- Joined
- Jul 28, 2022
- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 1,402
Seems odd that we have never heard what time TC returned home after dropping NG off on the night of the abduction.
Everything else in the timeline released comes from electronic data--phone logs, garage door opening, car data. LE has determined what time the family member arrived and when the call to 911 was made.
Thats because they have no corroborated information about thatSeems odd that we have never heard what time TC returned home after dropping NG off on the night of the abduction.
Why do you think it's the family?They need to get back to the family
Are you suggesting a random person attended Nancy's home within an hour of her going missing, and fumbled around at her front door with a ski mask, gloves, backpack and gun, and had nothing to do with her disappearance?
What, prey tell, do you think he was doing there if not abducting Nancy?
Yes, I’m suggesting that she was murdered and didn’t make it home at all, and this is a coverup. Read: staged.
You have no proof at all there is any footage of this person on the camera carrying her out of the house.
You act like you’re part of the FBI but I doubt you can provide evidence of this…
No corroboration that she ever made it home from AG and SIL home that night. Her digital devices did but that's not proof enough. So you always concentrate on the last people with a victim.Why do you think it's the family?
I'm sure the APS office will be flooded with calls looking for this worker whose last name is not even listed on the card. Is that the standard format?I wonder when that card was left in the timeline, must be after Nancy went missing as she would have seen it otherwise?
Likely to protect his family - 20 law enforcement cars following him (sarcasm) - he gets out in case they start getting wild. MOOThe bizarre part of his story to me is that he says the police were following the car that his wife was driving. His wife pulled over the car and he got out of the passenger side before the police ever turned on their lights? Who does that?
Not sure he's an idiot as he still has not been identified after all this time. MOOI find it quite fascinating to watch this character at Nancy's door trying to work out how to obscure a camera AFTER it's already captured their image. I guess now it's clear why the initial kidnapping took so long, it's because they're a bumbling idiot. How they managed avoid capture thus far is a mystery.
This likely was Nancy's regular Sunday morning routine and has likely has been verified by police. MOOHas it been verified that it was a 9 a.m. service because from my understanding there was two different services with two different times (which both included online viewing) like many churches have?
The blood is a big sign she made it home.No corroboration that she ever made it home from AG and SIL home that night. Her digital devices did but that's not proof enough. So you always concentrate on the last people with a victim.
No. 7 minutes from when the family member arrived at Nancy's house, they called 911.
Here's the timeline established by the Pima County Sheriff and FBI.
View attachment 643770
![]()
A timeline of the disappearance of and search for Nancy Guthrie
Five days into the desperate search for 84-year-old Guthrie, the mother of “Today” show host Savannah Guthrie, investigators on Thursday released a detailed timeline.www.pbs.org
I can't speak for in the US, but here in Australia there are concerns for privacy of workers in this field so I would assume that is why the last name is omitted.I'm sure the APS office will be flooded with calls looking for this worker whose last name is not even listed on the card. Is that the standard format?
But then let's throw the statistics out the window for a second because obviously the blood was planted!The blood is a big sign she made it home.
I see. Makes sense.No corroboration that she ever made it home from AG and SIL home that night. Her digital devices did but that's not proof enough. So you always concentrate on the last people with a victim.
Right! And someone risks being caught by staging a forced entrance to a house where they look directly into the camera. Come on now people.But then let's throw the statistics out the window for a second because obviously the blood was planted!I'd love to know how many times a perpetrator has actually done that before.
It's pretty easy for them to know what time the 911 call happened. They had that accurately from the start. It was the other time that was reported incorrectly---the time they arrived at Nancy's house.
And that made them look sketchy. And it seemed sketchy it took so long to call 911 but that was inaccurate info. And seemed sketchy that first it was reported that NG's daughter gave her a ride home but was later changed to say her SIL was the last to see her---again, it looked sketchy. But now it's back to daughter driving her home?
Nancy's pacemaker made it home too. We can safely assume it was still inside of her and she was alive.No corroboration that she ever made it home from AG and SIL home that night. Her digital devices did but that's not proof enough. So you always concentrate on the last people with a victim.
The social workers card left in the door. Its concerning. Did she call, did someone else call for elder abuse? Was N being financially or physically abused by someone in her family or a caregiver?Why do you think it's the family?