You can post theories. Just include that's it's only your opinion etc.Are we allowed to post theories here if they do not include persons mentioned by name?
You can post theories. Just include that's it's only your opinion etc.Are we allowed to post theories here if they do not include persons mentioned by name?
HmmFwiw, noting..
Nov 12, 2025 rbbm.
''Ann's roofing problem didn't start with a leak.![]()
Valley woman warns of 'too good to be true' door-to-door sales
One Valley woman thought she was saying yes to a great roofing deal. Instead, she nearly lost thousands of dollars. But, before she did anything else, she called Let ABC15 Know.www.abc15.com
She said she was on her couch, watching TV, when her doorbell rang. It was a door-to-door salesman for a roofing company.'
"This guy was so nice, he was so, so nice," Ann said, describing the man who came to her door. " He told me he had gone to a prayer meeting the night before and he had me hooked there!"
Well, I doubt there'd be as much confusion about whether the ransom note was really from the kidnappers, if it had been left that night on Nancy's bed. imoDo we have any proof that a note was NOT left at the home night of abduction?
It was said during the press conference that the uber driver was spoken to already and cleared. I believe it was the sheriff but it was definitely during the latest presser.Don’t have a link, but IMO the Uber driver is significant because he was the last non-family member to have seen NG. JMO. He drove her to Annie’s house, reportedly.
I think that picture was just showing investigators were in there talking to staff thats all.To me, it looks as though he’s chatting with a woman in the kitchen. It doesn’t look like an area that’s open to the public. I’m assuming LE spoke to her to see if she had any information about him. IMO he could be a delivery driver.
Someone will recognize him, IMO.
Is CLR Bruce Rivers a verified source?Are we allowed to post theories here if they do not include persons mentioned by name?
So true. The person who ordered resources to the case probably knows more about it.IMO its about looking at the credibility of AB and Trump, not just in the context of Nancy's disappearance and nothing to do with their job titles or political leaning.
Many of us do this with reporters, podcasters, etc. That's why there's always comments about 'X gets things wrong all the time' or 'X is just covering the case for attention' or 'X has been spot on in previous cases'.
Considering past behaviour, objectivity and reliability, I think, in all fairness, it is okay to determine one person seems more trustworthy than another when there aren't LE sources to back it up.
I just want to take a minute and apologize to all elders and NG. I have seen reference to “tucking in” so many times. I am the one who originally mentioned tucking my 86 year old mom into bed at night and locking her house up when I left. She didn’t want anyone overnight yet. But as I said, my mom was sick and her hospice days were weeks in the future. I literally helped her get in bed, fixed her sheets and blankets, removed her glasses and kissed her cheek. It was as much for me as it was for her. She died a few weeks later. I certainly did not mean to offend so many and wish I’d never used those words. NG did not need tucking in and I never meant to imply that.
I asked the same thing earlier, about ubering there and getting a ride home. Someone else commented that is not 'odd'. I wasn't implying it was, but in this particular situation, you have a woman who was taken from her home while bleeding that same night, it begs for an answer.I feel the same way. I’ll say again, that’s why I love this site… so many different personal perspectives. It really gets you thinking. For me personally my mom is 86 in excellent physical health, fiercely independent and I too would describe her sharp as a tac. With that said, I’ve become increasingly protective of her over the last 10 years. Primarily to keep her desired independence as long as possible.
absolutely. Even though I'm sure it couldn't be the two from out of town (and I'm on the fence about the local) they're going through the scrtutiny for sureYep - how awful for the family though.
One of my questions about this is: did the Uber driver pick Nancy up at her home? Was she somewhere else that was too far for Annie/Tomasso to pick her up?Yup
However, here's a thing I posted a few days ago which has bugged me
Why did NG take an uber to dinner that fateful Sat night?
Hunh - who makes an 84 yr old do that?
Even if she wanted to, I wouldn't let my 84 yr old mom to take an uber.
You might just have the one in a thousand weirdo driver be her driver
Just me I guess
And then she's driven home by the daughter and/or SIL
Which kinda proves my point
Now that's an idea I haven't heard much of yet, the possibility of NG being the target of monetary scams directed at the elderly.Those crypto ATMs are commonly used in scams with the elderly - Crypto ATM Scams: Don’t Let Fraudsters Drain Your Wallet
However, the scam usually involves the victim being directed to insert cash (sometimes they also take debit/credit). I'd wager that the amount the kidnapper is asking for in the ransom letter is far beyond what could be reasonably scammed at one of those machines.
Maybe, though, she had been doing smaller transactions for a while and this was a final escalation? Maybe a smaller-scale scammer realized how connected she is and decided to go for a big payday?
I don't think that's the case, but it makes about as much sense as anything else (so minimal). I do think that, even though NG is reportedly "with it," anyone can fall into these traps. AI can impersonate voices and there's so much data available online for scammers to leverage.
Either way, they should be able to see any transactions or large cash withdrawals on her bank account, and there would almost definitely be security footage on the way to/at the ATM. I'm sure they've checked financials already.
MOO
Details here:I’m interested in what time the email was sent. Was it before or after the news of NG missing and her daughter was a well known newscaster, hit the headlines? The timing may well indicate whether the ransom demand is genuine or not.
haven't seen this asked before. good thinking!i keep meaning to ask this but get caught up with reading more posts:
so the blood at the front door... people saying they think it may have come from her when taken out the front door.... but has anyone said was the front door and security door UNLOCKED!? that's FOUR locks that would have needed to be locked behind them. i don't see that being the case. IMO
the more likely scenario is she was taken out the back (which is probably the way they got in? again IMO
I agree, because even if there's no immediate gain, it's possible that a newly revised will or trust was destroyed, or even anger about being denied money. Perhaps an initial attempt to make an incident appear to be a natural illness or death went wrong. There might have been long simmering anger that we aren't aware of. Much of what happened appears very carefully premeditated. It's baffling though, and other scenarios are possible.door numero uno for me, Monty
way too much being made about the garage door opening imo.Wait. First people were saying the 2 minutes between garage door opening was too long to just get Nancy in the house, and now it wasn’t long enough? I give up.