There was nothing at all negative about DW himself anywhere in the article, despite their best efforts to smear him with the tar of a troubled upbringing and a discredited former police department.
The NYT also went dirt-digging over the weekend using 6 named writers/contributors, and also found zip, zero, nada negative about Darren Wilson himself.
Imagine what sworn law enforcement officers across America, active and retired, think when they see this young officer being crucified and terrorized before their very eyes? If a no-bill brings about "massive protests," I hope they're dwarfed by push-back from millions of fellow officers currently waiting and watching, but ready to make themselves heard if DW is sacrificed simply to stop emotionally-driven mobs from burning down their communities.
Not that its important, but the audio suggests to me that at least four shots (after the pause) came after MB turned & faced OW. If all four shots hit MB (big If) that leaves 2 shots hitting MB at the car or as he was rumming away.
Where did they get all this money for the Michal Jackson or the Kennedy? <modsnip>
re As far as I'm concerned, Baden needs to retire while he still has some respect and credibility left. He seemed so shaky, confused, and maybe embarassed in that autopsy briefing with his "assistant", that he made me wonder what was going on. And I do wonder what was/is going on with this gratis autopsy.
Posted link earlier --the female (cant recall name) who did first autopsy clearly stated he had no idea that that fake autopsy dude was going to be with him
re but either way, I want to keep who said what and when straight.
Do not feel alone - most cant either - its a soap opera!
"Breaking" now on CNN, according to the latest report (!) it seems like this might be a case of He said She said- just wanted to everyone to know that
Did they say what took him so long to come forward with this so-called bombshell?
Does anyone think that the people (witnesses included) being interviewed by media are getting paid to give the interviews?
IDK, I think the lawyer said he "realized" the "import" of the recording later.
So what do you think the first volley of shots were about? They were NOT warning shots.
I think the first group of shots hit MB in the arm. OW waited to see if he would stop and he didn't, then the last shots hit the head.
Interesting information I took from his interview: He mentions that people keep calling him a "witness" but he feels that he is also a "victim" and that he not run for cover that he too would have been shot to death.
That is a HUGE stretch to me. He WASN'T shot to death. But MB was shot to death. Why might that be? So he is basically saying that DW decided to shoot and kill one innocent kid in broad daylight, but chose to do nothing about the witness that was "standing right beside him?"
It shows me that MB and DJ both reacted very differently to the situation, which is why one of the men is dead and the other is giving interviews on CNN.
Quote Originally Posted by TheDuchess View Post
Interesting information I took from his interview: He mentions that people keep calling him a "witness" but he feels that he is also a "victim" and that he not run for cover that he too would have been shot to death.
That is a HUGE stretch to me. He WASN'T shot to death. But MB was shot to death. Why might that be? So he is basically saying that DW decided to shoot and kill one innocent kid in broad daylight, but chose to do nothing about the witness that was "standing right beside him?"
It shows me that MB and DJ both reacted very differently to the situation, which is why one of the men is dead and the other is giving interviews on CNN.
Thanks wasn't enough. Great post!
And I still contend that DJ might not have actually "witnessed" much of the shooting. His "crouched down a bit" behind a car can mean a lot of different things, and it could mean his head wasn't raised above the sight line of the car.