I ish we nknew when the image was taken.
If that were the case, I think it would be an expensive and troublesome way to accomplish that goal in addition to exposing oneself to felony kidnapping charges and prison time.Exactly
Could it be possible that someone didn't want her covering the Olympics because they wanted someone else to cover it, not because of her politics, simply for the exposure or experience?
I have had the same experience about something the whole world knows took place except ChatGPT. When I provided evidence from Grok, MSM that proved him wrong, he got mad and started responding in all CAPS saying things like "YOU NEED TO LISTEN TO ME VERY CAREFULLY NOW!" He refused to back down so I did cause his tone was scary! So, if ChatGPT is a little glitchy about big things, I can only imagine what else he's sure about that isn't accurate.
Exactly, Grok is programmed specifically to have "user compliance", and there have been experiments showing how easy it is to train it to give a specific wrong answer to something, just by repeating that wrong answer over and over again.
If I wanted to train it to answer the question, "Where was Donald Trump born" with "on the planet Qo'noS", it wouldn't be that hard to do.
The reason the computer programme's algorithm generated words that read as "mad" is because those are the same words that other humans who use it (or whose data has been fed into it) use, in relation to the same subject. "YOU NEED TO LISTEN TO ME VERY CAREFULLY NOW" sounds exactly like the kind of thing people would type to Grok, leading to it reciting those same lines back to you.
I don't mean to be rude, but I honestly think it's dangerous to anthropomorphise a mindless computer programme by referring to it as "he" or assigning human emotions like "got mad" or "wouldn't back down." A computer programme displaying text that another person originally wrote isn't "not backing down", it's simply displaying the data that's already been fed into it. You typing in the media proof introduced new data, so the next person who asked, likely received a different dataset in response.
Not following. They want the bitcoin paid by a deadline or they'll kill the lady. Pressure to get paid. Apparently they have not received any ransom payment yet and are upping the ante with a deadline and a threat.
We just don’t really know, FBI likely wrote the wording out, SG used their wording when she spoke.I don't know why, but I feel strongly that the word "celebrate" was strange and really out of place given the situation. I think it was a code word. Maybe the kidnappers provided the family with certain words in order to communicate something entirely different. Remember that the kidnappers initially stated, "You will have no way of contacting us." Does that make sense?
THIS. I am SO interested in the probable cause for these warrants.One thing I’m extremely certain of.
When this case is ultimately resolved, the affidavits in support of the search warrants are going to absolutely incredible.
I think so, yes. Which is why a lot of people have been thinking the son in law may have been involved.So, LE only have one person’s word about her return?
Exactly. What I’m saying is if AG/SIL are innocent, there is a reason why they had to check on NG. If they are innocent it’s not a hard timeline to explain, for what reason did they check in on her and go to her house at 11:56. 8 days later and we don’t have that answer? Cmon
Could be an IV/injection site bruising. I get tapped through the forearm. Bruising is common on older people for IV sites. My mothers hands would be completely black and blue on the surface side.I ish we nknew when the image was taken.
If it was taken at her daughter’s home that evening then the family might know how she injured herself.
She could have scraped her home leaving home , blotted it with a tissue , the bandaged it at her daughters home.
Elderly people have skin that is like tissue paper . And with NG having heart problems more than likely she is on blood thinners or aspirin that will make a small scrape bleed like crazy.
Has there been any sighting of TC since AB reported he was allegedly involved?If it is TC, he didn't outsmart them, just delayed the discovery of his involvement. I would like to have seen NG returned last Tuesday or ideally, never taken in the first place, but the initial communication set a 7 - 8 day time period. It will be a shame and a travesty if he is involved but even more of a travesty if he cannot be prosecuted due to overlooked or missing evidence resulting from a hurried investigation. I have every confidence that whomever perpetrated this horrible crime will be identified and solid evidence that cannot be disputed will be brought to light. I can wait for that end of things but I hope there isn't any more waiting for the return of NG. I believe her kidnapping and/or murder will not go unpunished.
You might expect that though -- she may not be likely to contact anyone btwn the alleged drop off time (about 10pm) and when she disappeared. You are dropped off and go to bed.So, LE only have one person’s word about her return?
No - there were some photos of him with AG earlier in the week. Nothing since. I believe he is being interviewed extensively or possibly already arrested.Has there been any sighting of TC since AB reported he was allegedly involved?
Why don't they spend more time, just canvas it all. Why "oh lets go check the tank today" (8 days later) This seems so odd there wouldn't be a huge crew searching every nook and cranny right off.
Yes. The two of them trying to cover their faces in a car.Has there been any sighting of TC since AB reported he was allegedly involved?
So, LE only have one person’s word about her return?