MO - Grief & protests follow shooting of teen Michael Brown #7

[QueenD]

I knew Bill O'Reilly would be fired up over Ferguson case!
If you missed his opening segment, try to catch it on the replay later tonight (11 pm)
It's worth a watch!
imo...

It was awesome, I seen it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[jggordo]

I have a question: Does this Purcell have or not have a license as a ME in the state of MO or not? Does anyone know definitively?

 

[AuburnTxTiger]

Didn't Dr Baden state that all bullets hit MB from the front? MB family attorney on Nancy Grace just said everybody agrees MB was shot while running away.

 

[Linda7NJ]

People best walk around buck naked if they want to live!

?
If they want to live they shouldn't break the law and threatened the lives of law enforcement when they show up. With a knife, by charging, lunging, a gun etc... If they want to live. IMO

The lady that called from the barbershop was scared enough to lock herself in and call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[wondering?]

The man who was interviewed by Anderson, lives right near where Michael Brown was killed, he watched what went on and took several photos. He says that Michael was running, may have been after the first shot, the police officer got out, Michael turned, clutched below he stomach, appeared to be falling to the pavement, and the officer shot many times at Michael. The young man with Michael was hiding behind the parked car as he has stated. Michael was a fair distance from the police vehicle, I believe, from what has been shown and said. How did he get there if he was not running?

Remember, this is as I heard it.

 

[EvilSoup]

I often wonder if people confuse what discussion forums are about. Posters are not jurors, their comments are not evidence, the members have no power to convict or acquit. It's simply an exchange of opinions and information. Some people want to be able to control the thoughts and opinions of others, an impossible task. I also think it pertinent that participation in discussion is voluntary.

That said, reviewing the threads here might give one a better idea of how people's opinions have transformed. There's a lot of explanation as to how people have arrived where they are right now. And there are many unanswered/ignored questions asked of those who seem upset with a notion that Wilson was justified. Seems many simply left when it appeared the case was heading in the "justified" direction. If you are interested in a discussion, I am sure the questions can be asked again. If you are interested in a particular conclusion, I think that is unlikely.

Respectfully, some of us have asked questions and speculated in ways that are not popular with the majority and were treated rather rudely for having a dissenting view.

I agree a discussion forum is for, well, discussion. But when only one side of a discussion is permitted, it becomes a back-slapping, high-fiving session and not discussion.

In my OPINION.

I also was curious about the uber political discussion, but then I read the suggestion to take the political talk to the basement. So, that makes things less hostile for some, and thanks!

My confusion and upset last night was mostly over not understanding how these threads work. I thought FB links, accusing victims and posting facts without links were all big time not allowed.

BUT, I almost exclusively read the Crimes Against Children threads, which are different.

When I came to participated in this thread last night, I was in total "OMG! Against the rules against the rules!" mode. I had not ever seen this kind of posting before and it caught me off guard.

I assumed the difference was because of bias, but I now think that different types of discussions have different rules. I am sorry for being this guy :scared: but I have always tried to tiptoe around what I would LOVE to say about so-called "victims" but was not allowed, and also all the Facebook links and copy and pastes.....

I am new to the "current events" TOS. So I apologize for freaking out about the comments I read. I did not mean to be a troublemaker. I was just shocked.

 

[Isabelle]

But why did the recorder put music over the video preventing us to hear the verbal interaction?

Seriously, why?

Music? Glad I'm not the only one that didn't hear it. Are you taking pain meds? Once long ago I had taken lortab for pain and while lying down I heard music in my ear against the pillow but nothing in the other ear. I think it was an auditory hallucination.

 

[teedie2]

This link is live at the moment, if you want to look at people milling around, and the noise of motors.

http://new.livestream.com/accounts/9035483/events/3271930

But . . . .

Where is Tim Pool? Is he on now? If so, may I have a link?

 

[AuburnTxTiger]

I have a question: Does this Purcell have or not have a license as a ME in the state of MO or not? Does anyone know definitively?

This was posted last night by a RN Anesthetist:

K_Z
K_Z Verified Anesthetist




Shawn Parcells, man of many invented credentials. A legend in his own mind.

Regarding Shawn Parcells, the "assistant" to the eminent Dr. Baden, who conducted the private family second autopsy of MB.

Decide for yourself how much weight to give to his "work" and his "professional opinions." I can't link ALL the professional blog comments about him lol! I might ask a mod if those sites can be linked, but there is enough on the authorized sites to keep one busy reading for a while. I understand why the Brown family attorneys contracted his business, but I'm baffled why anyone keeps giving this man a microphone to talk. (Oh. Wait. Maybe I'm not baffled at all, lol!) Incidentally, Shwan Parcells also has a ministry business, Shawn Parcells Ministries. (Can't link all the blogs there either.)

Apparently, there is a lot of $$ to be made in the "private autopsy" business. Average price is $3000 cash. Nice WSJ article on same. Lots of outsourcing from counties and municipalities to private companies-- largely unregulated. That seems to be a bit of a problem to me for criminal cases, or insurance cases, etc.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/m...6a176ea4d.html

http://cjonline.com/news/2011-10-25/...rovide-options

http://www.linkedin.com/company/parc...athology-group

http://www.macon.com/2011/09/30/1725...-to-death.html

Shawn L. Parcells, a forensic pathologist assistant and founder of Parcells Forensic Pathology Group, testified an underlying infection likely led to disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Read more here: http://www.macon.com/2011/09/30/1725...#storylink=cpy

http://www.newspressnow.com/life/art....html?mode=jqm

By transporting the body from the funeral home to the morgue in his black SUV and bringing along his own autopsy tools, he saves coroners both time and money.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...50622802772994

http://www.nationalautopsyservices.com/

Lol-- here is a RECENT article that refers to him as "Professor Shawn Parcells!" His sum total of "professor" experience was ONE DAY of shadowing. He has no degree higher than a bachelor's degree. (Lol-- not even university "faculty", contract or affiliate, would try that stunt! Talk about credential inflation, whoooweee!) But WAIT!! Now he's an "instrumental participant". Or is he a Professor? Which is it? Getting whiplash here from all the fake credentials flying around!

http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/local...aden/14233029/

Professor Shawn Parcells, an instrumental participant in the autopsy evaluation, said Brown could have survived five of the wounds, but one, which hit the apex of his head, went through is brain and was not survivable.
You know, sometimes one just has to stop looking. There is just too much out there about this man's invented credentials for me to give a single instant of respect to anything he has to say clinically. He needs desperately to STFU, IMO. Or the media need to get a REAL "google clue" about this man!

 

[SStarr33]

Great comment here by JS about the new shooting

https://www.facebook.com/FOX2Now

 

[CARIIS]

Our family had to buy the bullet proof vest for our loved one. They are not simply handed out as mandatory equipment.

THey pass out machine guns, tons of arsonal, tanks, bombs, rifles but no vests ........humm something is seriously off here!

 

[Observer in AZ]

I think Nancy Grace is suffering from the middle aged crazies.

She repeating herself for the 4th time like she went to commercial and back again?

I noticed that the other night it's like she packs in 15mins of info in 60 mins.. JMHO

 

[mdana]

You certainly are making a sweeping generalization of the Marines and your generalization is simply wrong. Young offenders were never given the option of service in the United States Marine Corps rather than avoiding jail time. The Marines has always been an elite branch of the U.S. Navy. In 1968, military service was mandatory unless you had a legit exemption such as college and even then a man had to go into the service after college graduation. My older brother became a Marine Corps officer AFTER college graduation and the application process and the boot camp were rigorous. My BIL was in a street fight in Kansas City and was given a choice between jail and the U.S. Navy, Army or Air Force. He chose the Navy.

Frankly, I think the nation's problems with youth violence and gang activity would be alleviated considerably if they would once again implement the draft with mandatory service. But nobody has ever been able to enlist in the Marines to avoid jail. That's an insult to every Marine out there past and present.

JMO

I did not mean any disrespect. My uncle served in Korea and Vietnam, and was given the option to serve as opposed to doing jail time. He served in the Army, Navy (stationed near KC when he met my aunt), and Marines. He survived 2 helicopter crashes in Vietnam and was the only survivor in one. I read the press reports in the AP or UPI. He served lastly in the Marines, so I assumed the Marines had the same option, but I must be wrong. I appreciate your input.

He was a year under the legal age for entering, even with parental consent. I think the original officer wrote down the wrong year of birth. His dad wanted him out of the house, jail or military, so bad he wouldn't correct the mistake. His dad was a real piece of work according the stories my uncle told me.

The Draft is a terrible peace time solution. The military is not right for everyone as my uncle told me countless times. He thought it would kill me, figuratively.

I had a friend that was an army ranger. He had a son, I found to be very similar to me in temperament at the same age. The father told me he wanted him to join the military to get his act together. As mildly as possible, I told him I thought that was maybe not a good idea, because I didn't think it was a good fit. Since, I had never served in the military, I was never real strong about voicing my concern. I wasn't the boy's father. The boy ended up committing suicide soon after he came out basic training. I am not blaming the military (the mother did and tried to get a criminal investigation), but I can't think it helped.

-JMO

 

[oh_gal]

She repeating herself for the 4th time like she went to commercial and back again?

I noticed that the other night it's like she packs in 15mins of info in 60 mins.. JMHO

I noticed that if she doesn't agree with what her guests are saying, she cuts to commercial.

 

[Linda7NJ]

Respectfully, some of us have asked questions and speculated in ways that are not popular with the majority and were treated rather rudely for having a dissenting view.

I agree a discussion forum is for, well, discussion. But when only one side of a discussion is permitted, it becomes a back-slapping, high-fiving session and not discussion.

In my OPINION.

I also was curious about the uber political discussion, but then I read the suggestion to take the political talk to the basement. So, that makes things less hostile for some, and thanks!

My confusion and upset last night was mostly over not understanding how these threads work. I thought FB links, accusing victims and posting facts without links were all big time not allowed.

BUT, I almost exclusively read the Crimes Against Children threads, which are different.

When I came to participated in this thread last night, I was in total "OMG! Against the rules against the rules!" mode. I had not ever seen this kind of posting before and it caught me off guard.

I assumed the difference was because of bias, but I now think that different types of discussions have different rules. I am sorry for being this guy :scared: but I have always tried to tiptoe around what I would LOVE to say about so-called "victims" but was not allowed, and also all the Facebook links and copy and pastes.....

I am new to the "current events" TOS. So I apologize for freaking out about the comments I read. I did not mean to be a troublemaker. I was just shocked.

I think we can discuss anything that's discussed by the MSM.
I could be wrong though...shrug


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Ms Suzanne]

Ooooh Nancy is on FIRE!!!
Daryl Parks...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Darn.I don't have cable. What is saying please.

 

[Linda7NJ]

I noticed that if she doesn't agree with what her guests are saying, she cuts to commercial.

Annoyed me when pretzel dude was going to explain trajectory through the skull possibilities and was cut off... Arghhh


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[cady]

JMO Maybe people are really enjoying the sleuthing of Sean Parcells. It just seems to me that if you think that he is not credible, IGNORE him! He is not a pathologist, and Dr Baden is not parroting his speculation. Baden speaks for himself. Basically, we are not much closer to fact in terms of Baden's autopsy, because Baden did not have the clothing for starters. There are 3 autopsies. Let's see all of them.JMO

 

[AuburnTxTiger]

I think Nancy Grace is suffering from the middle aged crazies.

At least Nancy Grace had enough wits about her to tell Parcells that she had never heard of a bullet making a U turn!

 

[Ms Suzanne]

Who is the "new witness" CNN is talking about? Thanks

There's a new witness? What are they saying.