- Joined
- Aug 28, 2024
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 155
The video is giving "please return the body so we can grieve properly" 
So we can celebrate could be taken both ways? Oh dear.In regards to SGs new instagram post. First impression is that NG is dead (idk why a kidnapper would admit that since it's their only leverage).
Very confused what return our mother so she can celebrate with us means. (Is this in regards to her recent birthday)
They end it by saying "we will pay" (pay for the return of her body? or NG alive)
JMO
Maybe they have seen some sort of proof that the kidnapper(s) have Nancy and so they decided to pay in hopes to get her backI am so confused because what is being shown to the public seems to be totally different than what it seems like is going on behind the scenes.
Agreed. I would imagine that given the amount of time LE was at the house yesterday, any additional “proof” provided in the follow-up message was thoroughly investigated. I imagine that if LE was able to disprove any of that “proof” they would have advised the family as such. The fact that the family released what appears to be a response to the follow-up message suggests to me that there is at least some legitimacy to the note (either the sender really does/did have NG or they know NG/have previously been to the house). MOO.Just when I think things are headed in a different direction this gets posted and we’re back to a kidnapping. I’m entirely kerfluffled.
Some type of proof of life?I was struck by the “this is very valuable to us”. Does that mean anything else on the surface? Seemed odd.
Wow. They will pay. This is crazy.
I feel like that can go either way. Just because they've responded publicly to the ransom demand does not automatically make it legit. It may be the case they feel it is legit, but the response alone does not indicate whether or not it's legit. For arguments sake, lets say its two separate offenders - the family could absolutely believe that paying the ransom will bring their mom home, only to find there was no kidnapping and no amount of ransom money would have ever brought their mother home because there was foul play committed by a different offender. Just my 2 pennies worthDoes this mean the ransom notes are legit?
I think you mean Charles MerrittYes -- you are so on the money. I covered both of those cases and sadly, I went to see McStay in jail with McStay's daughter, a sweet young woman who was SO DESPERATE to prove that her father was innocent. McStay lead me down a lot of rabbit holes. Another mess... But still, not as crazy as what happened to JBR and what's going on now with Nancy.
Although if the family member did take Nancy home in her car it might make sense.The family member didnt take nancy home in her own car. She went to her daughter's via uber. Reportedly, she was driven back home after dinner by "family". They impounded Nancy's Subaru from her garage.
Literally this could be a national security issue if this crap gets out of hand. Imagine terrorists orgs, China, Russia watching right now. They are already plotting who to kidnap.If anyone payed any kind of ransom they should never ever make this public because it opens up the road to so many other crazies thinking they can get rich quick through abduction.
I took “celebrate with her” to be a celebration of life and to bring her home.I had that thought too. That they now know she is dead and they want to simply bring her home. But the "celebrate with her" seemed to suggest she is still alive. So I concluded the family have received a threat to NG's life and are now resigned to paying whatever amount is being demanded. But then the "this is very valuable to us" is a very odd thing to say about a live person being returned![]()
which?I noticed 3 or 4 lines that seemed coded or responses or script lines the perp wanted to hear.
None of them will. IMOShe will never be the same.
I know what it said to meI was struck by the “this is very valuable to us”. Does that mean anything else on the surface? Seemed odd.
Wow. They will pay. This is crazy.