MO - Grief & protests follow shooting of teen Michael Brown #18

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
Are GJ members allowed to watch news and read about the case online?

I have wondered this too. Found this, I wonder if they<(jurors) are asked/told not to watch/listen about the case they are hearing. jmo idk

http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/09/opinion/callan-justice-department-jeopardizes-ferguson-case/

The non-sequestered grand jurors who return home every night after scrutinizing evidence in the case are almost certain to hear of the existence of the new federal investigation.
 
  • #222
If you are going to put up a link to a site other than what we know for sure is MSM you need to goggle it first and check if it is political, otherwise it will be taken down. It is very easy to check the site out first before posting it.

Thanks, Lambchop
 
  • #223
Found this vid posted on another site. It's the first few seconds that are interesting...

The vid starts with Brady being interviewed and holding his cell phone up toward the cameras showing what he saw. It's interesting b/c the MSNBC tv interview states there is no audio of the recording, and in this bit, there is clearly audio as the camera is picking it up. 2nd what you hear is Brady say twice, "he ran back to the car, he ran back to the car."

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/recording-may-capture-shots-fired-at-michael-brown.html

Eta: not sure if had already been posted. Remainder of vid very sad, comments from MBs friends and family.

WOW!!!!!

AMAZING ...my hats off to you! I never would have heard that in a million years!

Sure enough he says, "he RAN back"

No audio huh?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #224
WOW!!!!! AMAZING ...my hats off to you! I never would have heard that in a million years! Sure enough he says, "he RAN back"
I'm not hearing it. Exactly where in the vid is that? And what does it mean? We know that MB ran/walked/stumbled back toward OW, but they were both quite a ways from the car at that point.
 
  • #225
@antoniofrench
@Bizzabobby As far as we know. And in both cases, the victims were given toxicology tests but the officers were not.
https://twitter.com/AntonioFrench/status/510403663341568000

Almost 100% sure he's got this wrong. That's usually standard, iirc and with Darren treated at hospital, I bet they did screen him. This sort of disinformation from the rioters' leaders only fuels the fire. Maybe purposefully.

Predictably he's wrong on this. Hope someone calls him on it.

Jackson said blood samples have been taken from Brown and the officer who shot him, with those toxicology tests generally expected to take weeks to complete.
http://www.npr.org/2014/08/11/33948...r-vigil-for-mo-teen-shot-and-killed-by-police

I wonder if anyone oversees aldermen? He should be censured for the reckless way he's behaved.
 
  • #226
i'd be interested in reading the actual proposal - will start searching for it.

i'm assuming that a crb member must be a ferguson resident in good standing and able to conduct business in a confidential manner.

i'd assume the county would appoint these people? just add quite a bit of $ to ferguson's budget - it doesn't come cheap.

edit - i think i found it (even though link calls it a public safety commission) : http://www.scribd.com/doc/239427005/BILL-NO-7063-Establishing-Public-Safety-Commission

edit edit: no salary - yikes! Members of the commission shall serve without compensation

Serious question.

Would the mayor be able to serve? It says must be a resident of the city for 1 year preceding appointment and resident while serving. Or would the mayor have to appoint a designee under the current circumstances? As I recall, he's not a resident of Ferguson.
 
  • #227
It also shows their limitations. The fact that the c-store was looted right AFTER the police released the store's location says a lot. Anyone that was paying any attention would KNOW the store would be looted! The owner is darn lucky he didn't get killed.They just burned down the QT a few nights earlier, yet the authorities did NOT provide police protection to that store owner after releasing the location AND the video?

I am still amazed that they did that.

You mean when Johnson took charge, walked with the protestors, then stood by with his men while the looting was going on?
 
  • #228
LambChop's right.

If anything, I think the police and shopkeepers had more fear of the community than vice versa. Continuously violating the law, acting out of control, ignoring officers' instructions and warnings all displayed for the cameras does not lend itself to LE being the problem.

Post of the day
 
  • #229
It also shows their limitations. The fact that the c-store was looted right AFTER the police released the store's location says a lot. Anyone that was paying any attention would KNOW the store would be looted! The owner is darn lucky he didn't get killed.They just burned down the QT a few nights earlier, yet the authorities did NOT provide police protection to that store owner after releasing the location AND the video?

I am still amazed that they did that.

I think at that point, the police were being largely constrained by others. It was good to see some citizens out guarding buildings. Last count I saw two dozen businesses were looted, and they also tried to burn down a perfectly unrelated BBQ.
 
  • #230
Normandy Middle School Principal temporarily kicked out 20 students.

"One middle school teacher sought medical treatment after being hit in the head by a textbook lobbed by a student."

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/...cle_dd9f1f26-06cb-5326-bcfa-3eec77e6f9c1.html

:thumb: Before I joined here, I was surprised to see reports of students with guns at McCluer. :what:

I feel bad for some of the things Michael went through. He stills owns his choices like those around him do.
 
  • #231
You mean when Johnson took charge, walked with the protestors, then stood by with his men while the looting was going on?

Yup. Just like this store owner that was watching his store being looted on live TV, when he called the police they claimed they had officers at the store and everything was fine. He had to grab some weapons and drive to the store and protect it himself.
 
  • #232
  • #233
  • #234
Serious question.

Would the mayor be able to serve? It says must be a resident of the city for 1 year preceding appointment and resident while serving. Or would the mayor have to appoint a designee under the current circumstances? As I recall, he's not a resident of Ferguson.

according to Ferguson's Code of Ordinances all council members must retain a residence in Ferguson, including the Mayor

3.2.2 Eligibility

All council members and the mayor shall be qualified voters of the city. The council members elected by wards shall be residents of the wards from which they are elected during their entire term of office. No person shall qualify as a candidate for Mayor or Council member who has been convicted of or found guilty of or pled guilty to a felony under the laws of this state or of the United States.
 
  • #235
St. Louis grand jury weighs charges in Ferguson shooting

.....
McCullough, whose office has prosecuted more than 700 murder cases since 1991, has overseen 33 prosecutions of police officers during his 23-year term but has never pressed charges against an officer accused of killing a suspect.

......
said prosecutors review several police shootings each year but rarely pursue charges, largely because laws give police a broad latitude to defend themselves and use deadly force if they believe they are in imminent danger.

.....
there were four cases of police shootings he has brought to a grand jury. None resulted in criminal charges, including a much publicized 2000 case of two law enforcement officers who shot and killed two unarmed black men during a drug bust.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0H62LJ20140911?irpc=932

Thank you, Reuters author Carey Gillam!! It's about time the media started using the word "suspect" and "officer" in the same, lead in sentence about this case!!!

The white officer who shot dead unarmed black teenager Michael Brown in August, spurring a wave of violent protests, would be the first policeman charged for killing a suspect in St. Louis County in more than two decades.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0H62LJ20140911?irpc=932

This case has ALWAYS been about an officer encountering a suspect, from the very instant that there was "a struggle" and an ASSAULT of the officer in his patrol vehicle. If this case had been reported about responsibly and accurately from the very beginning, there may have never been the mobs, riots, looting, burning, and violence.

I hope this article is the beginning of a new approach by MSM to reporting on this case. One that emphasizes the different roles of officer and suspect, and focused on what MB did himself. What he personally did that changed him from an innocent teen on his way to Grandma's house, and into a violent suspect in felony assault of an officer. Because THAT is the story that needs to go national about this case, and the story that the talking heads needs to be talking about. IMO. We desperately need a national discussion about personal responsibility, and consequences, IMO-- personal responsibility on a number of levels.
 
  • #236
  • #237
ITA. The Grand Jury are members of the community and the reason they are given subpoena power is so their questions can be answered.

FWIW, when I was on a GA "sitting" gj like the one in StL, we were told we could get answers for any question we had about anything from any public office in the county. I took that opportunity and went to the planning office, where I uncovered the political shenanigans behind why our road hadn't been paved when others with far fewer houses had. Just FYI, in case you're ever called for gj duty and there's something in your local gov you want to get to the bottom of.
 
  • #238
@antoniofrench
The current policy gives police virtually complete discretion over use of deadly force and whether they "reasonably feared for their life".
6:59am - 12 Sep 14
https://twitter.com/AntonioFrench/status/510397163201757184

He states it. I hope he and his followers began to comprehend it.

Don't count on it. jmo


Antonio French &#8207;@AntonioFrench 2h
@Bizzabobby The diff. between the Powell and Brown cases is the presence of a weapon. With no weapon & 6 witnesses, he should be indicted.
 
  • #239
I have wondered this too. Found this, I wonder if they<(jurors) are asked/told not to watch/listen about the case they are hearing. jmo idk

http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/09/opinion/callan-justice-department-jeopardizes-ferguson-case/

The non-sequestered grand jurors who return home every night after scrutinizing evidence in the case are almost certain to hear of the existence of the new federal investigation.

Wow, good article, and on cnn.com no less.

I suspect that what's going to happen is, the 9 white and 3 black members of the GJ are going to split along racial lines, and there will be no indictment. They need 9 votes for a true bill, and I just can't see that happening, regardless, but it won't surprise me at all if it splits exactly along racial lines. And the rioting and looting will start up again, with the addition of accusations of GJ cover-ups and deliberate mishandling of the GJ case and racism by the GJ itself. Those people in Ferguson are not going to accept the GJ's decision.
 
  • #240
Question -- if the GJ does NOT indict can the prosecutor still press charges? Or is it completely dependent on the GJ decision? I thought I read somewhere that it wasn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
66
Guests online
1,697
Total visitors
1,763

Forum statistics

Threads
632,332
Messages
18,624,858
Members
243,094
Latest member
Edna Welthorpe
Back
Top