• #21,021
NG did not show up at friend's house for the 9am digital church sermon. Friends contacted NG family a short time after the digital mass ended and maybe breakfast at the local friend's house ended, so 11:10am. That local family member waited for about an hour, maybe I am wrong, to alert police Mom missing

Has it been verified that it was a 9 a.m. service because from my understanding there was two different services with two different times (which both included online viewing) like many churches have?
 
  • #21,022
I think LE does. They have apple watch data which would track health signs and it is in bluetooth connection with her pacemaker until @2:30, I believe.
Good point...but if she typically took her watch off to charge around say 10pm for example, the heart rate etc data wouldn't show up. I don't have an apple watch so just guessing. If the pacemaker only attempts to connect at 2am ish then it may not be in continuous paring mode. But LE most definitely has all of that data imo
 
  • #21,023
No. 7 minutes from when the family member arrived at Nancy's house, they called 911.
Here's the timeline established by the Pima County Sheriff and FBI.
1770803921421.webp

 
  • #21,024
  • #21,025
I’m getting confused on these posts. I thought someone was saying that it took NG family an hour to report her missing after arriving at her home so I was replying to that info. Yes your info is correct. Sorry, my bad.
Yes, the reason some were saying it took the family an hour to report her missing was because the sheriff originally MISREPORTED what time the family arrived at her home.

Originally he said they were called about 11 am and arrived at 11:10, then called 911 just before noon.

Recently he changed the timeline and has said they arrived at the house just before noon and called 911 quickly.
 
  • #21,026
Yes, I’m suggesting that she was murdered and didn’t make it home at all, and this is a coverup. Read: staged.

You have no proof at all there is any footage of this person on the camera carrying her out of the house.

You act like you’re part of the FBI but I doubt you can provide evidence
DBM
 
Last edited:
  • #21,027
No. 7 minutes from when the family member arrived at Nancy's house, they called 911.
Here's the timeline established by the Pima County Sheriff and FBI.
View attachment 643770
True, but this^^^^ is a NEW timeline. The sheriff originally said the family arrived at the home to check on NG at 11:10 am.
That was incorrect info he was putting out there. LATER he complained that people were taking his statements and details so seriously... :rolleyes:
 
  • #21,028
No. 7 minutes from when the family member arrived at Nancy's house, they called 911.
Here's the timeline established by the Pima County Sheriff and FBI.
View attachment 643770

We don't know where LE are getting the 11:56 a.m. time either - at this point.
 
  • #21,029
Yes, the reason some were saying it took the family an hour to report her missing was because the sheriff originally MISREPORTED what time the family arrived at her home.

Originally he said they were called about 11 am and arrived at 11:10, then called 911 just before noon.

Recently he changed the timeline and has said they arrived at the house just before noon and called 911 quickly.
Honestly all the misreporting, conflicting information and now this recent detainment is such a mess. I was hoping they had more than it appears but it's seeming like they have no idea as to what happened that night. Jmo.
 
  • #21,030
NG had birthday days prior to 1/31/26. So are you saying something like this is appropriate, "Hi Mom, we want to honor your birthday but we can't drive 10 mins to pick you up. Call Uber and get your own ride to our house 4 miles away. But don't worry, we will give you 2 mins to get from car to inside your garage around 9:48pm. Happy Birthday Mom." Despicable behavior imo if NG had to get her own transportation to a family neighborhood like dinner.

The family did what worked for them. We don't know the reason, we aren't entitled to know the reason, Nancy took a rideshare. It is established she did and that she arrived safely at her daughter's house as planned. That's not even in question.
 
  • #21,031
Honestly all the misreporting, conflicting information and now this recent arrest is such a mess. I was hoping they had more than it appears but it's seeming like they have no idea as to what happened that night. Jmo.
DBM
 
  • #21,032
What arrest? 😳
Detained sorry. I'll edit my post.
 
  • #21,033
We don't know where LE are getting the 11:56 a.m. time either - at this point.
It's pretty easy for them to know what time the 911 call happened. They had that accurately from the start. It was the other time that was reported incorrectly---the time they arrived at Nancy's house.

And that made them look sketchy. And it seemed sketchy it took so long to call 911 but that was inaccurate info. And seemed sketchy that first it was reported that NG's daughter gave her a ride home but was later changed to say her SIL was the last to see her---again, it looked sketchy. But now it's back to daughter driving her home?
 
  • #21,034
Some info on guy who was detained and released. This article has interview with mother in law guy who was detained "Carlos"- said his white van is broken (as of a couple days ago) couldn't be him and he is living with her due to being evicted. So this makes me think they are focusing on the previously mentioned white van.

 
Last edited:
  • #21,035
Those cameras have little IR flashlights, thats why the it reflects like a light on the reflective parts of the back pack. He does not have a flashlight in his mouth, you'd see it more. He has a gold or diamond insert on his tooth. Something that would reflect the IR light back just like the backpack did.
If you watch the video of him approaching the steps he uses a flashlight in his mouth to see the steps
 
  • #21,036

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260211_041037_X.webp
    Screenshot_20260211_041037_X.webp
    29.3 KB · Views: 32
  • #21,037
We don't know where LE are getting the 11:56 a.m. time either - at this point.
Everything else in the timeline released comes from electronic data--phone logs, garage door opening, car data. LE has determined what time the family member arrived and when the call to 911 was made.
 
  • #21,038
It's pretty easy for them to know what time the 911 call happened. They had that accurately from the start. It was the other time that was reported incorrectly---the time they arrived at Nancy's house.

And that made them look sketchy.

Agreed but the 911 call happened 7 minutes later. I am just wondering what source they have for the time of 11:56 a.m. to say that that is indeed when the family began to look for Nancy.
Was that cell phone data, a call from the church friend etc.?
 
  • #21,039
  • #21,040
NG had birthday days prior to 1/31/26. So are you saying something like this is appropriate, "Hi Mom, we want to honor your birthday but we can't drive 10 mins to pick you up. Call Uber and get your own ride to our house 4 miles away. But don't worry, we will give you 2 mins to get from car to inside your garage around 9:48pm. Happy Birthday Mom." Despicable behavior imo if NG had to get her own transportation to a family neighborhood like dinner.
I don't think this is the case. It's important to remember that NG has capacity and agency to make her own decisions. This doesn't equate to the family being cruel or disrespectful just because NG got an Uber. Jmo.
 
Chapter 1/4

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
158
Guests online
3,047
Total visitors
3,205

Forum statistics

Threads
644,277
Messages
18,814,410
Members
245,332
Latest member
LaLaloopy
Top