Actually it does since she made a global comment about any footage during the trip as this was the comment that she was responding to about footage being obtained anywhere along the way:
It's pretty discouraging that the FBI hasn't figured out what happened yet. Someone drove the car from MT to WA, put gas in it, and used her credit card... That person must be on video somewhere
And this was her response about footage from anywhere on the trip:
The gas stations did not have cameras at the pumps. I do know that. So no, they dont. They are doing all they can. It takes time. Forensics, they have to get DNA and fingerprints from myself, my dad, and anyone that was in the car or touched it to rule out DNA. The autopsy takes time to write up. Bullistics from the gun, that takes time. It all takes time. I believe they are working as hard as they can.
If we're going to look at the social media responses she's making, you have to see what she is responding to as she wasn't making a general comment about the article but instead responding to someone's comment in the article about the availability of any footage during the entire trip and she answered that by speaking plural about multiple gas stations.
All we have, is that in that specific response...she is saying the DM picture is not accurate. The timeline is off and the card was used AT THE PUMP and not inside.
We are allowed to disagree, I'm fine with disagreements about people or information. I happen to think she is not lying, and that when she says the card was used at the pump, and there were not cameras there...I believe it.
**Since the other gas station was not asked about specifically, and her response was in regards to Ritzville...I have no formed opinion about what may or may not be known about the other station.