- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
- Messages
- 424
- Reaction score
- 3,793
Slim, I follow you and appreciate your thought. I, too, believe this crime has been premeditated by a very thoughtful and intelligent criminal mind. My question is not a challenge to your position but one of genuine interest about your thought. I believe the Lantana Man video was likely a staged as a distraction: the person in the video is not who kidnapped NG; Lantana Man was possibly hired and given his disguise to distract everyone's attention. Lantana Man probably doesn't even know the person in charge and was hired by him knowing very little. Lantana Man could be an ex-con looking for a buck, hired simply to scare and distract at the residence (that's all he was hired to do, in my scenario). He doesn't want to go back to prison and has thought for years about things he could have done to never get caught again.
How do you reconcile the inconsistent behaviors in the video if Lantana Man is the intelligent, pre-planning psychopath? He's keeping his face away from the camera until he goes to knock on the door, and then he looks repeatedly into the camera. If he's a pre-planner, why wouldn't he have come up with a better idea in advance to take out the camera?
The changes in Lantana's gait and the apparent layers of disguise make me think he's an experienced perp who knows how not to be identified and caught. The melodramatic holster placement and shenanigans with the lantana, along with the inconsistencies described above, scream "staged" to me. I also go back to him never trying the doorknob but apparently about to knock on the door. I think it possible he was there to try to provoke a response by either getting law enforcement to come out or to trigger a Nest notification to the family that a bad guy was at NG's house. I think the video was absolutely expected to be viewed; they didn't anticipate it not being recorded. I think it was staged after NG was already taken from the home. Knocking on the door or ringing the doorbell (which I also think looks possible in the video), he couldn't have expected anyone to answer with him looking like that. He's a distraction to keep us looking in the wrong direction.
As for the real perp's identity, I think you're absolutely right with the psych profile. I also think he's probably obsessed with SG, and, his interest in her unreciprocated, he goes after the thing dear to her, as evidenced in her late 2025 "My Hometown" production.
I once thought he was probably tech sophisticated and that ransom was the long-term plan. I no longer do. This is simply about influencing the object of his obsession.
I would genuinely like to hear your ideas. Mine are only theories, and you may have explanations I haven't considered. Thanks.
Definitely could have been an ex post facto attempt to obfuscate and/or distract, but I suppose if it was staged then her blood on the sidewalk would've had to have been staged as well. It'd be harder to make it look like she went out the front door than to simply bring her out the front door. Or to not even leave any blood at all if you didn't bring her out the front door.
I agree that it could've been taunting, but I feel that the guy on camera is directly responsible for the actual crime. Whether he staged the scene or the camera was merely an unanticipated distraction for him along the way, the odds are that he participated in this crime, and likely even committed it alone.
Even meticulous planners can't/don't necessarily anticipate everything within all steps along the way. He clearly anticipated a camera with the way he approached and dipped his head, but he didn't expect the one that seemed to be literally attached to the front door. That is unusual, because typically they are on the brick moulding to the side.
So even if he was meticulous with his planning and did case the house well beforehand he probably wouldn't have seen that camera in what appears to be an unusual/atypical mounting place.
My main issue is why the front door? Why not an easier, more efficient, and less risky exit?
JMO.
Last edited: