the issues with the sheriff started when he became sheriff. If you're local, you know of the issues, and if you've ever had to work with his dept in some capacity, you know the issues. It's been mentioned a few times in this very long thread and difficult to find now, and if I continue down this line of thought in trying to explain it further, I'll really derail the thread I'm sure

. So I'll just add it's all IMO for all that. IMO no, I don't think someone is throwing Nanos under the bus or trying to. I think someone got lucky with what has happened and the response to it, IMO. I also don't know if this case would go any differently if someone else was in charge as sheriff. I think this would be a difficult case regardless,especially if you have no experience with a high profile case.